Cited by 75Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMind wandering and attentionMental Health Research Topics

State rumination: Associations with emotional stress reactivity and attention biases

Open access
LeMoult, Joelle, Arditte, Kimberly A., D'Avanzato, Catherine, Joormann, Jutta·2013·Journal of Experimental Psychopathology

Abstract

Within dysphoria, rumination has been identified as a particularly maladaptive emotion regulation strategy linked to prolonged negative affect and the onset of depressive episodes. Until now, the majority of research assessing naturally occurring rumination has utilized trait rumination measures; however, additional information may be obtained by assessing state rumination. The current study examined the association between state rumination and participants' emotional recovery from stress. In addition, biased attention toward emotional information was investigated as a mechanism that might underlie state rumination. Participants completed the exogenous cuing task to assess attentional engagement and disengagement from emotional facial expressions followed by a psychosocial stressor. State rumination and self-reported sadness were measured during the recovery period. As expected, state rumination was associated with less recovery in sadness scores, even after controlling for trait rumination and depressive symptoms. Moreover, within the high dysphoria group, participants who had more difficulty disengaging from emotional expressions reported higher levels of rumination in response to the stressor. Results highlight an important association between state rumination and individuals' recovery from stress, and suggest that difficulty disengaging attention from emotional expressions might be one mechanism underlying state rumination in dysphoria.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5127/jep.029112

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Another study found that acute psychosocial stress interacted with state rumination in biasing attention toward emotional information.

    “Another study found that acute psychosocial stress interacted with state rumination in biasing attention toward emotional information (LeMoult et al., 2013).”

    From Toward objective characterizations of suicide risk: A narrative review of laboratory-based cognitive and behavioral tasks (2023) · cites this paper as LeMoult et al., 2013

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that, following an acute psychosocial stressor, state rumination was correlated with difficulty disengaging attention from negative stimuli in the high-dysphoria group. It does not report that stress interacted with state rumination to bias attention toward emotional information; the reported finding is an association, not that interaction. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LeMoult, J., Arditte, K. A., D'Avanzato, C., & Joormann, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Department of Psychology, University of Miami, 5665 Ponce de Leon Blvd. Coral Gables, FL 33134, USA
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychopathology
Published
2013-05-13
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
471-484
ISSN
2043-8087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976441351
Cited by
75
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychopathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH086246)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
state rumination, trait rumination, attentional bias, attentional disengagement, attentional engagement, dysphoria, emotional recovery, sadness, depressive symptoms, emotion regulation, facial expressions, psychosocial stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review