CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 493Innovations in Medical EducationStudent Assessment and FeedbackCompetency Development and Evaluation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education.

Lockyer, Jocelyn, Carraccio, Carol, Chan, Ming-Ka, Hart, Danielle, Smee, Sydney, Touchie, Claire, Holmboe, Eric S., Frank, Jason R., on behalf of the ICBME Collaborators·2017·Medical Teacher
DOI 10.1080/0142159x.2017.1315082
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The meaningful assessment of competence is critical for the implementation of effective competency-based medical education (CBME). Timely ongoing assessments are needed along with comprehensive periodic reviews to ensure that trainees continue to progress. New approaches are needed to optimize the use of multiple assessors and assessments; to synthesize the data collected from multiple assessors and multiple types of assessments; to develop faculty competence in assessment; and to ensure that relationships between the givers and receivers of feedback are appropriate. This paper describes the core principles of assessment for learning and assessment of learning. It addresses several ways to ensure the effectiveness of assessment programs, including using the right combination of assessment methods and conducting careful assessor selection and training. It provides a reconceptualization of the role of psychometrics and articulates the importance of a group process in determining trainees' progress. In addition, it notes that, to reach its potential as a driver in trainee development, quality care, and patient safety, CBME requires effective information management and documentation as well as ongoing consideration of ways to improve the assessment system.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/0142159x.2017.1315082

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Holmboe ES, 2008, Practical guide to the evaluation of clinical competence
  2. Nyquist JG., 2014, Techniques for assessment of learner performance in teaching and assessing the competencies
  3. Pawson R, 1997, Realistic evaluation
  4. Surowiecki J., 2005, The wisdom of crowds

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 493

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lockyer, J., Carraccio, C., Chan, M.-K., Hart, D., Smee, S., Touchie, C., Holmboe, E. S., Frank, J. R., & Collaborators, O. B. O. T. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • American Board of Pediatrics, Chapel Hill, NC, USA;
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Medical Council of Canada (CA)
  • Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (US)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Lockyer, Jocelyn
ORCID
Venue
Medical Teacher
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2017-06-03
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
609-616
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
DOI
10.1080/0142159x.2017.1315082
OpenAlex
W2623879525
Cited by
493
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 6
FWCI
32.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Competency Development and Evaluation
Keywords
competency-based medical education, learning assessment, assessment for learning, assessor training, psychometrics, feedback, assessment system improvement
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Competency-Based Education, Education, Medical, Educational Measurement, Feedback, Humans, Learning, Psychometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review