Cited by 13Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Cognitive behavioral therapy for managing depressive and anxiety symptoms after brain injury: a meta-analysis

Barua, Ujjoyinee, Ahrens, Jessica, Shao, Richard, MacKenzie, Heather, Wolfe, Dalton, Sequeira, Keith, Teasell, Robert, Loh, Eldon +1 more·2024·Brain Injury

Abstract

Background Individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) are at increased risk of depression and anxiety, leading to impaired recovery. While cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) addresses anxiety and depression maintenance factors, its efficacy among those with TBI has not been clearly demonstrated. This review aims to bridge this gap in the literature.Methods Several databases, including Medline, PsycInfo and EMBASE, were used to identify studies published between 1990 and 2021. Studies were included if: (1) trials were randomized controlled trials (RCT) involving CBT-based intervention targeting anxiety and/or depression; (2) participants experienced brain injury at least 3-months previous; (3) participants were ≥18 years old. An SMD ± SE, 95% CI and heterogeneity were calculated for each outcome.Results Thirteen RCTs were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled-sample analyses suggest that CBT interventions had small immediate post-treatment effects on reducing depression (SMD ± SE: 0.391 ± 0.126, p < 0.005) and anxiety (SMD ± SE: 0.247 ± 0.081, p < 0.005). Effects were sustained at a 3-months follow-up for depression. A larger effect for CBT was seen when compared with supportive therapy than control. Another sub-analysis found that individualized CBT resulted in a slightly higher effect compared to group-based CBT.Conclusion This meta-analysis provides substantial evidence for CBT in managing anxiety and depression post-TBI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699052.2024.2309264

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barua, U., Ahrens, J., Shao, R., MacKenzie, H., Wolfe, D., Sequeira, K., Teasell, R., Loh, E., & Mehta, S.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Parkwood Institute (CA)
Corresponding author
Mehta, Swati
Venue
Brain Injury
Published
2024-02-06
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
227-240
ISSN
  • 0269-9052 (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-301X
OpenAlex
W4391565880
Cited by
12
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Injury (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
thor(s) reported there is no
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, traumatic brain injury, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic depression, post-traumatic anxiety, group cognitive behavioral therapy, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Brain Injuries, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review