The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement
Abstract
As a result of the controversy over the dimensionality of the ethos/source credibility construct and the associated plethora of empirical studies in the 1960s and 1970s, Aristotle's dimension of “goodwill” has been dismissed by many contemporary theorists and researchers. It is argued that this occurred as a result of errors made in the earlier empirical research and that “goodwill” can be measured, contrary to earlier claims, and should be restored to its former status in rhetorical communication theory. Empirical research is reported indicating the existence of the goodwill dimension as part of the structure of the ethos/source credibility construct and a measure of that dimension is provided with evidence for its reliability and validity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The scale originates from a widely cited study by McCroskey and Teven that validated a credibility scale composed of 3 related dimensions—goodwill (caring), competence, and trustworthiness [2].”
From Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada (2019) · cites this paper as [2]
Citations
Cites
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957) · Cited by 9,433
A Second Generation Little Jiffy
Kaiser, H. F. (1970) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291817 · Cited by 4,855
Norman, W. T. (1963) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0040291 · Cited by 2,619
(2017) · doi:10.5040/9798400682018.ch-003 · Cited by 2,248
Lumsdaine, A. A. (1954) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02713272 · Cited by 2,237
An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research
Stacks, D. W. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203887011 · Cited by 1,014
DIMENSIONS FOR EVALUATING THE ACCEPTABILITY OF MESSAGE SOURCES
Berlo, D. K., Lemert, J. B., & Mertz, R. J. (1969) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/267745 · Cited by 831
An Introduction to Rhetorical Communication
McCroskey, J. C. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315663791 · Cited by 746
Self-citationScales for the measurement of ethos
McCroskey, J. C. (1966) · Speech Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637756609375482 · Cited by 648
Self-citationEthos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades
McCroskey, J. C., & Young, T. J. (1981) · Central States Speech Journal · doi:10.1080/10510978109368075 · Cited by 571
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Koehn S.C., 1996, Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association
- Walter O., 1948, The measurement of ethos.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,000
Kelley, P. J. (2015) · Cited by 3
Accounting for rater credibility when evaluating construction industry service providers
Ekström, M. A. (2002) · Cited by 3
Website Evaluation Frameworks: IS oriented vs. Business Oriented Models
Keshavarz, H., & Givi, M. E. (2020) · International Conference on Web Research (ICWR) · doi:10.1109/icwr49608.2020.9122316 · Cited by 3
“Furthermore, some other dimensions like safety, qualification, and dynamism [6]. goodwill [34], agreeableness, extroversion (Norman, 1963), and professionalism [14] were mentioned in the literature.”
BackgroundRains, S. A. (2005) · Texas ScholarWorks (Texas Digital Library) · Cited by 3
Factors Influencing the Perceived Credibility of Public Relations Message Sources
Epega, T. O. (2008) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) · Cited by 3
Student perceptions of teacher emoticon usage: the effect on teacher credibility and liking
Adams, A. (2014) · California State University ScholarWorks (system-wide DSpace) · Cited by 3
Cultural and Cross-cultural Factors in Judgments of Credibility
Castillo, P. A. (2011) · Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO) · Cited by 3
Frymier, A. B. (2012) · The International Encyclopedia of Communication · doi:10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecl015 · Cited by 3
EXAMINING THE EFFECTS OF HOPE AND FEAR APPEALS ON COGNITIVE PROCESSING
Underhill, J. C. (2012) · University Libraries (University of Maryland) · Cited by 3
Bot Versus Humans: Who Can Challenge Corporate Hypocrisy on Social Media?
Armstrong, S. J., Neal, C., Tang, R., Rim, H., & Vraga, E. K. (2024) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051241292578 · Cited by 3
“This measure is adapted from the study by McCroskey and Teven (1999) ( α = .88, M = 4.11, SD = .75).”
InfluentialConnell, E., Landreville, K. D., Schultz, C. P., & Singh, R. L. (2024) · Journal of Creative Communications · doi:10.1177/09732586241295383 · Cited by 2
“Goodwill is an individual’s perceived caring (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
Enhancing source credibility measurement: addressing reverse-coded item bias
Sivo, S. A., Katt, J. A., Miller, A. N., & Edwards, O. W. (2025) · Educational Research and Evaluation · doi:10.1080/13803611.2025.2504006 · Cited by 2
“This would be our suggestion to McCroskey and Teven (1999), authors of the 18-item source credibility scale.”
Kim, J., Kelly, S. E., & Spence, P. R. (2025) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2025.2544831 · Cited by 2
“Given that credibility is a multidimensional constructor that consists of competence, caring, and trustworthiness (McCroskey & Teven, 1999), each dimension was measured.”
Li, J., & Shi, C. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1661328 · Cited by 2
“SCT highlights a positive pathway: Specified and expert sources can foster compliance because they heighten perceptions of credibility, including perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness (3, 4, 20).”
InfluentialChen, Y., & Zhang, R. (2026) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-07-2025-0512 · Cited by 3
Effectively communicating uncertainty: The persuasive impact of different types of hedges
Oba, D., Berger, J. A., & Boghrati, R. (2026) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcpy.70026 · Cited by 2
The Impact of Ability and Participation on Trustworthiness and Task Performance in Virtual Teams
Fuller, C. M., Twitchell, D. P., Marett, K., & Burns, A. J. (2012) · International Journal of Social and Organizational Dynamics in IT · doi:10.4018/ijsodit.2012040101 · Cited by 2
Perrault, E. K., & Hildenbrand, G. M. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16635 · Cited by 2
“Expertise was measured with six 7-point, semantic differential items also adapted from the source credibility scales of McCroskey and Teven [36] and Ohanian [37].”
MethodStudents as Information Responders and Creators during a University Shooting
Omilion‐Hodges, L. M., & Edwards, A. L. (2021) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2021.1952465 · Cited by 2
“Credibility is primarily composed of expertise, trustworthiness, and perceived goodwill (McCroskey & Teven, 1999), though it may include other attributes (e.g., source dynamism, likability, composure).”
BackgroundMethodYan, X., Bresnahan, M., Zhu, Y., & Hussain, S. A. (2021) · Journal of Intercultural Communication Research · doi:10.1080/17475759.2021.1982751 · Cited by 2
“Message sources have been well studied in the persuasion literature to influence message effects, and communicator trustworthiness has an important impact on how message receivers evaluate and accept messages (e.g., Fawcett et al., 2017; McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundMethodSalek, T. A. (2022) · Southern Communication Journal · doi:10.1080/1041794x.2022.2030788 · Cited by 2
“For example, McCroskey and Teven (1999) explain that goodwill can be understood generally as “perceived caring” or a discourse that “is seen then as a means of opening communication channels more widely” (p. 92).”
BackgroundCredibility, Ethics and Sustainable Marketing in Higher Education Institutions
Suleiman, J. (2021) · International Journal of Innovative Research and Development · doi:10.24940/ijird/2021/v10/i12/dec21016 · Cited by 2
What are the Drivers of Using Chatbots in Online Shopping A Cross-Country Analysis
Çelik, A. A., Hüseyinli, T., & Can, M. (2022) · Journal of Business Research - Turk · doi:10.20491/isarder.2022.1497 · Cited by 5
Finkel, M., & Krämer, N. C. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.993302 · Cited by 3
“Participants’ perceptions of the robot’s credibility were measured explicitly using the Source Credibility Measures (McCroskey and Teven, 1999).”
MethodPerrault, E. K., & McPhail, B. L. (2023) · Journal of religion and health · doi:10.1007/s10943-023-01836-1 · Cited by 2
“Six, 7-point semantic differential items adapted from McCroskey and Teven (1999) and Ohanian (1990) asked participants to rate where they felt Dr. Miller rated along the continuum for the following pairs of words: untrustworthy/trustworthy, phony/ genuine, insincere/sincere, unreliable/reliable,…”
MethodPerrault, E. K., McCullock, S. P., Hildenbrand, G. M., & Walter, K. J. (2023) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2023.2249625 · Cited by 2
“The extent to which participants trusted the physician they read about was measured using a scale adapted from McCroskey and Teven (1999).”
Teaching the Online Presentation: Aiming at Success
Reinsch, N. L., & Turner, J. W. (2023) · Business and Professional Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/23294906231202443 · Cited by 2
“We, therefore, drew on quantitative research and divided credibility into expertise, character, and goodwill (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundOverton, H. K., & Yang, F. (2023) · Journal of Communication Management · doi:10.1108/jcom-04-2023-0043 · Cited by 2
Arianti, F., & Hadiprawoto, T. R. (2024) · Indonesian Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship · doi:10.17358/ijbe.10.1.168 · Cited by 2
“The results of H3 align with the research conducted by (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialWeidmüller, L., & Engesser, S. (2024) · Communications · doi:10.1515/commun-2023-0020 · Cited by 7
Waddell, T. F., Sparks, J. F., & Moss, C. E. (2024) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2024.2337878 · Cited by 2
“Six semantic differential items on a 7-point scale were adapted from prior research (McCroskey & Teven, 1999) to measure the perceived competence of female journalists.”
MethodQureshi, N., Huilgol, S. S., Berdahl, C. T., Cohen, C. C., Mendel, P. J., & Fischer, S. H. (2024) · Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open · doi:10.1002/emp2.13243 · Cited by 2
“18,19 In general, clinicians balance their own assessments and heuristics with the credibility assessment of others when learning about and judging innovations.”
BackgroundPak, J., & Kim, H. S. (2024) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10776990241257588 · Cited by 2
谢, 楚. (2024) · Modern Management · doi:10.12677/mm.2024.148227 · Cited by 2
Karatas, N., Tanaka, T., Yoshihara, Y., Tanabe, H., Takeuchi, S., Yamamoto, T., Harazawa, M., & Kamiya, N. (2024) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3641308.3685039 · Cited by 2
“Participants also filled out the Source Credibility Measures (SCM) [13], and the Godspeed questionnaire [2] (for RHMI conditions only) to control the anthropomorphism differences between RoBoHoN and RHMI-P.”
Lloren-Alcantara, P. A., & Capistrano, E. P. S. (2024) · Asia Pacific Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.apmrv.2024.11.004 · Cited by 2
Variables influencing telemedicine utilization via telephone appointments among rural patients
García, E., Vincent, B. C., Thakur, S., Thakur, A., Zabiba, F., Agarwal, S., Cervantes, J. D., & Zabiba, A. (2025) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-12122-5 · Cited by 2
“Each of these latter traits, as uncovered by McCroskey and Teven [29], ultimately contributes to credibility.”
Prodused Ethos: The Co-production of Ethos and Expertise in Facebook Fan Sites for Health Experts
Kjeldsen, J. E., Just, S. N., & Mølster, R. (2025) · Rhetoric, politics and society · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-89075-8_7 · Cited by 2
Li, Q. L., Wang, L. H., Liu, X., & Metzger, M. J. (2025) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000484 · Cited by 2
Sharma, R., Aggarwal, A., & Saxena, N. (2025) · SN Business & Economics · doi:10.1007/s43546-025-00983-9 · Cited by 2
Examining audience reactions to brand journalism
Cole, J. T. (2012) · W. S. Hoole Special Collections Library Manuscript Collections · Cited by 2
Understanding the effect of conflicting information on medication adherence for vasculitis patients
Carpenter, D. M. (2019) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/yth1-rv24 · Cited by 2
Denner, N., Brocke, J., & Joeckel, S. (2016) · Studies in Communication and Media · doi:10.5771/2192-4007-2016-2-173 · Cited by 1
Wu, F. K. Y. (2016) · International Journal on Disability and Human Development · doi:10.1515/ijdhd-2016-0711 · Cited by 2
“However, students’ assurance of my care to every student, or as McCroskey and Teven [11] suggested the “perceived caring”, is seen as goodwill that opened the communication channel more widely in the classroom.”
BackgroundThe Influence of Being "Out" on Perceptions of Managerial Credibility and Positive Affect
Boren, J. P., & McPherson, M. B. (2009) · Scholar Commons (Santa Clara University) · Cited by 2
The Effects of Advertising Model Sources: The number of sources and model's Race on social inference
KimJaeHwi, 강윤희, & 부수현 (2008) · The Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology · doi:10.21074/kjlcap.2008.9.3.333 · Cited by 2
Telepresence Group Leaders Receive Higher Ratings of Social Attractiveness and Leadership Quality
Beattie, A. J., Edwards, C. C., & Williams, M. J. (2018) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3173386.3176952 · Cited by 2
“Credibility was measured using an 18-item scale [8].”
MethodPROPAGANDA HAK ANGKET DPR TERHADAP KPK (Analisis Propaganda dan Komunikasi Politik)
Kusuma, Y. P. (2017) · LONTAR Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi · doi:10.30656/lontar.v5i1.486 · Cited by 2
Bansah, A. K., Moore, D. R., & Holben, D. H. (2018) · Topics in Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1097/tin.0000000000000152 · Cited by 2
The Effect of Teachers’ Communication on Classroom Justice
Cho, Y. (2018) · Journal of Communication Research · doi:10.22174/jcr.2018.55.3.211 · Cited by 2
Ishii, K., Spence, P. R., & Hodges, W. R. (2021) · Communication Reports · doi:10.1080/08934215.2021.1918199 · Cited by 2
“This variable was assessed by the trustworthiness dimension of the Source Cred-ibility Scale (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
MethodPredicting Success of a Persuasion through Joint Modeling of Utterance Categorization
Sinha, M., & Dasgupta, T. (2021) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3459637.3482160 · Cited by 2
“A lot of studies have been done towards identifying such conversational strategies for a successful persuasive conversation [1, 18, 26].”
BackgroundA study of the relationship between online movie reviews and the intention to watch the movie
Shieh, H.-S., & Lin, S. (2022) · Journal of Economics and Management · doi:10.22367/jem.2022.44.14 · Cited by 4
“…extent of trust and belief in the source to others (Ganesan & Hess, 1997) and includes two dimensions: the knowledge of the source and the reliability of the source (Flanagin & Metzger, 2003; 2007; McCroskey & Teven, 1999; Metzger et al., 2003a, 2003b; Metzger & Flanagin, 2013; Pornpitakpan, 2004).”
BackgroundExploring Bias in Evaluation of Job Seeker Introductory Emails
Kelly, S. E., Gaytan, J. A., Morgan, S. D., Cundall, M. K., & Foresman, G. (2023) · Business and Professional Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/23294906231154853 · Cited by 2
“Trustworthiness is simply the degree to which a message receiver perceives that they can believe the source (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundInfluentialAn Analysis and Comparison of the Instructor-Student Relationship Using Relational Framing Theory
Frisby, B. N., Vallade, J. I., Huber, C. J., Tristan, A., & Murphy, A. A. (2023) · Western Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/10570314.2023.2183364 · Cited by 3
“The dimension of trust has also been an important part of instructor credibility (McCroskey et al., 1999).”
BackgroundLen-Ríos, M. E., Neumann, R., & Kim, S. (2023) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2023.2242826 · Cited by 2
“An aggregate measure was created adapted from a previous scale (McCroskey and Teven 1999).”
MethodIs Coming Out in the Community College Classroom an “Occupational Hazard?”
Sundblad, M. B., & Dansereau, D. R. (2023) · Community College Review · doi:10.1177/00915521231201166 · Cited by 2
“Immediately after the lecture, participants completed McCroskey and Teven’s (1999) Source Credibility Measure (SCM) (Appendix B), which includes 6 items for each of the three dimensions (character, competence, and caring), for a total of 18 items.”
MethodInfluentialPreliminary Findings on Developing a Scale for Credibility Assessment on Interactive Web Platforms
Choi, W., & Zhu, L. (2023) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.901 · Cited by 2
“To analyze each included article, we developed an initial coding scheme by mapping the indicators (items) used in validated scales (Gaziano & McGrath, 1986; McCroskey & Teven, 1999; Meyer, 1988) based on semantic similarity (Figure 1).”
MethodRamsey, M. C. (2023) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824096.2023.2292671 · Cited by 2
“Research examining the relationship between humor and source credibility, an audience’s image of a communicator’s competence, trustworthiness, and good-will (see McCroskey & Teven, 1999), has been inconclusive.”
BackgroundFuglsang, S. (2024) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edad045 · Cited by 2
Dynamic source credibility and its impacts on knowledge revision
Johnson, V. A., Butterfuss, R., & Kendeou, P. (2024) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-024-01562-3 · Cited by 2
“However, other researchers (e.g., Housholder & LaMarre, 2014; Lin et al., 2016; McCroskey & Teven, 1999) add on a third dimension, goodwill – namely the degree to which an audience perceives that a source cares about their well-being and has their best interests at heart.”
The "Drinking-Buddy" Scale and Perceptions of Assertiveness,Responsiveness and Authenticity
Powell, L., & Hickson, M. (2014) · Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs · doi:10.4172/2332-0761.1000134 · Cited by 2
Herzberger, J. D. (2014) · OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network) · Cited by 2
VanSickle-Ward, R., & Wallsten, K. J. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190675349.001.0001 · Cited by 9
Effects of reputation and aesthetics on the credibility of search engine results
Christiansen, B. C. (2013) · RIT Scholar Works (Rochester Institute of Technology) · Cited by 2
Perceived Cultural Proximity and Perceived News Source Credibility in Puerto Rico
Espina, C. (2013) · Syracuse University Libraries (Syracuse University) · Cited by 2
Hull, K. S. (2015) · OpenCommons at University of Connecticut (University of Connecticut) · Cited by 2
Bai, Y. L. (2017) · Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) · Cited by 2
Brophy, N. S. (2018) · doi:10.30707/etd2018.brophy.n · Cited by 2
The Effects of Instructor Self-Disclosure on Students’ Cognitive Learning: A Live Lecture Experiment
Kromka, S. M. (2020) · doi:10.33915/etd.7642 · Cited by 2
Watch your mouth: Swearing and credibility in the classroom
Mullins, E. (2020) · Holmes Museum Of Anthropology (Wichita State University) · Cited by 2
Spates, S. A. (2022) · The International Encyclopedia of Health Communication · doi:10.1002/9781119678816.iehc0766 · Cited by 2
Maibach, E. W., Uppalapati, S. S., Orr, M., & Thaker, J. J. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4201560 · Cited by 2
Factorial Structure of Web Credibility in a Population of Italian Internet Users: A Pilot Study
Lombardo, G., Caci, B., & Cardaci, M. (2009) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.104.2.660-666 · Cited by 1
Norman, C. S., Rose, A. M., Rose, J. M., Suh, I., & Xiao, X. (2021) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-2020-049 · Cited by 1
Clementson, D. E. (2022) · Communication Teacher · doi:10.1080/17404622.2022.2072922 · Cited by 1
“Goodwill is a seminal component of credibility for effective communication (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundClementson, D. E., & Beatty, M. J. (2022) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2022.2124920 · Cited by 1
“A person who is seen as having goodwill embodies a series of elements, according to McCroskey and Teven (1999): understanding people’s feelings, ideas, and needs; empathizing and identifying with people’s feelings; accepting and validating their views; and being responsive and attentive.”
InfluentialThe effects of using machine translation on perceptions of source credibility
Lehecka, T. (2023) · Pragmatics & beyond. New series · doi:10.1075/pbns.336.08leh · Cited by 1
Kauer, T., & Houser, M. L. (2023) · Journal of Communication Pedagogy · doi:10.31446/jcp.2023.1.08 · Cited by 1
Alsulaiman, S. A. (2023) · Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies · doi:10.30935/ojcmt/13783 · Cited by 1
Diwanji, V. S., Cortese, J., & Merle, P. F. (2023) · International Journal of Strategic Communication · doi:10.1080/1553118x.2023.2231409 · Cited by 1
Noguchi, N., Yokoi, R., Masu, T., Watanabe, M., Itoh, S., & Yumoto, S. (2023) · Vaccine X · doi:10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100411 · Cited by 1
“Furthermore, it may be worth analyzing these survey data using a scale of source credibility or goodwill, as reported by McCroskey and Teven [42].”
MethodHow political consultants can leverage partisan media combativeness in the U.S.
Clementson, D. E., & Zhao, W. (2024) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909882.2024.2415563 · Cited by 1
“Perceived trustworthiness of the politician was measured with McCroskey and Teven ’ s (1999) scale (Cronbach ’ s α = .897, M = 4.38, SD = 1.07, Skewness = 0.21, Kurtosis = − 0.28).”
InfluentialTan, D. (2024) · Business and Professional Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/23294906241298927 · Cited by 1
“In their investigation of Aristotle’s dimension of goodwill , McCroskey and Teven (1999) confirmed that goodwill is very much a part of a speaker’s credibility.”
InfluentialFactors Influencing Human Trust Towards Robots: A Scoping Review
Vindolet, C., Djamal, A., Guadarrama-Olvera, J. R., & Cheng, G. (2025) · Springer proceedings in advanced robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-81688-8_16 · Cited by 1
Johnson, K. A., & John, B. S. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-75364-0_5 · Cited by 1
Lee, H. M., Hua, P., Alayoubi, R., & Sundar, S. S. (2025) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3706599.3719749 · Cited by 1
“[19] ( M = 4.93, SD = 0.75, cron-bach’s alpha = .79).”
InfluentialPrettner, R., Molder, H. T., & Robinson, J. D. (2025) · SSM - Qualitative Research in Health · doi:10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100576 · Cited by 1
Alotaibi, I. S. (2025) · Management & Sustainability An Arab Review · doi:10.1108/msar-12-2024-0223 · Cited by 3
Hernandez, M. S., & Murcia, R. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1602187 · Cited by 1
Godovich, S. A., Goeke‐Morey, M. C., Barrueco, S., Guajardo, K. B., & Rich, B. A. (2025) · Child & Youth Care Forum · doi:10.1007/s10566-025-09882-4 · Cited by 1
Contagious Smiles on Screen. The Role of Emotional Alignment of TV Presenters
Rodero, E. (2025) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2025.2544559 · Cited by 1
“Credibility was analyzed using the McCroskey and Teven credibility scale (McCroskey & Teven, 1999) with three variables: competence, trustworthiness, and goodwill.”
Perceptions of female soccer announcers – is the gender gap closing?
Olgemöller, M., & Schupfner, T. (2025) · European Journal for Sport and Society · doi:10.1080/16138171.2025.2556503 · Cited by 1
“Scale items were thoroughly validated using an internal consistency check, with Cronbach’s alpha revealing a solid score of α = .85 for announcer competence (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
Credibility and/or anxiety - The moderators of political information on migration
Morgenstern, S. (2025) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103256 · Cited by 2
Beauty and the Bot: Perceptions of Human and AI Fitness Influencers on Instagram
Edwards, C. C., Edwards, A. P., Rijhwani, V., Mostafa, H. K., Ebo, D., & Doku, D. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2558025 · Cited by 5
“The Measure of Source Credibility (McCroskey & Teven, 1999) was modified to be an 18-item measure designed to evaluate perceptions of credibility across the three dimensions: competence (6 items; e.g., “intelligent/unintelligent”), character (6 items; e.g., “trustworthy/untrustworthy”), and caring…”
InfluentialShort-Form Video Content in African Digital Marketing
Anning‐Dorson, T. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-97210-2_6 · Cited by 1
Colclasure, B. C., Ruth, T. K., Beasley, V., & Granberry, T. (2025) · Trends in Higher Education · doi:10.3390/higheredu4040059 · Cited by 1
“Students’ perceptions of instructors were measured through three sub-constructs (competence, goodwill, and trustworthiness), which are measures of credibility [49].”
InfluentialFamiliarity Matters: Examining the Effects of AI-Generated Images on Science Information Credibility
Eom, D., Middleton, L. A., Luo, S., Li, N., & Brossard, D. (2025) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470251380116 · Cited by 1
Let’s tok politics: Partisan expectations of political news on TikTok
Sparks, J. F., & Hutchens, M. J. (2025) · Atlantic Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/15456870.2025.2590451 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J.
- Affiliations
- West Virginia University (US)
- Northwest Missouri State University (US)
- Venue
- Communication Monographs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-103
- ISSN
- 0363-7751 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-5787
- OpenAlex
- W1992262987
- Cited by
- 1,236
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 100 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 36.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Communication Monographs (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Rhetoric and Communication Studies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Social Sciences › Communication › Interpersonal and Organizational Communication
- Keywords
- goodwill, ethos, source credibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review