Cited by 81Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Development and Psychometric Characteristics of the Dissociation Tension Scale

Stiglmayr, Christian, Schimke, Patricia, Wagner, Till, Braakmann, Diana, Schweiger, Ulrich, Sipos, Valerija, Fydrich, Thomas, Schmahl, Christian +5 more·2010·Journal of Personality Assessment

Abstract

The newly developed Dissoziations-Spannungs-Skala (Dissociation Tension Scale; DSS) is a self-rating instrument for the assessment of psychological and somatoform dissociative features (ranging from normal up to pathological) as well as aversive inner tension occurring within the past 7 days. The DSS contains 21 items assessing dissociative symptoms and 1 additional item assessing aversive inner tension. Ratings are made on a time-oriented scale ranging from 0% (never) to 100% (constantly). We measured the psychometric qualities of the DSS in a total of 294 patients and healthy controls. Internal consistency of the DSS was high (Cronbach's alpha = .92; Gutmann's split-half r = .92). We found good support for convergent, discriminant, and differential validity. There was clear evidence for the DSS being a sensitive instrument for the assessment of changing symptomatology. Assessment of dissociation and other psychopathological features over the same period of time are now possible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/00223891003670232

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies summarized used well-established psychometric scales of dissociation (e.g., DES or DSS), showing excellent internal consistency, reliability, and high specificity and sensitivity to change in symptomatology.

    “Most studies, summarized in this article, used well-established psychometric scales of dissociation (e.g., DES or DSS), showing excellent internal consistency, reliability, and high specificity and sensitivity to change in symptomatology [53].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stiglmayr, C., Schimke, P., Wagner, T., Braakmann, D., Schweiger, U., Sipos, V., Fydrich, T., Schmahl, C., Ebner-Priemer, U., Kleindienst, N., Bischkopf, J., Auckenthaler, A., & Kienast, T.
Affiliations
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • University of Lübeck (DE)
  • Central Institute of Mental Health (DE)
  • d Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy , Central Institute of Mental Health , Mannheim, Germany
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Venue
Journal of Personality Assessment
Published
2010-04-19
Volume
92
Issue
3
Pages
269-277
ISSN
  • 0022-3891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7752
OpenAlex
W2047340578
Cited by
80
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
dissociation, somatoform dissociation, dissociative symptoms, self-report questionnaire, psychometric validation, internal consistency, convergent validity, discriminant validity, differential validity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Factors, Somatoform Disorders, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review