Cited by 104Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesTreatment of Major Depression

Depressive symptoms and cognitive control in a mixed antisaccade task: Specific effects of depressive rumination

Open access
De Lissnyder, Evi, Derakshan, Nazanin, De Raedt, Rudi, Koster, Ernst H. W.·2011·Cognition & Emotion

Abstract

Growing empirical evidence suggests that cognitive and affective problems in depression may be a reflection of cognitive control impairments. However, to date, the nature of such impairments is still poorly understood and further investigation of this topic is required to advance current knowledge on the underlying vulnerability factors for depression. Using a mixed antisaccade paradigm, the present study examined if depressive symptoms in general, and more specifically rumination, are related to impairments in cognitive control functions such as inhibition and switching. The results on antisaccade latency and error rates indicated that depressive symptoms in general were not related to impairments in inhibition and switching. However, rumination was associated with impaired inhibition such that high, compared to low, ruminators had slower antisaccade latencies. No group differences were observed on antisaccade error rates. Implications for understanding the underlying vulnerability factors for the development of depressive symptoms are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699931.2010.514711

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. K. (1996). Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory (2 nd ed.). The Psychological Association: San Antionio, TX.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Lissnyder, E., Derakshan, N., De Raedt, R., & Koster, E. H. W.
Affiliations
  • Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Venue
Cognition & Emotion
Published
2011-08
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
886-897
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W2020026681
Cited by
104
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • Vlaamse regering
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
depressive symptoms, rumination, cognitive control, antisaccade task, inhibition, cognitive shifting
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition Disorders, Depression, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Saccades, Thinking, Visual Perception, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review