Cited by 89Sleep and related disordersHealth disparities and outcomesCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Habitual sleep as a contributor to racial differences in cardiometabolic risk

Open access
Curtis, David S., Fuller-Rowell, Thomas E., El-Sheikh, Mona, Carnethon, Mercedes R., Ryff, Carol D.·2017·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Large differences in cardiovascular disease and diabetes prevalence exist between African American and European American adults. The US federal government has committed to reducing racial disparities in health; however, the precise mechanisms are not well understood. Sleep is one potential behavioral explanation for current racial differences in cardiometabolic conditions. We show that more than one-half of racial differences in cardiometabolic risk can be explained by sleep patterns—namely, less total sleep and lower sleep efficiency among African American than European American adults. Sleep is a malleable health behavior that is linked with characteristics of the social and physical environment and could be an effective target in national efforts to reduce racial health disparities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1618167114

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curtis, D. S., Fuller-Rowell, T. E., El-Sheikh, M., Carnethon, M. R., & Ryff, C. D.
Affiliations
  • Auburn University (US)
  • Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849;
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2017-07-31
Volume
114
Issue
33
Pages
8889-8894
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2739990171
Cited by
89
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7
FWCI
9.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (P01-AG020166)
  • Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison (1UL1RR025011)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
sleep duration, sleep efficiency, racial disparities, cardiometabolic risk, African American adults, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, health disparities
MeSH terms
Adult, Black or African American, Female, Heart Diseases, Humans, Male, Metabolic Diseases, Sleep, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Biomarkers, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review