Cited by 58Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFace Recognition and PerceptionVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Processing of compound visual stimuli by children with autism and Asperger syndrome

Deruelle, Christine, Rondan, Cecilie, Gepner, Bruno, Fagot, Joël·2006·International Journal of Psychology

Abstract

A typical modes of visual processing are common in individuals with autism. In particular, and unlike typically developing children, children with autism tend to process the parts of a complex object as a priority, rather than attending to the object as a whole. This bias for local processing is likely to be due to difficulties in assembling subparts into a coherent whole, as proposed by Frith ( 1989) using the term “weak central coherence” or WCC. This study was aimed to better characterize the processing of complex visual stimuli by children with autism. Thirteen children with autistic spectrum disorders were individually paired with children of two control groups, one matched on verbal mental age (VMA) and one matched on chronological age (CA). Participants from the three groups were tested in two tasks. The first task involved hierarchical global/local stimuli, inspired by Navon ( 1977). The second task employed compound face‐like or geometrical stimuli. This task emphasized the processing of configural properties of the stimuli (i.e., spatial relationships). Children from the three groups showed a perceptual bias favouring the global dimension of the stimuli in the first task. By contrast, children with autism were deficient compared to normal children for the processing of the configural dimensions of the stimuli in the second task. These results suggest that visual cognition of children with autism is characterized by a dissociation between global and configural processing, with global processing being preserved and configural processing being altered in these children, therefore delineating the extents and limits of the WCC theory (Frith, 1989).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00207590500184610

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deruelle, C., Rondan, C., Gepner, B., & Fagot, J.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • CNRS, Mediterranean Institute of Cognitive Neurosciences Marseille France
  • Montperrin Hospital Aix en Provence France
Corresponding author
Deruelle, Christine
Venue
International Journal of Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-04
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
97-106
ISSN
  • 0020-7594 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-066X
OpenAlex
W2037561589
Cited by
58
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • HAL AMU (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, Asperger syndrome, visual processing, weak central coherence, global-local processing, configural processing, face perception, hierarchical stimuli, children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review