Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impact of supply chain analytics on operational performance: a resource-based view

Open access
Chae, Bongsug (Kevin), Olson, David, Sheu, Chwen·2014·International Journal of Production Research
DOI 10.1080/00207543.2013.861616
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study seeks to better understand the role of supply chain analytics (SCA) on supply chain planning satisfaction and operational performance. We define the architecture of SCA as the integration of three sets of resources, data management resources (DMR), IT-enabled planning resources and performance management resources (PMR), from the perspective of a resource-based view. Based on the data collected from 537 manufacturing plants, we test hypotheses exploring the relationships among these resources, supply chain planning satisfaction, and operational performance. Our analysis supports that DMR should be considered a key building block of manufacturers’ business analytics initiatives for supply chains. The value of data is transmitted to outcome values through increasing supply chain planning and performance capabilities. Additionally, the deployment of advanced IT-enabled planning resources occurs after acquisition of DMR. Manufacturers with sophisticated planning technologies are likely to take advantage of data-driven processes and quality control practices. DMR are found to be a stronger predictor of PMR than IT planning resources. All three sets of resources are related to supply chain planning satisfaction and operational performance. The paper concludes by reviewing research limitations and suggesting further SCA research issues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207543.2013.861616

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 93

  1. 10.1080/00207540902791769 · doi:10.1080/00207540902791769
  2. 10.1177/0149206307307645 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00093-9 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.jom.2004.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1080/00207543.2012.728011 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1109/TEM.2005.856570 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1287/isre.1100.0300 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/978-3-540-32827-8_29 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Clark L., 2013, Tesco Uses Supply Chain Analytics to Save £100 m a Year
  10. Davenport T. H., 2007, Competing on Analytics: The New Science of Winning
  11. Davenport T., 2011, Supply Chain Quarterly, 28
  12. Davenport T., 2010, Analytics at Work: Smarter Decisions, Better Results
  13. 10.1007/s11747-009-0137-1 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.jom.2010.12.009 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.jom.2010.12.006 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.jom.2006.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2007.tb00284.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.048 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1287/mnsc.49.3.273.12736 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1007/978-1-4419-6485-4_8 · DOI
  22. 10.1287/isre.1080.0195 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Economist, 2010, The Economist
  24. 10.2753/MIS0742-1222230110 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0272-6963(97)90004-8 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.2307/3151312 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1108/01443570710714556 · DOI
  28. Gefen D., 2000, Communications of AIS, 4, 1
  29. Gefen D., 2011, MIS Quarterly, 35, 3, 10.2307/23044042 · DOI
  30. 10.1108/02656710910950333 · DOI
  31. 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.4324/9780203339527 · doi:10.4324/9780203339527
  33. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.007 · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.08.007
  34. 10.1016/j.jom.2006.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.jom.2006.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Houghton R., 2004, MIS Quarterly Executive, 3, 19
  37. 10.1007/s12525-011-0059-x · DOI
  38. Jander M., 2011, Internet Evolution
  39. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00209.x · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.002 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Kiron D., 2011, MIT Sloan Management Review, 53, 1
  42. Kohli R., 2008, Journal of Association for Information Systems, 9, 23, 10.17705/1jais.00147 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2004.tb00146.x · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1080/00207540600632216 · DOI
  45. 10.1111/j.1055-6001.2005.04103005.x · DOI
  46. Lavalle S., 2011, MIT Sloan Management Review, 52, 21
  47. 10.1287/inte.1100.0502 · DOI
  48. Mackenzie S., 2011, MIS Quarterly, 35, 293, 10.2307/23044045 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Manyika J., 2011, McKinsey Report
  50. Marchand D., 2000, Sloan Management Review, 41, 69
  51. 10.1016/j.ijpe.2003.06.001 · DOI
  52. 10.1080/0020754031000093150 · doi:10.1080/0020754031000093150
  53. Mithas S., 2011, MIS Quarterly, 35, 237, 10.2307/23043496 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1016/j.jom.2005.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
  55. 10.1080/00207543.2011.555785 · DOI
  56. Nevo S., 2010, MIS Quarterly, 34, 163, 10.2307/20721419 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1016/j.jsis.2011.08.001 · DOI
  58. 10.1002/smj.573 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Nunnally J., 1994, Psychometric theory
  60. O’dwyer J., 2011, Supply Chain Management Review, 15, 32
  61. 10.1016/j.jom.2010.11.012 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1080/00207543.2012.701772 · DOI
  63. Penrose E., 1959, The Theory of the Growth of the Firm
  64. 10.1016/j.im.2008.12.006 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Pfeffer J., 2006, Harvard Business Review, 84, 62
  66. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5<375::AID-SMJ876>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1016/S0272-6963(01)00070-5 · DOI
  68. SAS, 2012, Supply Chain Analytics: Beyond ERP and SCM
  69. 10.1108/02635579710191680 · doi:10.1108/02635579710191680
  70. 10.1080/00207540903174908 · DOI
  71. 10.1080/00207543.2011.588266 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.007 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1108/09590550710722350 · DOI
  74. 10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.019 · DOI · Paper page
  75. Shapiro J., 2000, Modeling the Supply Chain
  76. 10.1145/903893.903943 · doi:10.1145/903893.903943
  77. 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.07.003 · DOI
  79. 10.1002/smj.337 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1016/j.dss.2010.03.007 · DOI
  81. 10.1016/0272-6963(86)90015-X · DOI
  82. Turban E., 2011, Business Intelligence: A Managerial Approach
  83. Viswanathan N., 2010, Aberdeen Group
  84. Vollmann T., 2005, Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply Chain Management
  85. 10.1108/02635570110365970 · DOI
  86. 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1998.tb00886.x · DOI · Paper page
  87. 10.1002/smj.4250050207 · DOI · Paper page
  88. Whybark D., 2009, Decision Line, 17
  89. Wixom B., 2005, MIS Quarterly, 16, 85
  90. 10.1016/j.indmarman.2005.05.003 · DOI · Paper page
  91. 10.1108/13598540710737271 · DOI
  92. 10.1080/00207543.2011.600345 · doi:10.1080/00207543.2011.600345
  93. 10.1016/j.jom.2008.02.001 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
Chae, B. (., Olson, D., & Sheu, C.
Venue
International Journal of Production Research
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-12-04
Volume
52
Issue
16
Pages
4695-4710
ISSN
  • 0020-7543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1366-588X
DOI
10.1080/00207543.2013.861616
OpenAlex
W2090773524
Cited by
218
References
9
FWCI
10.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impact of supply chain analytics on operational performance: a resource-based view. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/00207543.2013.861616
The paper
Chae, B. (., Olson, D., & Sheu, C. (2014). The impact of supply chain analytics on operational performance: a resource-based view. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.861616

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.