The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recycling of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Is Mediated by a Novel Form of the Clathrin Adaptor Protein Eps15
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Since AP-1 has been shown to localize to Rab11-positive recycling endosomes [28], and ligand-stimulated EGFR is recycled back to the PM through Rab11-positive endosomes [29, 30], we examined if three molecules, EGFR, AP-1, and Rab11, could show colocalization in the cytoplasm.”
From Clathrin adapters AP-1 and GGA2 support expression of epidermal growth factor receptor for cell growth (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“Previous studies have demonstrated that ligand-stimulated EGFR is recycled back to the PM through Rab11-positive endosomes, which is promoted by the short form of EPS15 [30] and a tyrosine-phosphorylated component, Odin [29, 30].”
From Clathrin adapters AP-1 and GGA2 support expression of epidermal growth factor receptor for cell growth (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“RUSC2/iporin contains a RUN domain (named based on its presence in RPIP8, UNC-14, and NESCA proteins) that interacts with Rab1 and Rab35 small GTPases (51, 52).”
From EHD1 and RUSC2 Control Basal Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Cell Surface Expression and Recycling (2020) · cites this paper as [51]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 51
- Maxfield, 2004, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 5, 121, 10.1038/nrm1315 · DOI · Paper page
- Jones, 2006, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 18, 549, 10.1016/j.ceb.2006.08.003 · DOI
- Doherty, 2009, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 78, 857, 10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.081307.110540 · DOI · Paper page
- Gruenberg, 2004, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 5, 317, 10.1038/nrm1360 · DOI
- Slagsvold, 2006, Trends Cell Biol., 16, 317, 10.1016/j.tcb.2006.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
- Woodman, 2008, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 20, 408, 10.1016/j.ceb.2008.04.001 · DOI
- Sigismund, 2008, Dev. Cell, 15, 209, 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.06.012 · DOI
- Naslavsky, 2005, J. Cell Sci., 118, 4093, 10.1242/jcs.02595 · DOI · Paper page
- Grant, 2008, Traffic, 9, 2043, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00834.x · DOI · Paper page
- Grant, 2009, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 10, 597, 10.1038/nrm2755 · DOI · Paper page
- van der Sluijs, 1992, Cell, 70, 729, 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90307-X · DOI
- Sheff, 1999, J. Cell Biol., 145, 123, 10.1083/jcb.145.1.123 · DOI · Paper page
- Kouranti, 2006, Curr. Biol., 16, 1719, 10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.020 · DOI · Paper page
- Ren, 1998, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 95, 6187, 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6187 · DOI · Paper page
- Naslavsky, 2006, Mol. Biol. Cell, 17, 163, 10.1091/mbc.e05-05-0466 · DOI · Paper page
- D'Souza-Schorey, 2006, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 7, 347, 10.1038/nrm1910 · DOI
- Sharma, 2009, Mol. Biol. Cell, 20, 5181, 10.1091/mbc.e09-06-0535 · DOI · Paper page
- Horgan, 2009, Biochem. Soc. Trans., 37, 1032, 10.1042/BST0371032 · DOI
- Carbone, 1997, Cancer Res., 57, 5498
- Benmerah, 1999, J. Cell Sci., 112, 1303, 10.1242/jcs.112.9.1303 · DOI
- Benmerah, 2000, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 3288, 10.1074/jbc.275.5.3288 · DOI
- van Bergen En Henegouwen, 2009, Cell Commun. Signal., 7, 24, 10.1186/1478-811X-7-24 · DOI
- Haffner, 1997, FEBS Lett., 419, 175, 10.1016/S0014-5793(97)01451-8 · DOI
- Chen, 1998, Nature, 394, 793, 10.1038/29555 · DOI · Paper page
- Tebar, 1996, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 28727, 10.1074/jbc.271.46.28727 · DOI
- Iannolo, 1997, Cancer Res., 57, 240
- Klapisz, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 30746, 10.1074/jbc.M203004200 · DOI
- Polo, 2002, Nature, 416, 451, 10.1038/416451a · DOI · Paper page
- de Melker, 2004, J. Biol. Chem., 279, 55465, 10.1074/jbc.M409765200 · DOI
- Sigismund, 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 102, 2760, 10.1073/pnas.0409817102 · DOI · Paper page
- Hoeller, 2006, Nat. Cell Biol., 8, 163, 10.1038/ncb1354 · DOI
- Roxrud, 2008, J. Cell Biol., 180, 1205, 10.1083/jcb.200708115 · DOI
- Cao, 2005, Nat. Cell Biol., 7, 483, 10.1038/ncb1246 · DOI · Paper page
- Chi, 2008, Mol. Biol. Cell, 19, 3564, 10.1091/mbc.e07-10-0997 · DOI
- Orth, 2006, Cancer Res., 66, 3603, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2916 · DOI
- Cao, 2010, Mol. Cell. Biol., 30, 781, 10.1128/MCB.00330-09 · DOI
- Henley, 1998, J. Cell Biol., 141, 85, 10.1083/jcb.141.1.85 · DOI · Paper page
- Fazioli, 1993, Mol. Cell. Biol., 13, 5814
- Bache, 2003, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 12513, 10.1074/jbc.M210843200 · DOI · Paper page
- Coda, 1998, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 3003, 10.1074/jbc.273.5.3003 · DOI
- Poupon, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 8941, 10.1074/jbc.M108385200 · DOI
- Torrisi, 1999, Mol. Biol. Cell, 10, 417, 10.1091/mbc.10.2.417 · DOI
- Acconcia, 2009, Exp. Cell Res., 315, 1610, 10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.10.014 · DOI
- Ullrich, 1996, J. Cell Biol., 135, 913, 10.1083/jcb.135.4.913 · DOI · Paper page
- Schlierf, 2000, Exp. Cell Res., 259, 257, 10.1006/excr.2000.4947 · DOI
- Naslavsky, 2004, Mol. Biol. Cell, 15, 2410, 10.1091/mbc.e03-10-0733 · DOI
- Soldati, 2006, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 7, 897, 10.1038/nrm2060 · DOI
- Nedvetsky, 2007, Traffic, 8, 110, 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2006.00508.x · DOI
- Swiatecka-Urban, 2007, J. Biol. Chem., 282, 23725, 10.1074/jbc.M608531200 · DOI
- Wang, 2008, Cell, 135, 535, 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.057 · DOI · Paper page
- Traer, 2007, Nat. Cell Biol., 9, 1370, 10.1038/ncb1656 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Koustas, E., Karamouzis, M. V., Mihailidou, C., Schizas, D., & Papavassiliou, A. G. (2017) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2017.03.023 · Cited by 79
Rivero-Ríos, P., Romo-Lozano, M., Fernández, B., Fdez, E., & Hilfiker, S. (2020) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells9071719 · Cited by 38
Uemura, T., Suzuki, T., Dohmae, N., & Waguri, S. (2021) · Oncogenesis · doi:10.1038/s41389-021-00367-2 · Cited by 19
EHD1 and RUSC2 Control Basal Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Cell Surface Expression and Recycling
Tom, E. C., Mushtaq, I., Mohapatra, B. C., Luan, H., Bhat, A. M., Zutshi, N., Chakraborty, S., Islam, N., Arya, P., Bielecki, T. A., et al. (2020) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00434-19 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Chi, S., Cao, H., Wang, Y., & McNiven, M. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Biological Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 286
- Issue
- 40
- Pages
- 35196-35208
- ISSN
- 0021-9258
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
