Cited by 188Digital Education and SocietyEthics and Social Impacts of AIArtificial Intelligence in Education

AI and the future of humanity: ChatGPT-4, philosophy and education – Critical responses

Open access

Abstract

Michael A PetersBeijing Normal UniversityChatGPT is an AI chatbot released by OpenAI on November 30, 2022 and a ‘stable release’ on February 13, 2023. It belongs to OpenAI’s GPT-3 family (generativ...

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00131857.2023.2213437

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There has been a notable upswing in discussions among scholars and academicians regarding the transformative potential of generative AI, particularly ChatGPT, in higher education and the risks associated with it.

    “there has been a notable upswing in discussions among scholars and academicians regarding the transformative potential of generative AI, particularly ChatGPT, in higher education and the risks associated with it (Dalalah & Dalalah, 2023; Meyer et al., 2023; Peters et al., 2023; Yilmaz & Yilmaz, 2023a).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peters, M. A., Jackson, L., Papastephanou, M., Jandrić, P., Lazaroiu, G., Evers, C. W., Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., Araya, D., Tesar, M., Mika, C., Chen, L., Wang, C., Sturm, S., Rider, S., & Fuller, S.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Normal University (CN)
  • Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of Cyprus (CY)
  • Tehničko Veleučilište u Zagrebu (HR)
  • Spiru Haret University, Bucharest
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Centre for International Governance Innovation (CA)
  • School Learning, Development and Professional Practice, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • University of Canterbury (NZ)
  • Shanxi University (CN)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Peters, Michael A.
Venue
Educational Philosophy and Theory
Published
2023-06
Volume
56
Issue
9
Pages
828-862
ISSN
  • 0013-1857 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-5812
OpenAlex
W4379143611
Cited by
188
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 8
FWCI
44.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Educational Philosophy and Theory (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Education and Society
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
ChatGPT-4, generative AI, AI chatbots, future of humanity, philosophy of education, OpenAI, GPT-3

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review