Cited by 253Cognitive Abilities and TestingAging and Gerontology ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Developmental Influences on Adult Intelligence

Schaie, K. Warner·2005·Oxford University Press eBooks

Abstract

This book lays out the reasons why we should study cognitive development in adulthood, and presents the history, latest data, and results from the Seattle Longitudinal Study (SLS), which now extends to over forty-five years. The SLS is organized around five questions: does intelligence change uniformly throughout adulthood, or are there different life-course-ability patterns? At what age and at what magnitude can decrement in ability be reliably detected? What are the patterns and magnitude of generational differences? What accounts for individual differences in age-related change in adulthood? Can the intellectual decline that increases with age be reversed by educational intervention? Based on work on the SLS, this book presents a conceptual model. The model represents this book's author's view on the factors that influence cognitive development throughout the human lifespan, and provides a rationale for the various influences that have been investigated — genetic factors, early and current family environment, life styles, the experience of chronic disease, and various personality attributes. The data in this volume include the 1998 longitudinal cycle of the SLS. In light of both new data and revised analyses, psychometric and neuropsychological assessments have been linked in long-term data to aid in the early identification of risk for dementia in later life. The book also presents new data and concludes on the impact of personality on cognition. It includes correlation m…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195156737.001.0001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Current cohorts may be peaking intellectually at later ages or maintaining their peak level of functioning until a later chronological age.

    “There is strong suggestive evidence that current cohorts may be peaking at later ages or maintaining their peak level of functioning until a later chronological age (Schaie, 2005).”

    From An Historical Framework for Cohort Differences in Intelligence (2005) · cites this paper as Schaie, 2005

  • All cognitive tests showed high test-retest reliabilities over 1 month (N = 705; r ≥ .78).

    “All tests showed high test–retest reliabilities over 1 month (based on N = 705; r ≥ .78; see Schaie, 2005).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schaie, K. W.
Corresponding author
Schaie, K. Warner
Venue
Oxford University Press eBooks
Published
2005-02-24
OpenAlex
W2478449778
Cited by
253
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.52
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
adult intelligence, Seattle Longitudinal Study, age-related cognitive decline, generational differences, educational intervention, genetic factors, family environment, lifestyle, chronic disease, personality and cognition, dementia risk, lifespan cognitive development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review