CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 133

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

DKK1 Antagonizes Wnt Signaling without Promotion of LRP6 Internalization and Degradation

Semënov, Mikhail V., Zhang, Xinjun, He, Xi·2008·Journal of Biological Chemistry
DOI 10.1074/jbc.m800014200
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

DKK1 is a secreted protein that antagonizes Wnt signaling and plays essential roles in vertebrate embryogenesis including head induction, skeletal development, and limb patterning. DKK1 is also implicated in osteoporosis, arthritis, and cancer and represents a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of these diseases. DKK1 is a high affinity antagonistic ligand for LRP6, which is a Wnt coreceptor that acts together with the Frizzled serpentine receptor to initiate Wnt signal transduction. Two different models have been proposed to account for the mechanism by which DKK1 antagonizes LRP6 function. One model suggests that DKK1 binding to LRP6 disrupts Wnt-induced Frizzled-LRP6 complex formation, whereas the other model proposes that DKK1 interaction with LRP6 promotes LRP6 internalization and degradation, thereby reducing the cell surface LRP6 level. To clarify the molecular basis of DKK1 action, we examined how DKK1 affects the endogenous LRP6 in several mammalian cell lines including mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Here we show that DKK1 inhibits Wnt signaling but induces neither LRP6 down-regulation from the cell surface nor reduction of total LRP6 protein level and that DKK1 has no effect on the rate of continuous internalization of LRP6 and the half-life (about 4.7 h) of LRP6. We conclude that DKK1 inhibition of LRP6 is independent of LRP6 internalization and degradation.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1074/jbc.m800014200

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Glinka, 1998, Nature, 391, 357, 10.1038/34848 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Mukhopadhyay, 2001, Dev. Cell, 1, 423, 10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00041-7 · DOI
  3. MacDonald, 2004, Development (Camb.), 131, 2543, 10.1242/dev.01126 · DOI
  4. Adamska, 2004, Dev. Biol., 272, 134, 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.04.026 · DOI
  5. Morvan, 2006, J. Bone Miner. Res., 21, 934, 10.1359/jbmr.060311 · DOI
  6. MacDonald, 2007, Bone, 41, 331, 10.1016/j.bone.2007.05.009 · DOI
  7. Diarra, 2007, Nat. Med., 13, 156, 10.1038/nm1538 · DOI
  8. Aguilera, 2006, Oncogene, 25, 4116, 10.1038/sj.onc.1209439 · DOI
  9. Mikheev, 2004, Carcinogenesis, 25, 47, 10.1093/carcin/bgg190 · DOI
  10. Kelly, 2004, Development (Camb.), 131, 2803, 10.1242/dev.01137 · DOI
  11. Carter, 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 102, 12843, 10.1073/pnas.0501963102 · DOI
  12. Nusse, 2005, Cell Res., 15, 28, 10.1038/sj.cr.7290260 · DOI
  13. He, 2004, Development (Camb.), 131, 1663, 10.1242/dev.01117 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Tamai, 2000, Nature, 407, 530, 10.1038/35035117 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Semenov, 2001, Curr. Biol., 11, 951, 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00290-1 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Liu, 2005, Mol. Cell. Biol., 25, 3475, 10.1128/MCB.25.9.3475-3482.2005 · DOI
  17. Cong, 2004, Development (Camb.), 131, 5103, 10.1242/dev.01318 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Mao, 2001, Nature, 411, 321, 10.1038/35077108 · DOI
  19. Krupnik, 1999, Gene, 238, 301, 10.1016/S0378-1119(99)00365-0 · DOI
  20. Brott, 2002, Mol. Cell. Biol., 22, 6100, 10.1128/MCB.22.17.6100-6110.2002 · DOI
  21. Li, 2002, J. Biol. Chem., 277, 5977, 10.1074/jbc.M111131200 · DOI
  22. Mao, 2002, Nature, 417, 664, 10.1038/nature756 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Semenov, 2005, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 26770, 10.1074/jbc.M504308200 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Brown, 1998, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 248, 879, 10.1006/bbrc.1998.9061 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Semenov, 2006, J. Biol. Chem., 281, 38276, 10.1074/jbc.M609509200 · DOI
  26. Graeve, 1989, J. Cell Biol., 109, 2809, 10.1083/jcb.109.6.2809 · DOI
  27. Le, 1999, J. Cell Biol., 146, 219
  28. Carpenter, 1987, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 56, 881, 10.1146/annurev.bi.56.070187.004313 · DOI
  29. Tamai, 2004, Mol. Cell, 13, 149, 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00484-2 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Hassler, 2007, Development (Camb.), 134, 4255, 10.1242/dev.005942 · DOI
  31. Wei, 2007, J. Biol. Chem., 282, 15903, 10.1074/jbc.M701927200 · DOI
  32. Khan, 2007, Mol. Cell. Biol., 27, 7291, 10.1128/MCB.00773-07 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Semënov, M. V., Zhang, X., & He, X.
Venue
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
283
Issue
31
Pages
21427-21432
ISSN
0021-9258
DOI
10.1074/jbc.m800014200
Cited by
133
References
7
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review