Cited by 31Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Cognitive fusion and emotion differentiation: does getting entangled with our thoughts dysregulate the generation, experience and regulation of emotion?

Plonsker, Reut, Gavish Biran, Dana, Zvielli, Ariel, Bernstein, Amit·2017·Cognition and Emotion

Abstract

Reut Plonskera, Dana Gavish Birana, Ariel Zviellia & Amit Bernsteina*a Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, IsraelCONTACT Amit Bernstein abernstein@psy.haifa.ac.ilSupplemental data for this article can be accessed at: doi:10.1080/02699931.2016.1211993.ABSTRACTWe tested whether cognitive fusion impairs emotion differentiation and thereby mediates relations between cognitive fusion and depression and panic symptoms among 55 adults (Mage = 26.8 (3.9), 50.9% women). Using visual stimuli, we elicited multiple emotion states and measured (a) emotional intensity – the subjective emotion intensity of elicited emotions (i.e. Specific Emotion Intensity – SEI), as well as (b) emotional differentiation – the degree of co-activation of multiple negative emotions when a specific emotion was elicited (i.e. Multiple Emotion Co-Activation – MECA). First, as hypothesised, we found that cognitive fusion predicted lower levels of emotion differentiation (MECA). In contrast, as hypothesised, these effects were significantly greater than the (null) effects of cognitive fusion on emotion intensity (SEI). Second, as predicted, MECA, but not SEI, predicted depression and panic symptoms. Finally, we found that MECA mediated the effects of cognitive fusion on depression and panic symptoms. The present findings contribute novel, preliminary empirical insight into associations between cognitive fusion, impaired emotion differentiation and mental ill-health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02699931.2016.1211993

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Plonsker, R., Gavish Biran, D., Zvielli, A., & Bernstein, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Haifa (IL)
  • Department of Psychology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
Corresponding author
Bernstein, Amit
Venue
Cognition and Emotion
Published
2016-08-02
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
1286-1293
ISSN
  • 0269-9931 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0600
OpenAlex
W2501961107
Cited by
31
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognition & Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
cognitive fusion, emotion differentiation, emotional intensity, depression, panic symptoms, emotion regulation, acceptance and commitment therapy, negative emotions
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Panic, Photic Stimulation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review