Cited by 248Protein Degradation and InhibitorsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysChemical Synthesis and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In Vivo Knockdown of Pathogenic Proteins via Specific and Nongenetic Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein (IAP)-dependent Protein Erasers (SNIPERs)

Open access

Abstract

Many diseases, especially cancers, result from aberrant or overexpression of pathogenic proteins. Specific inhibitors against these proteins have shown remarkable therapeutic effects, but these are limited mainly to enzymes. An alternative approach that may have utility in drug development relies on selective degradation of pathogenic proteins via small chimeric molecules linking an E3 ubiquitin ligase to the targeted protein for proteasomal degradation. To this end, we recently developed a protein knockdown system based on hybrid small molecule SNIPERs (Specific and Nongenetic IAP-dependent Protein Erasers) that recruit inhibitor of the apoptosis protein (IAP) ubiquitin ligases to specifically degrade targeted proteins. Here, we extend our previous study to show a proof of concept of the SNIPER technology in vivo . By incorporating a high affinity IAP ligand, we developed a novel SNIPER against estrogen receptor α (ERα), SNIPER(ER)-87, that has a potent protein knockdown activity. The SNIPER(ER) reduced ERα levels in tumor xenografts and suppressed the growth of ERα-positive breast tumors in mice. Mechanistically, it preferentially recruits X-linked IAP (XIAP) rather than cellular IAP1, to degrade ERα via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. With this IAP ligand, potent SNIPERs against other pathogenic proteins, BCR-ABL, bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4), and phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) could also be developed. These results indicate that forced ubiquitylation by SNIPERs is a useful method to achieve efficient protein knockdown with potential therapeutic activities and could also be applied to study the role of ubiquitylation in many cellular processes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m116.768853

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 42 references

2 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ohoka, N., Okuhira, K., Ito, M., Nagai, K., Shibata, N., Hattori, T., Ujikawa, O., Shimokawa, K., Sano, O., Koyama, R., Fujita, H., Teratani, M., Matsumoto, H., Imaeda, Y., Nara, H., Cho, N., & Naito, M.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Health Sciences (JP)
  • Takeda (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Naito, Mikihiko
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
292
Issue
11
Pages
4556-4570
ISSN
0021-9258 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2585495993
Cited by
240
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 18
FWCI
11.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (26860049, 16H05090, 16K15121)
  • Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (15ak0101029h1402, 16ak0101029j1403, 16cm0106124j0001)
  • Takeda Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
Keywords
snipers, protein degradation, inhibitor of apoptosis proteins, XIAP, estrogen receptor alpha, breast cancer, tumor xenografts, ubiquitin-proteasome system, E3 ubiquitin ligase, BCR-ABL, BRD4, phosphodiesterase 4, protein knockdown, targeted protein degradation
MeSH terms
Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, Breast, Breast Neoplasms, Cell Line, Female, Humans, Ligands, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Nude, Cell Line, Tumor, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex, Estrogen Receptor alpha, Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins, Mice, X-Linked Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein, Small Molecule Libraries, Ubiquitination, Drug Discovery, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review