Cited by 530Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingNutrition and Health in Aging

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dietary protein for athletes: From requirements to optimum adaptation

Open access
Phillips, Stuart M., Van Loon, Luc J.C.·2011·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

Opinion on the role of protein in promoting athletic performance is divided along the lines of how much aerobic-based versus resistance-based activity the athlete undertakes. Athletes seeking to gain muscle mass and strength are likely to consume higher amounts of dietary protein than their endurance-trained counterparts. The main belief behind the large quantities of dietary protein consumption in resistance-trained athletes is that it is needed to generate more muscle protein. Athletes may require protein for more than just alleviation of the risk for deficiency, inherent in the dietary guidelines, but also to aid in an elevated level of functioning and possibly adaptation to the exercise stimulus. It does appear, however, that there is a good rationale for recommending to athletes protein intakes that are higher than the RDA. Our consensus opinion is that leucine, and possibly the other branched-chain amino acids, occupy a position of prominence in stimulating muscle protein synthesis; that protein intakes in the range of 1.3-1.8 g · kg(-1) · day(-1) consumed as 3-4 isonitrogenous meals will maximize muscle protein synthesis. These recommendations may also be dependent on training status: experienced athletes would require less, while more protein should be consumed during periods of high frequency/intensity training. Elevated protein consumption, as high as 1.8-2.0 g · kg(-1) · day(-1) depending on the caloric deficit, may be advantageous in preventing lean mass losses during periods of energy restriction to promote fat loss.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2011.619204

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 84 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Levenhagen D. K., 2001, American Journal of Physiology: Endocrinology and Metabolism, 280, E982
  2. McKenzie S., 2000, American Journal of Physiology: Endocrinology and Metabolism, 278, E580
  3. Robinson M. M., FASEB Journal
  4. Tipton K. D., 2001, American Journal of Physiology: Endocrinology and Metabolism, 281, E197
  5. Young V. R., 1987, Human Nutrition Clinical Nutrition, 41, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 525

Metadata

Authors
Phillips, S. M., & Van Loon, L. J. C.
Affiliations
McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Phillips, Stuart M.
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2011-01
Volume
29
Issue
sup1
Pages
S29-S38
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W1966008891
Cited by
530
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Nutrition and Health in Aging
Keywords
dietary protein, athletes, protein requirements, muscle protein synthesis, leucine, branched-chain amino acids, resistance training, endurance training, muscle mass gain, lean mass loss, caloric restriction, fat loss, caloric deficit, training status, meal frequency
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Amino Acids, Body Composition, Energy Intake, Diet, Dietary Proteins, Humans, Muscle Proteins, Nutritional Requirements, Physical Education and Training, Protein-Energy Malnutrition, Sports, Protein Biosynthesis, Exercise, Guidelines as Topic, Athletic Performance, Resistance Training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review