Cited by 33Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesFamily and Disability Support Research

The social patterning of autism diagnoses reversed in California between 1992 and 2018.

Open access
Winter, Alix S., Fountain, Christine, Cheslack-Postava, Keely, Bearman, Peter S.·2020·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Significance: Rates of autism diagnosis in the United States have historically been higher among more advantaged social groups—Whites and those of higher socioeconomic status (SES). Using data from all births in the state of California in 1992 through 2016, we find that these trends reversed during our study period. By 2018, diagnosed autism incidence rates for 3- to 6-y-old children were higher for children of Black and Asian mothers than children of non-Hispanic White mothers and were higher for children of lower SES than of higher SES parents. These reversals point to the fundamental role that access to knowledge and resources plays in driving increased autism prevalence and shifting patterns of autism cases over the past quarter-century.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2015762117

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winter, A. S., Fountain, C., Cheslack-Postava, K., & Bearman, P. S.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Fordham University (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032
Corresponding author
Bearman, Peter S.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2020-11-16
Volume
117
Issue
48
Pages
30295-30302
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3101169093
Cited by
33
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
HHS | NIH | Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD091205)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism diagnosis, autism prevalence, sociodemographic disparities, socioeconomic status, racial and ethnic disparities, autism epidemic, birth records, California, health disparities, children aged 3-6
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, California, Child, Child, Preschool, Humans, Incidence, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review