The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement
Abstract
As a result of the controversy over the dimensionality of the ethos/source credibility construct and the associated plethora of empirical studies in the 1960s and 1970s, Aristotle's dimension of “goodwill” has been dismissed by many contemporary theorists and researchers. It is argued that this occurred as a result of errors made in the earlier empirical research and that “goodwill” can be measured, contrary to earlier claims, and should be restored to its former status in rhetorical communication theory. Empirical research is reported indicating the existence of the goodwill dimension as part of the structure of the ethos/source credibility construct and a measure of that dimension is provided with evidence for its reliability and validity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The scale originates from a widely cited study by McCroskey and Teven that validated a credibility scale composed of 3 related dimensions—goodwill (caring), competence, and trustworthiness [2].”
From Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada (2019) · cites this paper as [2]
Citations
Cites
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957) · Cited by 9,433
A Second Generation Little Jiffy
Kaiser, H. F. (1970) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291817 · Cited by 4,855
Norman, W. T. (1963) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0040291 · Cited by 2,619
(2017) · doi:10.5040/9798400682018.ch-003 · Cited by 2,248
Lumsdaine, A. A. (1954) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02713272 · Cited by 2,237
An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research
Stacks, D. W. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203887011 · Cited by 1,014
DIMENSIONS FOR EVALUATING THE ACCEPTABILITY OF MESSAGE SOURCES
Berlo, D. K., Lemert, J. B., & Mertz, R. J. (1969) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/267745 · Cited by 831
An Introduction to Rhetorical Communication
McCroskey, J. C. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315663791 · Cited by 746
Self-citationScales for the measurement of ethos
McCroskey, J. C. (1966) · Speech Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637756609375482 · Cited by 648
Self-citationEthos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades
McCroskey, J. C., & Young, T. J. (1981) · Central States Speech Journal · doi:10.1080/10510978109368075 · Cited by 571
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Koehn S.C., 1996, Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association
- Walter O., 1948, The measurement of ethos.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,000
The Constitution of Individual Rhetorical Agency in a Health Risk Situation
Roe, D., & Kjeldsen, J. E. (2025) · Rhetoric of Health & Medicine · doi:10.5744/rhm.2025.2868 · Cited by 4
Williamson, L. D., Cafferty, L. A., Waller, J. L., Wolf, L. E., Jones, S. R., & Ledford, C. J. W. (2025) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909882.2025.2599824 · Cited by 1
“As a planned measure of group effectiveness, we administered the M&T scale (McCroskey & Teven, 1999) to measure community member assessment of researcher credibility at the first meeting, which occurred in May, August, or November 2022.”
Influentialvan Sebille, E., Weel, C., Vliegenthart, R., & Bos, M. (2026) · Geoscience Communication · doi:10.5194/gc-9-69-2026 · Cited by 1
Bayarassou, O., & Zhu, V. (2026) · International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing · doi:10.1108/ijphm-09-2025-0201 · Cited by 1
Wong, A., & Hung, Y.-C. (2026) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/s41262-026-00431-5 · Cited by 1
“Credibility, defined as the degree of trustworthiness and reliability of a source (Rogers and Bhowmik 1970), is assessed through three main indicators: expertise, trustwor - thiness, and goodwill (Hovland and Weiss 1951; Mccroskey and Teven, 1999).”
Kachembeho, R., Nyinondi, P. S., & Mnzava, E. E. (2026) · African Quarterly Social Science Review · doi:10.51867/aqssr.3.1.38 · Cited by 1
“Audiences evaluate credibility largely through va luations of a communicator’s expertise and trustworthiness, and, in some contexts, perceptions of goodwill or concern for the audience’s welfare (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
Do Credibility Statements Really Matter? Applying Truth-Default Theory to Public Speaking
Dubuisson, J. A., & Griffin, D. J. (2026) · Business and Professional Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/23294906261423491 · Cited by 1
Bridging the Legitimacy Gap Beyond Borders: Country-of-Origin Effects in Strategic CSR Communication
Song, B. (2026) · International Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/23294884261432088 · Cited by 1
To Disclose or Not to Disclose: How AI Use Transparency Increases Trust in Fact-Checking
Chung, M., Choi, J., & Jones-Jang, S. M. (2026) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2026.2656696 · Cited by 2
Grading in the Digital Age: AI Feedback Versus Professor Feedback
Russell, L. T. M., Zeiser, A. J., Mickler, R. D., & Winkel, D. E. (2026) · Journal of Marketing Education · doi:10.1177/02734753261440971 · Cited by 1
The Link Between Positive Organizational Communication and Motivating Language
Fuller, R. P. (2026) · New perspectives in organizational communication · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-06542-1_5 · Cited by 1
Szymkowiak, A., Szaban, M., & Plotkina, D. (2026) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116275 · Cited by 1
Just press “teach”? A longitudinal study of human expectations and responses to a robot instructor
Spence, P. R., Edwards, A. P., Edwards, C. C., & Westerman, D. (2026) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2026.2676286 · Cited by 1
Social Media Influencers and Mental Health Messaging: A Scoping Review
Lambert, K., Washika, W., Miller, A. N., Kayongo, C., Cook, J., Okoronkwo, C. E., McHugh, N., Todd, A. D., & Trnka, R. E. (2026) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2026.2692535 · Cited by 1
Li, X., Cui, W., Olatunji, S., & Piercy, C. W. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2692012 · Cited by 1
Functions of epistemic trust within the narratives of scientists with disabilities
Librea‐Carden, M. R., & Hall, J. L. (2026) · Pedagogies An International Journal · doi:10.1080/1554480x.2026.2691773 · Cited by 1
He, L., 梁瑞雪, & Zhao, Y. (2026) · Language Testing · doi:10.1177/02655322261459025 · Cited by 1
“The analysis of the interview data combined a top-down approach, in which the categorization of themes was informed by selected elements of the SCS, with a bottom-up approach that allowed new insights to emerge from the data.”
InfluentialAn analysis of coaching dimensions and their impact on athlete motivation and affective learning
Norris, M. R. (2010) · Cardinal Scholar (Ball State University) · Cited by 1
Finnestad, C. A. (2010) · ePlace - Preserving, Learning, and Creative Exchange (Asbury Theological Seminary) · Cited by 1
Succulent Sins, Personalized Politics, and Mainstream Media’s Tabloidization Temptation
Mackay, J. B., & Bailey, E. R. (2012) · International Journal of Technoethics · doi:10.4018/jte.2012100104 · Cited by 1
“Source credibility can be measured in terms of multiple dimensions: competence, care, and trustworthiness (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundMethodKeller, J. M., & Son, C. (2009) · DigiNole (Florida State University) · Cited by 1
Student Assessment of Professor Effectiveness
Knutson, R. E. (2014) · Cornerstone (Minnesota State University, Mankato) · Cited by 1
de Pano, J. C. G. (2011) · Journal of Southeast Asian Studies · Cited by 1
van Zuydam, S., Karsten, N., Oostendorp, H., Hoogstad, M., & van Kooten, F. (2018) · Bestuurskunde · doi:10.5553/bk/092733872018027003003 · Cited by 1
“Onderzoek uitgevoerd sinds de jaren vijftig laat keer op keer zien dat dit oordeel van drie typen betrouwbaarheid en betrokkenheid (Hovland kerneigenschappen afhangt: bekwaamheid, , Janis, & Kelley, 1953; Kouzes & Posner, 2011; McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundRamsey, R. (2018) · Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific) · Cited by 1
The effects of different types of virtual reality display on perception of a virtual presenter
Poage, F. (2019) · Cited by 1
Strom, W. (2020) · International Journal of Listening · doi:10.1080/10904018.2019.1705160 · Cited by 1
“Moreover, construct validity is supported by total scores correlating with McCroskey and Teven (1999) credibility scale (r = .56), and correlational analyses indicate criterion-related validity in the scale’s ability to predict target believability (r = .66) and likableness (r = .56) (Strom, 2003;…”
BackgroundNews story aggregation and perceived credibility
Diel, S., & Roberts, C. (2021) · Newspaper Research Journal · doi:10.1177/07395329211013488 · Cited by 2
“…credibility component measures of accuracy, completeness, objectivity, spin and professionalism were drawn from components of scales commonly used in credibility research (Austin & Dong, 1994; Flanagin & Metzger, 2007; Gaziano & McGrath, 1986; McCroskey & Teven, 2009; Meyer, 1988; Roberts, 2010).”
MethodA comunicação omnicanal das agências de viagens com os seus consumidores
Filipe, L., Ribeiro, R. B., & Fernandes, F. (2020) · Comunicação pública · doi:10.4000/cp.6928 · Cited by 1
Autorrevelación docente: una revisión de la literatura.
Froment, F., González, A. J. G., & Gómez-Millán, M. R. B. (2021) · Revista Fuentes · doi:10.12795/revistafuentes.2021.v23.i1.11383 · Cited by 1
Nonaccommodation and communication effectiveness: an application to instructional communication
Frey, T. K., & Lane, D. R. (2021) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824096.2021.1922372 · Cited by 1
“McCroskey and Teven (1999) argued that instructor credibility consists of three dimensions: competence, trustworthiness, and goodwill.”
BackgroundInformation Source, Media Credibility, and Epidemic Control in COVID-19 Pandemic
Liu, Y., & Li, X. (2021) · Journal of Emergency Management and Disaster Communications · doi:10.1142/s2689980921400017 · Cited by 1
Product Endorsement by Opinion Leaders: The Case of YouTube Community
Weinlich, P., & Semerádová, T. (2022) · Contributions to management science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-93131-5_8 · Cited by 1
Employing user-generated content to enhance human-robot interaction in a human-robot trust game
Liang, Y., & Lee, S. A. (2016) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2016.7451810 · Cited by 1
“Lastly, source credibility refers to the general believability of a communication source [8].”
BackgroundRodero, E. (2022) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2022.jul.06 · Cited by 1
Rodero, E., Larrea, O., & Mas, L. (2022) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2022.jul.05 · Cited by 4
Shi, J., Mucedola, A. S., Lin, T., & Green, K. N. (2022) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463373.2022.2133622 · Cited by 1
“Credibility was adapted using three dimensions from McCroskey and Teven (1999), which assessed perceived trustworthiness, competence, and goodwill of the politician on 7-point semantic differential scales.”
MethodMeade, L. (2022) · doi:10.54119/enqw1033 · Cited by 1
Johnson, Z. D., Suarez, M., & Alvarado, D. (2023) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824096.2023.2170344 · Cited by 1
“Through such communication coaches can display the character associated with credibility by regularly evidencing their work as a coach (see, McCroskey & Teven, 1999), rather than just shouting hurried instructions and information at the end of practice to athletes with the hope that it reaches back…”
Backgroundvan Loggerenberg, M. J. C., Chen, Z. F., Terblanche‐Smit, M., & Enslin, C. (2023) · European Advertising Academy · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-40429-1_11 · Cited by 1
The Effects of Food Vlog Attributes on Customers’ Recommendation Adoption
Razak, N. I. A., Zulkifly, M. I., Shahril, Z. R., Arsat, A., & Yusrini, L. (2023) · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences · doi:10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i5/17026 · Cited by 1
Kaup, S. (2023) · MedienPädagogik Zeitschrift für Theorie und Praxis der Medienbildung · doi:10.21240/mpaed/00/2023.08.25.x · Cited by 2
Hendrickson, B., & Goh, L. W. J. (2023) · Mobile Media & Communication · doi:10.1177/20501579231204716 · Cited by 1
“This fi nding has implications for understanding the role that individual smartphone acceptance plays in impacting perceptions of others ’ smartphone use and highlights the importance of distinguishing source credibility dimensions (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialde Pano, J. C. G. (2023) · Psychology of Language and Communication · doi:10.58734/plc-2023-0022 · Cited by 1
Parks, E. S. (2024) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751.2024.2316830 · Cited by 1
“Niceness has been positively described as someone having “ character ” or traits of “ sociability ” (McCroskey & Teven, 1999, p. 96), as “ nurturing, compassionate, empathetic, and sincere ” (Shugart, 2005, p. 60), and “ civility ” (Hawn, 2020).”
Isingizwe, J., Eiris, R., & Gheisari, M. (2024) · ASCE Construction Research Congress (CRC) · doi:10.1061/9780784485293.008 · Cited by 1
Zyberaj, J. (2024) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2024.2357366 · Cited by 2
“For support, i used the 20-item Panas scale of Watson et al. (1988), representing positive and negative affect, and a six-item scale of Mccroskey and teven (1999), representing goodwill.”
Rodero, E. (2024) · Radio Journal International Studies in Broadcast & Audio Media · doi:10.1386/rjao_00089_1 · Cited by 1
Um, N. (2024) · Journal of Digital Contents Society · doi:10.9728/dcs.2024.25.6.1507 · Cited by 1
Irvine, L., & Cunningham, S. (2024) · Student Success · doi:10.5204/ssj.3197 · Cited by 1
“Drawing on Aristotle’s persuasive appeal of ethos, McCroskey and Teven (1999) suggest this type of credibility is based on student perceptions of an educator’s competence, trustworthiness and goodwill (caring).”
BackgroundRynarzewska, A. I., Nafees, L., & Nikolov, A. N. (2024) · Marketing Education Review · doi:10.1080/10528008.2024.2406201 · Cited by 1
Cale, A., & McNulty, M. A. (2025) · Medical Science Educator · doi:10.1007/s40670-025-02447-z · Cited by 1
“Each domain includes six items on a seven-point semantic differential scale (e.g., 1 = inexpert, 7 = expert), with some items reverse-coded to encourage participants to focus and avoid straight line survey responses (i.e., one response value across all survey items) [19].”
InfluentialWicke, R., Ratcliff, C. L., Fleerackers, A., Wang, Y., King, A. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2025) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.70071 · Cited by 1
“Participants reported whether they found the researchers who conducted the study to be trustworthy , honest , and ethical , representing the trustworthiness dimension of source credibility (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
AI for Combatting Mis/Disinformation
Behm‐Morawitz, E., Warner, B. R., Riles, J. M., Josey, C. S., & Morawitz, R. (2025) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000480 · Cited by 1
Rubenking, B. E., Mayer, M., Looney, M., & Talton, W. (2025) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000483 · Cited by 1
Rudnick, J. J. (2012) · Cornerstone (Minnesota State University, Mankato) · Cited by 1
Punyanunt-Carter, N. M., & Carter, S. (2015) · Higher Learning Research Communications · doi:10.18870/hlrc.v5i2.188 · Cited by 1
Effect of robot's title in human-robot interaction
Jung, Y., Park, T., & Hong, A. (2014) · International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence · doi:10.1109/urai.2014.7057515 · Cited by 1
Dale Carnegie's Leadership Principles: Examining the Theoretical and Empirical Support
Basford, T. E., & Molberg, A. (2013) · Journal of Leadership Studies · doi:10.1002/jls.21265 · Cited by 1
Vicarious and Source Credibility: A Cross Cultural Explanation
Dilbeck, K. E. (2014) · UWM Digital Commons (University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee) · Cited by 1
Dix, A. (2015) · Sport Science Review · doi:10.1515/ssr-2015-0019 · Cited by 1
“…of the source credibility (McCroskey & Teven, 1999) of the headshot photograph of the black male athlete and then completed a separate pre-test measure that assessed their perceptions of the source credibility (McCroskey & Teven, 1999) of the original headshot photograph of the white male athlete.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDenault, V., & Cooren, F. (2016) · International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique · doi:10.1007/s11196-016-9496-3 · Cited by 1
How a Minimally Designed Robot can Help Implicitly Maintain the Communication Protocol
Youssef, K., & Okada, M. (2017) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-017-0398-7 · Cited by 1
“The participant answers different questionnaires on seven-point rating scales: 7 competence [51] (Cronbach’s α =.73) to evaluate the robot’s competence, the social face support [52] (Cronbach’s α = .81) to verify whether the user’s social face was supported during the HRI, and the robot’s…”
BackgroundDwyer, M., Sahay, S., Scott, C. R., Dadlani, P., & McKinley, E. (2017) · Western Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/10570314.2017.1302096 · Cited by 1
“honesty were assessed with a scale originally created by McCroskey and Teven (1999) to measure trustworthiness of others.”
BackgroundMethodBansah, A. K. (2020) · Acta Scientifci Nutritional Health · doi:10.31080/asnh.2020.04.0698 · Cited by 1
Does the Robot Get the Credit?
Finkel, M., Szczuka, J. M., & Krämer, N. C. (2020) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA) · doi:10.1145/3383652.3423894 · Cited by 1
“…of the robot’s trustworthiness and their perceptions of the robot’s caring orientation were assessed via the Source Credibility Measures on a five-step semantic differential, e.g. “Please rate your impression of the robot on these scales: dishonest – honest, untrustworthy – trustworthy” [12].”
MethodWritten in Code: Exploring the Negative Effects of Acronyms in News Headlines
Appelman, A. (2021) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2020.1867622 · Cited by 1
“The negative items were reverse-coded, and media source perceptions was the average of the responses (Study 1: Cronbach’s α = .85, M = 4.58, SD = .71; Study 2: Cronbach’s α = .88, M = 4.86, SD = 1.00) (McCroskey and Teven 1999).”
BackgroundInfluentialA Study on the Subsequent Measurement of Goodwill
Sang, X. (2021) · Annual International Conference on Social Science and Contemporary Humanity Development (SSCHD) · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.210121.110 · Cited by 1
The influence of learner behaviour on beginner teachers’ perceptions of their own credibility
Reddy, T., & Woest, Y. (2021) · Perspectives in Education · doi:10.18820/2519593x/pie.v39.i4.8
Come a Little Closer: Examining Spillover Priming Effects from a Network Perspective
Morin, D. T. (2013) · ScholarWorks@BGSU (Bowling Green State University) · Cited by 1
A comunicação omnicanal das agências de viagens com os seus consumidores
Filipe, L., Ribeiro, R. B., & Fernandes, F. (2020) · Comunicação pública · doi:10.4000/cp.12808 · Cited by 1
Kılıçer, K. (2022) · Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning · doi:10.31681/jetol.1099059 · Cited by 1
News coverage on terrorism : the influence of affect-laden images on information processing
Bruhn, D. (2009) · Cited by 1
The somatic marker as a “short cut” to verbal immediacy
Hickson, M., Turner, J., Powell, L., Neiva, E., & Adams, C. T. (2002) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824090209384867 · Cited by 1
Houston, B. W. (2014) · Aquila Digital Community (University of Southern Mississippi) · Cited by 1
Ratee Reactions: Negative Feedback as a Motivating Source
Kabins, A. H. (2012) · OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) · Cited by 1
Patel, H. (2015) · IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) · doi:10.7912/c2/897 · Cited by 1
Cherney, M. R. (2014) · doi:10.30707/etd2014.cherney.m · Cited by 1
Effects of Multicultural Advertising Strategies on Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions
Dam, L. (2016) · OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) · Cited by 1
Does Corporate Citizenship Influence Financial Reporting Credibility?
Azizan, S. (2018) · ANU Open Research (Australian National University) · doi:10.25911/5d611d836cb39 · Cited by 1
Dorsey, J. D. (2017) · The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) · doi:10.33915/etd.5506 · Cited by 1
Students' perceptions of classroom justice and their use of politeness strategies
Rudick, C. K. (2010) · doi:10.33915/etd.711 · Cited by 1
Strategic verbal aggression: Attacking the self-concept to enhance motivation in the classroom.
Heisel, A. D. (2000) · doi:10.33915/etd.9019 · Cited by 1
Tapping the invisible market: the case of the cruise industry
Park, S. Y. (2009) · OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries) · Cited by 1
Richards, O., & Landrum, A. R. (2020) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/vb3qs · Cited by 1
Pitts, S. (2022) · The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) · doi:10.33915/etd.11263 · Cited by 1
(2022) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-80382-271-620221019 · Cited by 1
Impact of Managerial Credibility on Employees’ Turnover’s IntentionsPreprint
Mehmood, U., & Siddiqui, J.-U.-R. (2023) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/pws7dp · Cited by 1
“By the virtue of this definition, competency as a trait is developed by the managers after spending considerable in their respective fields. Employees, especially during the nascent years of their careers, looked up to this trait of their managers. They wanted their manager to have the right knowledge, considerable ex…”
BackgroundInfluentialMaximizing Mental Health Communication
Siegel, J. T., & Yzer, M. C. (2025) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394179909.ch33 · Cited by 1
Cho-Li, Q., Men, L. R., Chu, H., Akanbi, F., & Kiousis, S. K. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5269957 · Cited by 1
Epistemic trust in online higher education : a mixed method phenomenological research study
Rapple, L. (2019) · Scholars Archive - University at Albany (University at Albany, State University of New York) · doi:10.54014/r2pr-wwpf · Cited by 1
Wagner, K. P. G. (2019) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/55g5-sz24
The effect of task and personal relevance on credibility judgements while searching on the Internet
Kirkyla, A. V. (2010) · Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) · doi:10.7282/t3ft8krb
Metadata
- Authors
- McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J.
- Affiliations
- West Virginia University (US)
- Northwest Missouri State University (US)
- Venue
- Communication Monographs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-103
- ISSN
- 0363-7751 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-5787
- OpenAlex
- W1992262987
- Cited by
- 1,236
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 100 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 36.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Communication Monographs (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Rhetoric and Communication Studies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Social Sciences › Communication › Interpersonal and Organizational Communication
- Keywords
- goodwill, ethos, source credibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review