The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Children's Talk and the Development of Reasoning in the Classroom
Abstract
Sixty British primary school children aged 9‐10 and their teachers took part in an experimental teaching programme, designed to improve the quality of children's reasoning and collaborative activity by developing their awareness of language use and promoting certain ‘ground rules’ for talking together. Children's subsequent use of language when carrying out collaborative activities in the classroom was observed and analysed, and effects on their performance on Raven's Progressive Matrices test of non‐verbal reasoning were also investigated. Comparative data were gathered from children in matched control classes. Qualitative and quantitative analyses of discourse showed a marked shift in target children's use of language in accord with the aims of the teaching programme, and demonstrated that adherence to the ground rules helped groups solve the reasoning test problems. Children's individual scores on the Raven's test also improved. These findings support a sociocultural view of intellectual development and confirm the value of explicitly teaching children how to use language to reason.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vygotsky, L. S. (1964) · Bulletin of the Orton Society · doi:10.1007/bf02928399 · Cited by 20,704
Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context
Rogoff, B. (1990) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001 · Cited by 4,709
Cited by
Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science
Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R., & Sams, C. (2004) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/01411920410001689689 · Cited by 637
Self-citationClassroom dialogue: a systematic review across four decades of research
Howe, C., & Abedin, M. (2013) · Cambridge Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/0305764x.2013.786024 · Cited by 606
Argumentation for Learning: Well-Trodden Paths and Unexplored Territories
Asterhan, C. S. C., & Schwarz, B. B. (2016) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1155458 · Cited by 338
Teaching Children How to Use Language to Solve Maths Problems
Mercer, N., & Sams, C. (2006) · Language and Education · doi:10.2167/le678.0 · Cited by 314
Self-citationStudent thought and classroom language: examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching
Reznitskaya, A., & Gregory, M. (2013) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2013.775898 · Cited by 289
Collaborative reasoning: a dialogic approach to group discussions
Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L., Clark, A., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C., & Nguyen‐Jahiel, K. (2009) · Cambridge Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/03057640802701952 · Cited by 275
Osborne, J., Simon, S., Christodoulou, A., Howell‐Richardson, C., & Richardson, K. (2013) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21073 · Cited by 268
Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., Ing, M., Wong, J., Fernandez, C. H., Shin, N., & Turrou, A. C. (2014) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2013.02.001 · Cited by 236
Translanguaging in mainstream education: a sociocultural approach
Duarte, J. (2019) · International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · doi:10.1080/13670050.2016.1231774 · Cited by 204
‘Explain to your partner’: teachers' instructional practices and students' dialogue in small groups
Webb, N. M., Franke, M. L., De, T., Chan, A. G., Freund, D., Shein, P., & Melkonian, D. K. (2009) · Cambridge Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/03057640802701986 · Cited by 193
Towards a generalized competency model of collaborative problem solving
Sun, C., Shute, V. J., Stewart, A., Yonehiro, J., Duran, N., & D'Mello, S. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103672 · Cited by 189
The silent and the vocal: Participation and learning in whole-class discussion
O'Connor, C., Michaels, S., Chapin, S., & Harbaugh, A. G. (2017) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.003 · Cited by 168
Mapping Children’s Discussions of Evidence in Science to Assess Collaboration and Argumentation
Maloney, J., & Simon, S. (2006) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690600855419 · Cited by 131
Scaffolding Science Talk: The role of teachers' questions in the inquiry classroom
Kawalkar, A., & Vijapurkar, J. (2013) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.604684 · Cited by 129
How student characteristics affect girls' and boys' verbal engagement in physics instruction
Jurik, V., Gröschner, A., & Seidel, T. (2013) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.09.002 · Cited by 99
Benedict-Chambers, A., Kademian, S. M., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2017) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1366674 · Cited by 68
Teacher discursive moves: conceptualising a schema of dialogic discourse in science classrooms
Bansal, G. (2018) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1514543 · Cited by 65
Promoting thinking, problem‐solving and reasoning during small group discussions
Gillies, R. M. (2011) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540602.2011.538498 · Cited by 63
Dyad Composition Effects on Cognitive Elaboration and Student Achievement
Denessen, E., Veenman, S., Dobbelsteen, J., & Van Schilt, J. (2008) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.3200/jexe.76.4.363-386 · Cited by 37
Enhancing evidence-based argumentation in a Mainland China middle school
Shi, Y. (2019) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101809 · Cited by 35
Rajendram, S. (2019) · Unpublished · doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.31489.61284 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L.
- Venue
- British Educational Research Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-02
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 95-111
- ISSN
- 0141-1926 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-3518
- OpenAlex
- W2046671499
- Cited by
- 695
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
