Cited by 235Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactPolymer Science and PVC

Migration of fluorochemical paper additives from food-contact paper into foods and food simulants

Begley, T. H., Hsu, W., Noonan, G., Diachenko, G.·2008·Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A

Abstract

Fluorochemical-treated paper was tested to determine the amount of migration that occurs into foods and food-simulating liquids and the characteristics of the migration. Migration characteristics of fluorochemicals from paper were examined in Miglyol, butter, water, vinegar, water-ethanol solutions, emulsions and pure oil containing small amounts of emulsifiers. Additionally, microwave popcorn and chocolate spread were used to investigate migration. Results indicate that fluorochemicals paper additives do migrate to food during actual package use. For example, we found that microwave popcorn contained 3.2 fluorochemical mg kg(-1) popcorn after popping and butter contained 0.1 mg kg(-1) after 40 days at 4 degrees C. Tests also indicate that common food-simulating liquids for migration testing and package material evaluation might not provide an accurate indication of the amount of fluorochemical that actually migrates to food. Tests show that oil containing small amounts of an emulsifier can significantly enhance migration of a fluorochemical from paper.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02652030701513784

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite restrictions and phase-out of PFOS and PFOA in developed countries, alternatives such as short-chain PFCAs, short-chain PFSAs, and PAPs have been put into production.

    “Despite the restrictions and phase-out of PFOS and PFOA in developed countries, 8 alternatives, such as short-chain perfluoroalkyl carboxylates (PFCAs), short-chain perfluoroalkyl sulfonates (PFSAs), and polyfluoroalkyl phosphate esters (PAPs) have been put into production.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Begley, T. H., Hsu, W., Noonan, G., & Diachenko, G.
Affiliations
  • Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Begley, T. H.
Venue
Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A
Published
2008-03
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
384-390
ISSN
  • 1944-0049 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-0057
OpenAlex
W2024698672
Cited by
235
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Additives & Contaminants Part A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Science and PVC
Keywords
food contact paper, papermaking additives, Miglyol, food simulants, butter, chocolate spread, emulsifiers, oil-in-water emulsions, food packaging
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Consumer Product Safety, Fluorocarbons, Food Contamination, Food Technology, Paper, Food Packaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review