Cited by 184Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchLandfill Environmental Impact StudiesEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Quantitative determination of fluorochemicals in municipal landfill leachates

Open access
Huset, Carin A., Barlaz, Morton A., Barofsky, Douglas F., Field, Jennifer A.·2011·Chemosphere

Abstract

Twenty-four fluorochemicals were quantified in landfill leachates recovered from municipal refuse using an analytical method based on solid-phase extraction, dispersive-carbon sorbent cleanup, and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. The method was applied to six landfill leachates from four locations in the US as well as to a leachate generated by a laboratory bioreactor containing residential refuse. All seven leachates had the common characteristic that short-chain (C(4)-C(7)) carboxylates or sulfonates were greater in abundance than their respective longer-chain homologs (≥ C(8)). Perfluoroalkyl carboxylates were the most abundant (67 ± 4% on a nanomolar (nM) basis) fluorochemicals measured in leachates; concentrations of individual carboxylates reaching levels up to 2800 ng L(-1). Perfluoroalkyl sulfonates were the next most abundant class (22 ± 2%) on a nM basis; their abundances in each of the seven leachates derived from municipal refuse were greater for the shorter-chain homologs (C(4) and C(6)) compared to longer-chain homologs (C(8) and C(10)). Perfluorobutane sulfonate concentrations were as high as 2300 ng L(-1). Sulfonamide derivatives composed 8 ± 2.1% (nM basis) of the fluorochemicals in landfill leachates with methyl (C(4) and C(8)) and ethyl (C(8)) sulfonamide acetic acids being the most abundant. Fluorotelomer sulfonates (6:2 and 8:2) composed 2.4 ± 1.3% (nM basis) of the fluorochemicals detected and were present in all leachates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.072

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The evaluated PFAA-precursors are intermediates in the conversion of other PFAA-precursors such as FTOH to terminal PFCAs and PFSAs.

    “These evaluated precursors are considered as intermediates in the conversion of other PFAA-precursors such as fluorotelomer alcohol (FTOH) to terminal PFCAs and PFSAs (Hamid et al., 2020; Huset et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2013).”

    From Evaluation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in leachate, gas condensate, stormwater and groundwater at landfills (2023) · cites this paper as Huset et al., 2011

    Section 3.2.3 describes Me-FBSAA as a likely precursor to PFBS formed from Me-FBSE degradation, and identifies Et-FOSAA and Me-FOSAA as biodegradation products of other sulfonamidoethanols. This supports an intermediate-to-terminal-sulfonate pathway, but our copy does not establish the claimed FTOH pathway or conversion of these intermediates to terminal PFCAs. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Evaluated PFAA-precursors in this study, like 5:3 FTCA, are considered intermediate precursors and can be converted from original precursors, like FTOH.

    “Evaluated PFAA-precursors in this study, like 5:3 FTCA, are considered intermediate precursors and can be converted from original precursors, like FTOH”

    From Evaluation of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in leachate, gas condensate, stormwater and groundwater at landfills (2023) · cites this paper as Huset et al., 2011

    Section 3.2.4 reports measurements of 6:2 and 8:2 fluorotelomer sulfonates, while section 3.2.3 discusses degradation of different sulfonamide compounds. Searches for 5:3 FTCA, FTOH, and their proposed conversion found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed precursor pathway. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • PFAS concentrations in landfill leachate range from low ng/L to 100s of ng/L.

    “PFAS concentrations in landfill leachate range from low ng/L to 100s of ng/L (Eggen et al., 2010;Huset et al., 2011;Clarke et al., 2015).”
  • In general, perfluorocarboxylic acids (e.g., PFOA) are more abundant than perfluorosulfonic acids (e.g., PFOS) and shorter-chain PFASs are more abundant than longer-chain in landfill leachates, although individual landfills have different relative abundances.

    “These studies show that in general, perfluorocarboxylic acids (e.g., PFOA) are more abundant than perfluorosulfonic acids (e.g., PFOS) and shorter-chain PFASs are more abundant than longer-chain, although individual landfills have different relative abundances.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Benson CH Barlaz MA Lane DT Rawe J 2007 Bioreactor landfills in North America: Review of the state-of-the practice Waste Manage 27 13 29 16766174
  2. Schultz MM Barofsky D Field J 2006 Quantitative determination of fluorinated alkyl substances in municipal wastewater by large-volume-injection LC/MS/MS Environ Sci Technol 40 289 295 16433363 PMC2597010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Huset, C. A., Barlaz, M. A., Barofsky, D. F., & Field, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Field, Jennifer A.
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-03
Volume
82
Issue
10
Pages
1380-1386
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084961182
Cited by
184
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30ES000210, #P30-ES00210)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
fluorochemicals, landfill leachate, municipal solid waste, perfluoroalkyl carboxylates, perfluoroalkyl sulfonates, PFBS, sulfonamide derivatives, fluorotelomer sulfonates, solid-phase extraction
MeSH terms
Caprylates, Chromatography, Liquid, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Refuse Disposal, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Pollution, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Solid Phase Extraction, Tandem Mass Spectrometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review