Cited by 1,809Personality Traits and PsychologyCultural Differences and ValuesSocial Power and Status Dynamics

Global Self-Esteem and Specific Self-Esteem: Different Concepts, Different Outcomes

Rosenberg, Morris, Schooler, Carmi, Schoenbach, Carrie, Rosenberg, Florence·1995·American Sociological Review

Abstract

Morris Rosenberg, Carmi Schooler, Carrie Schoenbach, Florence Rosenberg, Global Self-Esteem and Specific Self-Esteem: Different Concepts, Different Outcomes, American Sociological Review, Vol. 60, No. 1 (Feb., 1995), pp. 141-156

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/2096350

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Specific self-esteem predicts specific behavior, while global self-esteem predicts psychological well-being.

    “Specific self-esteem predicts specific behavior, while global self-esteem predicts psychological well-being because specific prices have a stronger effect on behavior than global self-esteem [33].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rosenberg, M., Schooler, C., Schoenbach, C., & Rosenberg, F.
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
1995-02
Volume
60
Issue
1
Pages
141
ISSN
0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2315437849
Cited by
1,809
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 156 · 2022: 110 · 2021: 125 · 2020: 104 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 92 · 2017: 87 · 2016: 78 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 52
FWCI
16.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
global self-esteem, self-esteem measurement, self-concept, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review