Cited by 90Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMental Health Treatment and Access

Current Views and Perspectives on E-Mental Health: An Exploratory Survey Study for Understanding Public Attitudes Toward Internet-Based Psychotherapy in Germany

Open access
Apolinário-Hagen, Jennifer, Vehreschild, Viktor, Alkoudmani, Ramez M·2017·JMIR Mental Health

Abstract

Background: Despite the advanced development of evidence-based psychological treatment services, help-seeking persons with mental health problems often fail to receive appropriate professional help. Internet-delivered psychotherapy has thus been suggested as an efficient strategy to overcome barriers to access mental health care on a large scale. However, previous research indicated poor public acceptability as an issue for the dissemination of Internet-delivered therapies. Currently, little is known about the expectations and attitudes toward Internet-delivered therapies in the general population. This is especially the case for countries such as Germany where electronic mental health (e-mental health) treatment services are planned to be implemented in routine care. Objective: This pilot study aimed to determine the expectations and attitudes toward Internet-based psychotherapy in the general population in Germany. Furthermore, it aimed to explore the associations between attitudes toward Internet-based therapies and perceived stress. Methods: To assess public attitudes toward Internet-based psychotherapy, we conducted both Web-based and paper-and-pencil surveys using a self-developed 14-item questionnaire (Cronbach alpha=.89). Psychological distress was measured by employing a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the 20-item German version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ). In addition, we conducted explorative factor analysis (principal axis factor analysis with promax rotation). Spearman’s rank correlations were used to determine the associations between attitudes toward Internet-based therapies and perceived stress. Results: Descriptive analyses revealed that most respondents (N=1558; female: 78.95%, 1230/1558) indicated being not aware of the existence of Internet-delivered therapies (83.46%, 1141/1367). The average age was 32 years (standard deviation, SD 10.9; range 16-76). Through exploratory factor analysis, we identified 3 dimensions of public attitudes toward Internet-based therapies, which we labeled “usefulness or helpfulness,” “relative advantage or comparability,” and “accessibility or access to health care.” Analyses revealed negative views about Internet-based therapies on most domains, such as perceived helpfulness. The study findings further indicated ambivalent attitudes: Although most respondents agreed to statements on expected improvements in health care (eg, expanded access), we observed low intentions to future use of Internet-delivered therapies in case of mental health problems. Conclusions: This pilot study showed deficient “e-awareness” and rather negative or ambivalent attitudes toward Internet-delivered therapies in the German-speaking general population. However, research targeting determinants of the large-scale adoption of Internet-based psychotherapy is still in its infancy. Thus, further research is required to explore the “black box” of public attitudes toward Internet-delivered therapies with representative samples, validated measures, and longitudinal survey designs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/mental.6375

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Easier access to services that users would otherwise not have access to is a facilitator of engagement.

    “Identified facilitators were easier access to services that users would otherwise not have access to [103,173]”

    From Barriers to and facilitators of user engagement with digital mental health interventions: Systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [173]

    The Introduction (Background; page unavailable) reports that convenience of access matters to decisions to engage with e-mental health services. The Discussion (Summary of Main Findings; page unavailable) reports positive views of expanded access, including reaching more patients and bridging waits for conventional therapy. The paper does not establish that access to otherwise unavailable services actually facilitates engagement; its own findings concern attitudes toward that potential benefit. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This study complements research concerning the constraints on implementation of CCBT services and might shed light on potential reasons for poor engagement of patients and high drop-out rates.

    “In addition, this study complements research concerning the constraints on implementation of CCBT services (Folker et al ., 2018), and might shed light on potential reasons for poor engagement of patients (Apolinario-Hagen et al ., 2017) and high drop-out rates.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Apolinário-Hagen, J., Vehreschild, V., & Alkoudmani, R. M.
Affiliations
  • FernUniversität in Hagen (DE)
  • International Islamic University Malaysia (MY)
Corresponding author
Apolinário-Hagen, Jennifer
Venue
JMIR Mental Health
Published
2017-02-23
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
e8
ISSN
2368-7959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2591368092
Cited by
90
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
10.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Mental Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
e-mental health, internet-based psychotherapy, public attitudes, help-seeking, perceived stress, access to mental health care, helplessness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review