Cited by 52Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

Considerations for protein intake in managing weight loss in athletes

Murphy, Caoileann H., Hector, Amy J., Phillips, Stuart M.·2015·European Journal of Sport Science

Abstract

A large body of evidence now shows that higher protein intakes (2–3 times the protein Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) of 0.8 g/kg/d) during periods of energy restriction can enhance fat‐free mass (FFM) preservation, particularly when combined with exercise. The mechanisms underpinning the FFM‐sparing effect of higher protein diets remain to be fully elucidated but may relate to the maintenance of the anabolic sensitivity of skeletal muscle to protein ingestion. From a practical point of view, athletes aiming to reduce fat mass and preserve FFM should be advised to consume protein intakes in the range of ∼1.8–2.7 g kg−1 d−1 (or ∼2.3–3.1 g kg−1 FFM) in combination with a moderate energy deficit (−500 kcal) and the performance of some form of resistance exercise. The target level of protein intake within this recommended range requires consideration of a number of case‐specific factors including the athlete's body composition, habitual protein intake and broader nutrition goals. Athletes should focus on consuming high‐quality protein sources, aiming to consume protein feedings evenly spaced throughout the day. Post‐exercise consumption of 0.25–0.3 g protein meal−1 from protein sources with high leucine content and rapid digestion kinetics (i.e. whey protein) is recommended to optimise exercise‐induced muscle protein synthesis. When protein is consumed as part of a mixed macronutrient meal and/or before bed slightly higher protein doses may be optimal.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17461391.2014.936325

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, C. H., Hector, A. J., & Phillips, S. M.
Affiliations
McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Phillips, Stuart M.
Venue
European Journal of Sport Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-11
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
21-28
ISSN
  • 1536-7290 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-1391
OpenAlex
W2122721325
Cited by
52
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Sport Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
protein intake, weight loss, athletes, caloric restriction, resistance training, muscle protein synthesis, whey protein, leucine, negative energy balance, body composition
MeSH terms
Body Composition, Dietary Proteins, Humans, Weight Loss, Athletes, Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Recommended Dietary Allowances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review