The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement
Abstract
As a result of the controversy over the dimensionality of the ethos/source credibility construct and the associated plethora of empirical studies in the 1960s and 1970s, Aristotle's dimension of “goodwill” has been dismissed by many contemporary theorists and researchers. It is argued that this occurred as a result of errors made in the earlier empirical research and that “goodwill” can be measured, contrary to earlier claims, and should be restored to its former status in rhetorical communication theory. Empirical research is reported indicating the existence of the goodwill dimension as part of the structure of the ethos/source credibility construct and a measure of that dimension is provided with evidence for its reliability and validity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The scale originates from a widely cited study by McCroskey and Teven that validated a credibility scale composed of 3 related dimensions—goodwill (caring), competence, and trustworthiness [2].”
From Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada (2019) · cites this paper as [2]
Citations
Cites
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957) · Cited by 9,433
A Second Generation Little Jiffy
Kaiser, H. F. (1970) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291817 · Cited by 4,855
Norman, W. T. (1963) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0040291 · Cited by 2,619
(2017) · doi:10.5040/9798400682018.ch-003 · Cited by 2,248
Lumsdaine, A. A. (1954) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02713272 · Cited by 2,237
An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research
Stacks, D. W. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203887011 · Cited by 1,014
DIMENSIONS FOR EVALUATING THE ACCEPTABILITY OF MESSAGE SOURCES
Berlo, D. K., Lemert, J. B., & Mertz, R. J. (1969) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/267745 · Cited by 831
An Introduction to Rhetorical Communication
McCroskey, J. C. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315663791 · Cited by 746
Self-citationScales for the measurement of ethos
McCroskey, J. C. (1966) · Speech Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637756609375482 · Cited by 648
Self-citationEthos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades
McCroskey, J. C., & Young, T. J. (1981) · Central States Speech Journal · doi:10.1080/10510978109368075 · Cited by 571
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Koehn S.C., 1996, Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association
- Walter O., 1948, The measurement of ethos.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,000
Breaking Bad in Business Education: Impacts on Student Incivility and Academic Dishonesty
Offstein, E. H., & Chory, R. M. (2016) · Business and Professional Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/2329490616671709 · Cited by 8
Maintaining Fairness When a Student Goes Afoul of Classroom Rules: A Procedural Justice Model
Whalen, D. J., & Koernig, S. K. (2009) · Marketing Education Review · doi:10.1080/10528008.2009.11489071 · Cited by 8
Mikkelson, A. C., Sloan, D., & Hesse, C. (2017) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824096.2017.1340265 · Cited by 8
“Credibility is comprised of three dimensions: competence, goodwill, and trustworthiness (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundThe use of legal and social sanctions as a norming influence on texting while driving
Kim, H. S., & Wang, W. (2020) · International Journal of Health Promotion and Education · doi:10.1080/14635240.2020.1819855 · Cited by 8
“This message credibility scale, adapted from previous studies (Berlo, Lemert, Mertz, 1970; McCroskey and Teven 1999), was reliable (α = .96, M = 4.89, SD = 1.41).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNew perspective on informal knowledge sharing in the self-service environment
van Tonder, E., Beer, L. T. D., & Kuyper, T. (2018) · Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2018.1560425 · Cited by 8
“They found that source expertise and trustworthiness are fundamental to the concept of source credibility (McCroskey & Teven, 1999, p. 90; Ohanian, 1990, p. 41).”
BackgroundSpates, S. A., Kaufmann, R., Lin, X., Lachlan, K. A., & Spence, P. R. (2020) · Southern Communication Journal · doi:10.1080/1041794x.2020.1770319 · Cited by 8
“McCroskey and Teven (1999) source credibility scale with three dimensions (i.e., competence, goodwill, and trustworthiness) were used.”
MethodTowards a New Definition of Trust for Teaching in Higher Education
National University of Singapore, & Zhou, Z. (2023) · International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.20429/ijsotl.2023.17202 · Cited by 9
Hong, Y., Lee, N., Kirkpatrick, C. E., Hu, S., Lee, S., & Hinnant, A. (2024) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2024.2346680 · Cited by 7
“Research has conceptualized source credibility as a three-dimensional construct: competence, trustworthiness, and goodwill (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
Candello, E., & Mohammadpour, M. (2024) · Journal of Communication Management · doi:10.1108/jcom-02-2024-0029 · Cited by 10
Understanding student burnout in quantitative reasoning courses
Kelly, S. E., Minuci, E., Ducking, J., & Romero, A. (2024) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463373.2024.2438835 · Cited by 7
“Credibility is the extent to which a communicator is perceived to be believable, which is assessed by the extent to which the communicator is perceived to be trustworthy, competent, and caring toward the audience member (McCroskey & Teven, 1999; S. A. Myers & Martin, 2017; Teven & Katt, 2016).”
Communicating through #hashtags: Influencing perceptions of personality and trust
Khurana, P., & Krishnan, A. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2025.108623 · Cited by 7
Zeng, H.-K., & Lin, C. A. (2025) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer20030168 · Cited by 15
Besley, J. C., Gonzalez, A., & Tiffany, L. A. (2025) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102192 · Cited by 7
Understanding Reader Perception Shifts upon Disclosure of AI Authorship
Nakano, H., Takezawa, J., Matulic, F., Yang, C.-L., & Yatani, K. (2026) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3742413.3789076 · Cited by 17
“Trustworthiness (6 statements), Caring/Goodwill (6 statements), and Competence (6 statements) were adapted from McCroskey and Teven [32], and responses ranged from -3 (very negative) to +3 (very positive).”
Charoensap-Kelly, P. (2021) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/ijcma-08-2020-0137 · Cited by 7
The effect of an empathy-eliciting intervention on the perception of telepresence robot users *
Asadi, A., & Fischer, K. (2023) · IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO) · doi:10.1109/arso56563.2023.10187570 · Cited by 7
“Then, in line with the findings by [1], which found the trustworthiness of telepresence robot operators is rated generally lower than that of co-present participants, we used the trustworthiness questionnaire items from McCroskey and Teven [27].”
MethodCelebrity political party endorsement and voter behaviour: a post-election empirical evidence
Senanu, B., Amu, P. Y., & Mensah, H. A. (2023) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2023.2244510 · Cited by 7
“These include qualities like attractiveness and dynamism, competence and objectivity, safety, similarity, and understanding and homophily (Brann and Leezer Himes 2010; Kamins et al. 1989, 1989; Kertz and Ohanian 1992; McCroskey and Teven 1999; Ohanian 1990).”
Finkel, M., & Krämer, N. C. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100018 · Cited by 10
Bark, M. J., Gasparello, G. G., Hartmann, G. C., Júnior, S. L. M., Acciaris, F., Pithon, M. M., & Tanaka, O. M. (2024) · Clinical Oral Investigations · doi:10.1007/s00784-023-05416-1 · Cited by 7
The future might be female: how does the public perceive experts?
Bundi, P., Hanimann, A., Portmann, L., & Varone, F. (2024) · Journal of European Public Policy · doi:10.1080/13501763.2024.2324014 · Cited by 10
“Scholars disagree on which dimensions are relevant (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
Perrault, E. K. (2018) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2018.1465492 · Cited by 7
“Trustworthiness of the provider was measured using items adapted from source credibility scales of McCroskey and Teven (1999) and Ohanian (1990).”
MethodEffects of gender and verbal aggression on perceptions of U.S. political speakers
Nau, C., & Stewart, C. O. (2018) · Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict · doi:10.1075/jlac.00006.nau · Cited by 7
Narrative storytelling and anger in crisis communication
Clementson, D. E., & Tong, X. (2020) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824096.2020.1811660 · Cited by 7
Lin, X., Kaufmann, R., Spates, S. A., Lachlan, K. A., & Spence, P. R. (2021) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2021.1957138 · Cited by 7
“McCroskey and Teven ’ s (1999) source credibility scale with three dimensions (i.e., competence, goodwill, and trustworthiness) was used.”
Messages in Conflict: Examining Leadership Communication during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the U.S.
Sellnow‐Richmond, D. D., Lukacovic, M. N., Sellnow-Richmond, S. A., & Kraushaar, L. (2021) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research · doi:10.30658/jicrcr.4.3.2 · Cited by 7
“…refers to the perception that a person will indeed tell the truth if they know it, expertise or competence refers to the perception that a person does know the truth, and goodwill or caring refers to the perception or belief that a person cares about the perceiver (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundLim, A., Young, R. L., & Brewer, N. (2022) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3942 · Cited by 9
Chen, L., Dong, C., & Zhang, Y. (2022) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440221093046 · Cited by 7
“Source credibility is composed of three elements: expertise, trustworthiness, and intention toward the receiver (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundAntecedents and Effects of Online Third-Party Information on Offline Impressions
Lane, B. L., Cionea, I. A., Dunbar, N. E., & Carr, C. T. (2022) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000360 · Cited by 7
Students’ perception of an instructor: The effects of instructor accommodation to student swearing
Allard, A., & Holmstrom, A. J. (2023) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101562 · Cited by 7
Priest as Teacher III: Parishioners’ Responsiveness and Priests’ Vocational Qualities
Horan, S. M., & Raposo, P. C. J. (2015) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463373.2015.1039715 · Cited by 7
“Conveying credibility entails managing perceptions of competence, goodwill, and trustworthiness (J. McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundCommunicator virtue and vice: Neglected constructs of relational communication?
Strom, B. (2002) · New Jersey Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/15456870209367417 · Cited by 7
Peifer, J. T. (2015) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205436.2015.1072723 · Cited by 9
“Specifically, McCroskey and Teven (1999) posited that credibility is animated by three dimensions: competence, trustworthiness, and goodwill.”
BackgroundEnhancing Teacher Credibility: What We Can Learn From the Justice and Leadership Literature
Ritter, B., Hedberg, P. R., & Gower, K. (2016) · Organization Management Journal · doi:10.1080/15416518.2016.1152457 · Cited by 7
“Defined as an attitude characterized by belief in instructor, instructor credibility includes competence, character, and caring dimensions (Chory, 2007; Frymier & Thompson, 1992; McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundInstructor Response to Uncivil Behaviors in the Classroom: An Application of Politeness Theory
Yrisarry, N., Neuberger, L., & Miller, A. N. (2019) · Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.14434/josotl.v19i4.24505 · Cited by 7
“Since the time of Aristotle, source credibility has been assumed to be comprised of three dimensions: intelligence, character, and goodwill—now more commonly called competence, trustworthiness, and caring (McCroskey & Teven, 1999; Teven & McCroskey, 1997).”
BackgroundMeinert, J., Aker, A., & Krämer, N. (2019) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2019.313 · Cited by 7
“credibility is a perceptual variable related to trustworthiness, competence [21] and goodwill [22] of the communicator.”
BackgroundAppropriate humor and confirmation as instructor rapport-building behaviors
Tatum, N. T. (2021) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824096.2021.1930528 · Cited by 7
“Instructional communication researchers have long argued that when students feel seen or cared for by their instructors, the instructor–student relationship is strengthened and positive affective responses are produced (e.g., instructor caring; McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundPersuasion and Pragmatics: An Empirical Test of the Guru Effect Model
Martin, J. S., Summerville, A. L., & Wickline, V. B. (2016) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-016-0317-0 · Cited by 7
Clark-Gordon, C. V., & Goodboy, A. K. (2019) · Western Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/10570314.2019.1649453 · Cited by 7
“Credibility Instructor credibility was measured using McCroskey and Teven’s (1999) 18-item Measure of Source Credibility Scale.”
MethodCommunicator Virtue and its Relation to Marriage Quality
Strom, B. (2003) · Journal of Family Communication · doi:10.1207/s15327698jfc0301_02 · Cited by 7
Approachability and Credibility of Virtual Character Faces: The Role of the Horizontal Viewing Angle
So, C., & Jung, K. (2023) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208231153492 · Cited by 7
“Although the original construct encompassed the additional facet of goodwill (McCroskey & Teven, 1999), credibility has been predominantly conceptualized by expertise and trust-worthiness (Kohring & Matthes, 2007; Newell & Goldsmith, 2001).”
BackgroundValentini, C., Munnukka, J., & Zhao, H. (2024) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2024.08.003 · Cited by 6
EFL Learner Perceptions and Engagement of a Customized AI-led Class
Lee, S. (2024) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/00336882241268662 · Cited by 7
“According to McCroskey and Teven (1999), instructor credibility is a composite encompassing competence, trustworthiness, and goodwill.”
Beyond Mere Algorithm Aversion: Are Judgments About Computer Agents More Variable?
Buder, J., Becker, F., Bareiß, J., & Huff, M. (2024) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502241303588 · Cited by 8
van Eck, C. W., & van der Meer, T. G. L. A. (2025) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625251314159 · Cited by 8
“Scientists’ credibility was measured with an 8-item 7-point Likert-type scale of Kotcher et al. (2017), derived from McCroskey and Teven (2009).”
Cha, J. (2024) · The International Journal on Media Management · doi:10.1080/14241277.2025.2481826 · Cited by 6
“Adapting the definition of source credibility by McCroskey and Teven (1999), the present study defines the credibility of a news source on social media as an individual’s judgments about the competence, trustworthiness, and goodwill of the entity that generated the news in the first place.”
Kim, Y., & Lim, H. D. (2025) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2025.2485368 · Cited by 7
“…credibility, conceptualized as the believability of a speaker (aligned with Aristotle’s ethos concept); and message credibility/information credibility, which denotes believability of the information itself (similar to Aristotle’s logos concept) (McCroskey & Teven, 1999; Metzger & Flanagin, 2013).”
Rheu, M. (., & Cho, J. (2025) · Proceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706599.3719681 · Cited by 9
“Perceived credibility is defined as users’ perception that a technology’s functionality and performance are trustworthy, expert, and reliable [19, 39].”
Student Evaluations of Instructor Email Response Speed as Chronemic Expectancy Violations
Tatum, N. T. (2021) · Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange · doi:10.18785/jetde.1401.03 · Cited by 6
Generalisiertes Vertrauen in automatisierten Journalismus
Körner, T. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-42735-1 · Cited by 6
The Role of Gender in Evaluating Athletes’ Endorsements of Corporate Social Advocacy Initiatives
Brown, K. A., Jackson, J. R., Quick, M., & Harrison, V. R. (2024) · Communication & Sport · doi:10.1177/21674795241227764 · Cited by 6
“Athlete endorser credibility was measured using an 18-item, 7-point Likert scale adapted from McCroskey and Teven ’ s (1999) revision of McCroskey ’ s (1966) source credibility scale.”
InfluentialOrem, M., Leggette, H. R., Parrella, J. A., Lu, P., Palmer, K., Foster, J., Neely, H. L., & Noland, R. L. (2025) · Journal of Applied Communications · doi:10.4148/1051-0834.2553 · Cited by 6
“The concept of goodwill originated with the Aristotelian concept of ethos (Hunt & Wald, 2020; McCroskey & Teven, 1999; Teven, 2008).”
Holland, C., & Judge, M. (2012) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-2851-9.ch001 · Cited by 6
Komunikasi Persuasif dan Penerapannya di Daya Tarik Wisata Tebing Keraton
Novianti, E., Endyana, C., Lusiana, E., Wulung, S. R. P., & Desiana, R. (2020) · Tornare Journal of Sustainable and Research · doi:10.24198/tornare.v2i3.29694 · Cited by 6
Batastini, A. B., Vitacco, M. J., Jones, A. C. T., & Davis, R. M. (2021) · International Journal of Forensic Mental Health · doi:10.1080/14999013.2021.1880504 · Cited by 6
“Credibility, measures whether a source is not only genuine and moral, but also has some expertise (e.g., is smart, educated; McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
Adame, B. J., Adame, E. A., Zanin, A. C., Martinez, L. V., & Corman, S. R. (2021) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909882.2021.1990373 · Cited by 6
“Subsumed in these dimensions are other markers of credibility, including authority, expertise, likeability, and others that may influence the receiver’s source perceptions (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundAssociations between perceived source credibility, e-cigarettes, and e-cigarette ad perceptions
Lee, D. N., Liu, J., Keller-Hamilton, B. L., Patterson, J. G., Wedel, A. V., Vázquez‐Otero, C., & Stevens, E. M. (2022) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101862 · Cited by 7
“Perceived source credibility was assessed by using an adapted semantic differential scale (McCroskey and Teven, 1999).”
MethodPatients as Feedback Providers: Exploring Medical Students’ Credibility Judgments
Eijkelboom, C., de Kleijn, R. A. M., van Diemen, W. J. M., Maljaars, C. D. N., van der Schaaf, M. F., & Frenkel, J. (2023) · Perspectives on Medical Education · doi:10.5334/pme.842 · Cited by 10
Liao, M. (2023) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2023.2206662 · Cited by 7
“News recommender system credibility was measured by adopting the source credibility scale from McCroskey and Teven (1999), which encompasses two aspects of source credibility, namely competence (whether the source has the required knowledge and expertise in the task) and trust (whether the source…”
MethodThe Development of an Online Research Tool to Investigate Children’s Social Bonds with Robots
Veenstra, D. N., & Evers, V. (2011) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-19385-9_3 · Cited by 6
“Four items (trustworthiness, honesty, intelligence and care) were inspired by McCrosskey’s source credibility scale [25].”
MethodReceptive to bad reception: Jerky motion can make persuasive messages more effective
Patel, H., Bayliss, L. C., Ivory, J., Woodard, K., McCarthy, A., & MacDorman, K. F. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.012 · Cited by 6
“…related outcomes could be increased, including attention to claims (i.e., operationalized as retention of relevant message details), and opinions about the message source's warmth (or trustworthiness), competence, and degree of goodwill (Fiske, Cuddy, & Glick, 2007; McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundThe Perception and Use of Electronic Banking among Business Executives in Lagos State, Nigeria
Adelowo, O. T. (2015) · Greener Journal of Business and Management Studies · doi:10.15580/gjbms.2015.2.051114389 · Cited by 6
Designing and Testing Credibility: The Case of a Serious Game on Nightlife Risks
Gamberini, L., Nucci, M., Zamboni, L., DeGiuli, G., Cipolletta, S., Villa, C. M., Monarca, V., Candigliota, M., Pirotto, G., Leclerq, S., et al. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78978-1_18 · Cited by 5
Grounding Twenty-first-Century Public Relations Praxis in Aristotelian Ethos
Ofori, D. M. (2019) · Journal of Public Relations Research · doi:10.1080/1062726x.2019.1634074 · Cited by 6
“As McCroskey and Teven (1999) have observed, goodwill is key to winning audience members over because it involves speakers’ “understanding, empathy, and responsiveness” toward them (p. 92).”
BackgroundArtificial intelligence snapchat: Visual conversation agent
Arsovski, S., Cheok, A. D., Govindarajoo, K., Salehuddin, N., & Vedadi, S. (2020) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-019-01621-2 · Cited by 6
“As instruments in our study we use questionnaire designed by [15] to measure source credibility and questionnaire designed by [14] to measure the interpersonal attraction.”
BackgroundMethodInstructor accounts and sincere amends following integrity- and competence-based misbehavior
Vallade, J. I. (2020) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2020.1788105 · Cited by 6
Politeness in security directives: Insights in browser compliance for the human element
House, D., & Giordano, G. (2020) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2020.102007 · Cited by 6
Influence of fashion blogs on technology-driven behaviour of millennial
Zafar, F., & Sarwar, A. (2021) · International Journal of Fashion Design Technology and Education · doi:10.1080/17543266.2021.1958927 · Cited by 6
“For perceived influencer credibility, five items of McCroskey and Teven (1999) were used.”
MethodDai, Z., & MacDorman, K. F. (2021) · Frontiers in Virtual Reality · doi:10.3389/frvir.2021.739038 · Cited by 8
Chen, C.-H., & Phan, N. T. T. (2021) · Pertanika journal of social science & humanities · doi:10.47836/pjssh.29.2.05 · Cited by 6
Credibility and Interactivity: Persuasive Components of Ideological Group Websites
Johnson, G., Taylor, W. D., Ness, A. M., Ault, M. K., Dunbar, N. E., Jensen, M. L., & Connelly, S. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_13 · Cited by 6
Persuasion about Health Risks: Evidence, Credibility, Scientific Flourishes, and Risk Perceptions
Hample, D., & Hample, J. (2014) · Argumentation and Advocacy · doi:10.1080/00028533.2014.11821836 · Cited by 6
Sellnow, D. D. (2025) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394180844.ch43 · Cited by 6
Lawson, B. T., Chadwick, A., Hall, N.-A., & Vaccari, C. (2024) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2024.2400141 · Cited by 5
“This assessment may be positive when people think their peer has ‘goodwill’ – experience of past interactions that create solidaristic social bonds (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
Liu, J., & Zhang, L. (2025) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2025.102564 · Cited by 5
Ji, D., Giles, H., & Hu, W. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15040560 · Cited by 5
“Teacher credibility (CR) was a revised version of McCroskey and Teven (1999).”
Six elements of effective public engagement with science
Garlick, S. R., Besley, J. C., Peterman, K., Black-Maier, A. C., Downs, M. R., Franco, E. O., Groffman, P. M., Lavallee, A., O’Connell, K. B., Storksdieck, M., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1002/fee.70014 · Cited by 5
Cionea, I. A., Gilmore, B. N., Machette, A. T., & Kavya, P. (2022) · Western journal of communication · doi:10.1080/10570314.2022.2135386 · Cited by 3
“Instructor credibility is often assumed in feedback situations and consists of competence, character or trustworthiness, and caring or goodwill (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundMethodvan Meurs, T., de Koster, W., van der Waal, J., & Groeniger, J. O. (2022) · European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckae013 · Cited by 5
“18 The items are as follows: These organizations are (i) honest; (ii) trustworthy; (iii) genuine.”
BackgroundCruz, S. M., & Carpenter, C. J. (2024) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x241291572 · Cited by 7
“Source credibility was evaluated using McCroskey ’ s scales, which evaluate perceptions of a source ’ s competence, trustworthiness, and goodwill (McCroskey, 1966; McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
InfluentialAI and human generation of classroom content: adult learners’ perceptions
Frederick, A., Lin, X., Edwards, C. C., & Edwards, A. P. (2025) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2025.2466502 · Cited by 5
“After reading the lecture notes, participants in all three conditions received a questionnaire containing the following measures: (a) McCroskey and Teven’s (1999) Measure of Source Credibility, (b) McCroskey and McCain’s (1974) Measure of Interpersonal Attraction, (c) social presence was assessed with six items modifi…”
The character of scientists in the Nobel Prize speeches
Condit, C. M. (2018) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662518756559 · Cited by 5
“…literature testing this theory has been fraught with conflicting definitions and confounding nonverbal factors, taken as a whole, the evidence confirms that Aristotle’s observation-based theories were broadly correct (McCroskey and Teven, 1999; for complexities see May, 1988; Pornpitakpan, 2004).”
BackgroundL’impact de l’influence sociale sur l’intention d’usage des objets connectés pour le sport
Samhale, K., & Ladwein, R. (2019) · Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication · doi:10.4000/rfsic.5966 · Cited by 5
Are Presidential Candidates Impervious to Deception Detection? A Test of Voters' Truth‐Default
Clementson, D. E., & Tong, X. (2022) · Presidential Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/psq.12809 · Cited by 6
The cognition, information behaviors, and preventive behaviors of Taiwanese people facing COVID-19
Yueh, H., Wang, G.-Y., & Lee, T. S. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-20312-6 · Cited by 5
English-major students’ construction of academic sense of belonging: A metaphoric exploration
Parsaiyan, S. F., & Karimi, A. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102236 · Cited by 5
Jang, Y., Kim, T., Kwon, H., Park, H. H., & Kim, K. J. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642568 · Cited by 5
Using Short-Form Videos to Get Clinical Trial Newcomers to Sign Up: Message-Testing Experiment
Hu, S., Kirkpatrick, C. E., Lee, N., Hong, Y., Lee, S., & Hinnant, A. (2024) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/49600 · Cited by 5
“McCroskey and Teven [21] suggested that 3 key components comprise credibility: competence, trustworthiness, and goodwill.”
Kjeldsen, J. E., & Hess, A. (2025) · Western Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/10570314.2025.2487900 · Cited by 8
“Such theoretical struggles as recognized by theorists across rhetoric (Amossy, 2001; Aristotle, 2007) and the social sciences (McCroskey, 1966; McCroskey & Teven, 1999; McCroskey & Young, 1981) can be alleviated through a more robust accounting of the dynamic and relational character of ethos.”
Phishing Attacks Over Time: A Longitudinal Study
Harris, A. L., & Yates, D. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 5
Syarief, A., & Hibino, H. (2007) · ITB Journal of Visual Art and Design · doi:10.5614/itbj.vad.2007.1.1.1 · Cited by 5
“These measures were modified based on the concept of credibility measures by McCroskey et al [9].”
BackgroundInfluentialLisa, L.-I. H. (2014) · International Journal of English Language Education · doi:10.5296/ijele.v2i2.5548 · Cited by 5
“The role of source credibility in communication, or in-class lecture delivery has been studied extensively by many researchers (McCroskey & Teven, 1999; McCroskey & Young, 1981; Self, 1996; Teven, 2001).”
BackgroundInfluentialHolbert, R. L. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.53 · Cited by 5
Komunikace ve školní třídě a žákovské učení
Sedláček, M., & Šeďová, K. (2015) · ORBIS SCHOLAE · doi:10.14712/23363177.2015.73 · Cited by 5
Morin, D. (2018) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.17040202 · Cited by 5
“This credibility measure was borrowed and adapted from several sources [i.e. McCroskey and Teven, 1999; Ohanian, 1990; Kertz and Ohanian, 1992].”
MethodPerrault, E. K. (2020) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2020.1733230 · Cited by 5
“Trust Provider trust was measured with six semantic differential items adapted from source credibility scales of McCroskey and Teven (1999) and Ohanian (1990). Participants were asked to rate how dishonest/honest, undependable/dependable, unreliable/reliable, insincere/sincere, untrustworthy/ trustworthy, and phony/ge…”
MethodInfluentialThe Ideal Grandparent Scale: Validation in a French Young Adults Population
Duflos, M., Giraudeau, C., Mansson, D. H., Bailly, N., & Ferrand, C. (2020) · Ageing International · doi:10.1007/s12126-020-09386-7 · Cited by 5
“In line with McCroskey and Teven (1999), Mansson defined “caring” as having other’s best intentions at heart by being understanding, empathic, and responsive.”
BackgroundDeveloping Teacher Credibility in Urban Environments: A B.E.A.R . Necessity
Tanase, M. F. (2020) · Journal of Education · doi:10.1177/0022057420969430 · Cited by 5
“McCroskey and Teven (1999) Gili (2013) Riner (2008) Trustworthiness (perceived goodness of the teacher) Values (trustworthiness, honesty of the teacher) Believability (trustworthiness of the teacher) Competence (in subject matter and classroom teaching) Expertise (in subject matter, instruction,…”
BackgroundJones, C. W., & Mitchell, J. S. (2021) · Mediterranean Politics · doi:10.1080/13629395.2021.1996765 · Cited by 5
“…respondents’ assessments of the journalist’s credibility along three dimensions featured in prior research on credibility: expertise, trustworthiness, and conscientiousness (Berlo et al., 1969; Flanagin & Metzger, 2003; Hovland et al., 1953; McCroskey & Teven, 1999; McCroskey & Young, 1981).”
BackgroundConstruct-Validating Humility: Perceptions of a Humble Doctor
Kim, S.-Y., & Parcell, E. S. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.882622 · Cited by 5
Learner-instructor similarity: a social attribution approach to learning
Varela, O. E., Cater, J. J., & Michel, N. J. (2015) · Journal of Management Development · doi:10.1108/jmd-08-2013-0102 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J.
- Affiliations
- West Virginia University (US)
- Northwest Missouri State University (US)
- Venue
- Communication Monographs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-103
- ISSN
- 0363-7751 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-5787
- OpenAlex
- W1992262987
- Cited by
- 1,236
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 100 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 36.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Communication Monographs (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Rhetoric and Communication Studies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Social Sciences › Communication › Interpersonal and Organizational Communication
- Keywords
- goodwill, ethos, source credibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review