Cited by 163

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The endocytic receptor protein LRP also mediates neuronal calcium signaling via N -methyl- d -aspartate receptors

Bacskai, B. J., Xia, M. Q., Strickland, D. K., Rebeck, G. W., Hyman, B. T.·2000·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

The low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) is an endocytic receptor that is a member of the low density lipoprotein receptor family. We report that the LRP ligand, activated α 2 -macroglobulin (α 2 M*), induces robust calcium influx in cultured primary neurons, but not in nonneuronal LRP-containing cells in the same culture. The calcium influx is mediated through N -methyl- d -aspartate receptor channels, which explains the neuron specificity of the response. Microapplication of α 2 M* leads to a localized response at the site of application that dissipates rapidly, suggesting that the calcium signal is temporally and spatially discrete. Calcium influx to α 2 M* is blocked by the physiological LRP inhibitor, receptor-associated protein. Bivalent antibodies to the extracellular domain of LRP, but not Fab fragments of the same antibody, cause calcium influx, indicating that the response is specific to LRP and may require dimerization of the receptor. Thus, LRP is an endocytic receptor with a novel signaling role.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.200238297

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1016/0896-6273(93)90070-8 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1988.tb03306.x · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)38172-9 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)50384-2 · DOI
  5. 10.1074/jbc.274.2.717 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0378-1119(94)90565-7 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/1047-8477(91)90086-C · DOI
  8. 10.1016/1047-8477(92)90036-A · DOI
  9. 10.1074/jbc.273.48.32213 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)83641-4 · DOI
  11. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1998.71051993.x · DOI
  12. 10.1074/jbc.272.1.647 · DOI
  13. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0731393.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)45368-3 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)43962-2 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)32340-2 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)32305-0 · DOI
  18. 10.1006/abbi.1996.0359 · DOI
  19. 10.1006/bbrc.1994.1576 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1998.tb00190.x · DOI
  21. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-16-07100.1999 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01277-6 · DOI
  23. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19960201)43:3<282::AID-JNR3>3.0.CO;2-F · DOI
  24. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-02-00542.2000 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.92.21.9480 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1016/0006-8993(96)00741-X · DOI
  27. 10.1016/0006-8993(91)90820-L · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00475-X · DOI
  29. 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80782-5 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1097/00005072-199604000-00012 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/S0306-4522(98)00489-8 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90320-8 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-01-00195.1998 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1997.69051904.x · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1001/archneur.57.5.646 · DOI
  36. 10.1074/jbc.273.50.33556 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bacskai, B. J., Xia, M. Q., Strickland, D. K., Rebeck, G. W., & Hyman, B. T.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2000-10-03
Volume
97
Issue
21
Pages
11551-11556
ISSN
  • 0027-8424
  • 1091-6490
Cited by
163
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review