Cited by 183Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsMicroRNA in disease regulationRNA Research and Splicing

MicroRNA-27b Contributes to Lipopolysaccharide-mediated Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor γ (PPARγ) mRNA Destabilization

Open access
Jennewein, Carla, von Knethen, Andreas, Schmid, Tobias, Brüne, Bernhard·2010·Journal of Biological Chemistry

Abstract

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) gained considerable interest as a therapeutic target during chronic inflammatory diseases. Remarkably, the pathogenesis of diseases such as multiple sclerosis or Alzheimer is associated with impaired PPARgamma expression. Considering that regulation of PPARgamma expression during inflammation is largely unknown, we were interested in elucidating underlying mechanisms. To this end, we initiated an inflammatory response by exposing primary human macrophages to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and observed a rapid decline of PPARgamma1 expression. Because promoter activities were not affected by LPS, we focused on mRNA stability and noticed a decreased mRNA half-life. As RNA stability is often regulated via 3'-untranslated regions (UTRs), we analyzed the impact of the PPARgamma-3'-UTR by reporter assays using specific constructs. LPS significantly reduced luciferase activity of the pGL3-PPARgamma-3'-UTR, suggesting that PPARgamma1 mRNA is destabilized. Deletion or mutation of a potential microRNA-27a/b (miR-27a/b) binding site within the 3'-UTR restored luciferase activity. Moreover, inhibition of miR-27b, which was induced upon LPS exposure, partially reversed PPARgamma1 mRNA decay, whereas miR-27b overexpression decreased PPARgamma1 mRNA content. In addition, LPS further reduced this decay. The functional relevance of miR-27b-dependent PPARgamma1 decrease was proven by inhibition or overexpression of miR-27b, which affected LPS-induced expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) and interleukin (IL)-6. We provide evidence that LPS-induced miR-27b contributes to destabilization of PPARgamma1 mRNA. Understanding molecular mechanisms decreasing PPARgamma might help to better appreciate inflammatory diseases.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

LPS destabilizes PPARγ1 mRNA in human macrophages, and miR-27b, induced by LPS in an NFκB-dependent manner, contributes to this decay via a miR-27a/b binding site in the PPARγ 3′-UTR. Modulating miR-27b affects LPS-induced TNFα and IL-6 expression, linking this mechanism to inflammatory cytokine regulation.

Key findings

  • LPS (1 µg/ml) reduced PPARγ1 mRNA in differentiated THP-1 macrophages to ~20% after 3 h and decreased PPARγ protein with a minimum at 8 h; PPARγ1 mRNA half-life fell from 173 to 99 min with DRB plus LPS.
  • The PPARγ 3′-UTR reporter was reduced by LPS to ~65% after 3 h and ~50% after 6 h relative to pGL3-control; deletion or mutation of the miR-27 binding site abolished this LPS-mediated reduction.
  • LPS induced miR-27b 2.3-fold and miR-27a 1.6-fold; anti-miR-27b prevented LPS-dependent PPARγ1 mRNA reduction in a concentration-dependent manner, whereas miR-27b mimic reduced PPARγ1 mRNA and LPS further reduced it.
  • Functionally, miR-27b overexpression relieved rosiglitazone-mediated inhibition of LPS-induced TNFα and IL-6, while anti-miR-27b lowered TNFα and IL-6 induction upon LPS exposure.

Methods

  • Primary human macrophages were isolated from buffy coats and differentiated for 7 days; THP-1 monocytes were differentiated into macrophages with 50 nM PMA. Cells were stimulated with LPS (1 µg/ml), TNFα (15 ng/ml), IFNγ (10 units/ml), or IFNγ plus LPS.
  • PPARγ1 mRNA, miRNA, and cytokine expression were measured by qPCR; PPARγ protein by Western analysis; PPARγ promoter, PPRE, and PPARγ-3′-UTR activity by luciferase reporter assays using wild-type, ΔmiR-27, and C83A/U84G constructs.
  • mRNA stability was assessed with DRB; miRNA function was tested by transfecting miR-27b mimic or anti-miR-27a/b inhibitors. Experiments were performed at least three times, with paired or unpaired Student’s t tests and significance at p < 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001.

Limitations

  • The paper states that actinomycin D and DRB can differently affect mRNA half-life estimates, and that actinomycin D may affect mRNA stability by inducing translocalization of ARE-binding proteins.
  • The paper states that additional regulatory mechanisms likely operate: LPS further decreased PPARγ1 mRNA despite miR-27b overexpression, miR-27b overexpression did not significantly reduce PPARγ mRNA half-life in the absence of LPS, and TNFα experiments suggested other mechanisms besides miR-27b-dependent down-regulation.
  • Evident from the text: the work relies on in vitro human macrophage/THP-1 systems and reporter constructs, without in vivo validation of the miR-27b–PPARγ1 axis in inflammatory disease models.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m109.066399

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

8 of 14 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingcitation

    NFκB inhibition with Bay11-7082 abrogates LPS-mediated PPARγ1 mRNA decay.

    “Inhibition of NFB with Bay11-7082 abrogated LPS-mediated PPAR␥1 mRNA decay, which is corroborated by the work of Necela et al. (22).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Necela et al. [22] Necela, 2008, Immunology source

      The Results section reports that NF-κB inhibitors, including Bay 11-7085, blocked LPS-mediated downregulation of PPARγ. But its mRNA-stability experiment found that LPS had no significant effect on PPARγ mRNA degradation; the paper attributes the reduction to inhibited mRNA synthesis, not decay. It therefore does not corroborate the claimed mechanism or the specific Bay11-7082 result. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingcitation

    LPS time-dependently reduces PPARγ1 mRNA and protein amounts in macrophages.

    “LPS, a classical pro-inflammatory stimulus time-dependently reduced PPAR␥1 mRNA and protein amounts in macrophages, which is in line with the work of Necela et al. (22) showing a reduction of PPAR␥ mRNA in murine RAW264.7 macrophages.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Necela et al. [22] Necela, 2008, Immunology source
  • Premisecitation

    Chronic inflammatory disease conditions often reveal impaired PPARγ abundance.

    “Interestingly, these disease conditions often revealed impaired PPAR␥ abundance (16,17).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [16] Kobayashi, 2005, Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. source
    • cites [17] Dubuquoy, 2006, Gut source

      The Introduction reports 60% lower colonic PPARγ expression in patients with ulcerative colitis and impaired expression in a mouse model of ileitis. It also says expression in Crohn’s disease patients was comparable to controls, so it does not establish that chronic inflammatory disease conditions generally or often show reduced PPARγ abundance. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Studies in PPARγ knock-out macrophages showed these cells express higher amounts of pro-inflammatory mediators such as IL-6.

    “Studies in PPAR␥ knock-out macrophages supported the importance of PPAR␥, because these cells expressed higher amounts of pro-inflammatory mediators such as IL-6 (22).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Necela, 2008, Immunology source
  • Findingown data

    LPS induces a 2.3-fold increase of miR-27b.

    “In line, we observed a 2.3-fold increase of miR-27b in response to LPS, which is comparable to the induction of miR-146a after 2 h of LPS exposure in THP-1 cells (6).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Taganov, 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. source

      The Results report rapid LPS-induced miR-146 expression in THP-1 cells, supporting the cited comparison in general. Our copy does not give a 2-hour fold change for miR-146a, so it does not establish that the induction was comparable in magnitude to 2.3-fold. The miR-27b result is explicitly the citing authors’ own observation, not a result attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 6
  • May combine two claims. 9
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In macrophages, PPARγ represses inducible nitric-oxide synthase induction and concomitant NO production.

    “In macrophages PPAR␥ represses inducible nitric-oxide (NO) synthase induction as well as concomitant NO production (11)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] Li, 2000, Mol. Cell. Biol. source

      The Abstract states that liganded PPARγ inhibits induction of the iNOS gene in monocytes/macrophages, and the Results report repression of LPS-induced iNOS promoter activity. The cited paper does not report a corresponding reduction in NO production, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    PPARγ-3'UTR contains several ARE1 and ARE4 sites and a potential miR-27a/b binding site.

    “In silico analysis showed several ARE 1 (AUUUA) and ARE 4 (12-mer A/U, max.one mismatch) sites (33) as well as a potential miR-27a/b binding site.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] Sharova, 2009, DNA Res. source

      The Results and discussion section (Multivariate analysis of gene structural features; page unavailable) defines ARE1 as AUUUA and ARE4 as A/U 12-mers with no more than one mismatch. It does not report that several such sites occur in the PPARγ 3′-UTR. The miR-27a/b clause follows citation (33) and is not assessed as attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    miR-146 and miR-155 negatively regulate Toll-like receptor signaling.

    “miR-146 and miR-155 gained special interest and are well described for negatively regulating Toll-like receptor (TLR)-signaling (6).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Taganov, 2006, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) proposes that miR-146 negatively regulates TLR signaling through a feedback loop involving IRAK1 and TRAF6, but describes that role as a suggestion rather than an established effect. It reports that miR-155 is induced by LPS; it does not show that miR-155 negatively regulates TLR signaling. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    LPS decreases total PPARγ1 mRNA in primary macrophages with a nadir around 6 h and recovery nearly to control levels by 24 h.

    “There was a slight increase of PPAR␥1 mRNA after 30 min followed by a rapid decrease of PPAR␥1 with the lowest mRNA amounts after 6 h.Extended incubation periods allowed to recover PPAR␥1 mRNA content nearly reaching control levels after 24 h of LPS treatment (Fig. 1B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    DRB alone reduces PPARγ1 mRNA to about 60% after 3 h, and DRB plus LPS decreases it to 26% relative to untreated cells.

    “DRB alone reduced PPAR␥1 mRNA expression to ϳ60% after 3 h, whereas DRB plus LPS decreased mRNA to 26% relative to untreated cells (Fig. 2B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The PPARγ-3'UTR contains distinct AREs and a potential binding site for miR-27a/b.

    “The in-depth analysis of the PPAR␥-3Ј-UTR (TargetScanHuman 5.1) revealed distinct AREs and a potential binding site for miR-27a/b (Fig. 3A).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Using actinomycin D, we observed similar results (LPS-induced destabilization).

    “Using actinomycin D we observed similar results.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Inhibiting miR-27b with anti-miR-27b prevents TNFα-induced reduction and allows induction of PPARγ1 mRNA.

    “Moreover, inhibiting miR-27b by transfecting cells with anti-miR- 27b not only prevented the reduc- tion but even allowed induction of PPAR␥1 mRNA (supplemental Fig. S2C), suggesting that besides miR-27b-dependent down-regulation, other regulatory mechanisms are operating.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    PPARγ is important to shape an anti-inflammatory macrophage phenotype and appears crucial for dampening inflammation.

    “Thus, PPAR␥ is important to shape an anti-inflammatory macrophage phenotype and appears crucial for dampening inflammation (15).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] Serhan, 2005, Nat. Immunol. source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Decreased PPARγ expression prolongs inflammation and attenuates resolution of inflammation.

    “We suggest that decreased PPAR␥ expression prolongs inflammation and thus, attenuates resolution of inflammation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    TLR activation triggers induction of miRNAs such as miR-21 or miR-132.

    “However, TLR activation also triggers induction of miRNAs such as miR-21 or miR-132 (5)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] Sheedy, 2008, Ann. Rheum. Dis. source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Inhibiting NFκB decreases expression of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, TNFα, or IL-6.

    “Moreover, inhibiting nuclear factor B (NFB) decreases expression of inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1, tumor necrosis factor ␣ (TNF␣) or IL-6 (12).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [12] Ricote, 1998, Nature source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    miRNAs play an eminent role in controlling immune responses and have been associated with several inflammatory diseases.

    “Functionally miRNAs play an eminent role in controlling immune responses and have been associated with several inflammatory diseases (5).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] Sheedy, 2008, Ann. Rheum. Dis. source
13 of 13
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mechanisms attenuating PPARγ expression remained obscure.

    “Because mechanisms attenuating PPAR␥ expression remained obscure, we investigated regulation of PPAR␥ during inflammation.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Reduction of PPARγ promoter 1 activity to 60% is negligible for the LPS-induced PPARγ1 mRNA decrease.

    “we assumed that reduction of the promoter 1 activity to 60% is negligible for the LPS-induced PPAR␥1 mRNA decrease.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Inflammatory signals in general provoke PPARγ mRNA decay.

    “we suggest that inflammatory signals in general provoke a mRNA decay.This assumption is supported by the notion that NFB, a major inflammatory transcription factor, is involved.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Reported anti-miR dose falls outside the stated protocol range

    Minor

    The transfection procedure specifies 100-300 pmol of anti-miR inhibitor, while Figure 5A reports a 50-pmol condition.

  • Conflicting LPS pretreatment times for the PPRE assay

    Minor

    The results describe 4 hours of LPS pretreatment before rosiglitazone, whereas the Figure 1E caption specifies 6 hours.

  • Figure 6C treatment timing conflicts with the transfection protocol

    Minor

    The transfection procedure says cells were cultured for another 48 hours before experiments, but the Figure 6C caption says DRB treatment began 2 hours after transfection.

  • Abstract says LPS did not affect promoter activity

    Minor

    The abstract says promoter activities were not affected by LPS, but the results report that LPS reduced promoter 1 activity to about 60% after 6 hours.

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Taylor, 1996, Mol. Endocrinol., 10, 140

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jennewein, C., von Knethen, A., Schmid, T., & Brüne, B.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Brüne, Bernhard
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
285
Issue
16
Pages
11846-11853
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2023869046
Cited by
183
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 16
FWCI
6.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion)
  • Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
microRNA-27b, PPARγ1, mRNA stability, lipopolysaccharide, macrophages, 3' untranslated region, microRNA binding sites, inflammation, inflammatory cytokines, TNF-α, interleukin-6, chronic inflammatory diseases
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Lipopolysaccharides, Macrophages, Molecular Sequence Data, Mutation, RNA, Messenger, Transfection, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Interleukin-6, Sequence Deletion, DNA Primers, 3' Untranslated Regions, RNA Stability, MicroRNAs, PPAR gamma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-20.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-20.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review