The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement
Abstract
As a result of the controversy over the dimensionality of the ethos/source credibility construct and the associated plethora of empirical studies in the 1960s and 1970s, Aristotle's dimension of “goodwill” has been dismissed by many contemporary theorists and researchers. It is argued that this occurred as a result of errors made in the earlier empirical research and that “goodwill” can be measured, contrary to earlier claims, and should be restored to its former status in rhetorical communication theory. Empirical research is reported indicating the existence of the goodwill dimension as part of the structure of the ethos/source credibility construct and a measure of that dimension is provided with evidence for its reliability and validity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The scale originates from a widely cited study by McCroskey and Teven that validated a credibility scale composed of 3 related dimensions—goodwill (caring), competence, and trustworthiness [2].”
From Effects of Mock Facebook Workday Comments on Public Perception of Professional Credibility: A Field Study in Canada (2019) · cites this paper as [2]
Citations
Cites
Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957) · Cited by 9,433
A Second Generation Little Jiffy
Kaiser, H. F. (1970) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291817 · Cited by 4,855
Norman, W. T. (1963) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0040291 · Cited by 2,619
(2017) · doi:10.5040/9798400682018.ch-003 · Cited by 2,248
Lumsdaine, A. A. (1954) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02713272 · Cited by 2,237
An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research
Stacks, D. W. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203887011 · Cited by 1,014
DIMENSIONS FOR EVALUATING THE ACCEPTABILITY OF MESSAGE SOURCES
Berlo, D. K., Lemert, J. B., & Mertz, R. J. (1969) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/267745 · Cited by 831
An Introduction to Rhetorical Communication
McCroskey, J. C. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315663791 · Cited by 746
Self-citationScales for the measurement of ethos
McCroskey, J. C. (1966) · Speech Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637756609375482 · Cited by 648
Self-citationEthos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades
McCroskey, J. C., & Young, T. J. (1981) · Central States Speech Journal · doi:10.1080/10510978109368075 · Cited by 571
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Koehn S.C., 1996, Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association
- Walter O., 1948, The measurement of ethos.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,000
Teacher Power Mediates the Effects of Technology Policies on Teacher Credibility
Finn, A. N., & Ledbetter, A. M. (2012) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.725132 · Cited by 79
“…credibility, defined as ‘‘the attitude toward a source of communication held at a given time by a communicator’’ (McCroskey & Young, 1981, p. 24), is composed of three dimensions: competence (expertise), character (trustworthiness), and caring (McCroskey & Teven, 1999; Teven & McCroskey, 1997).”
BackgroundParasocial Interaction in Social Media Influencer-Based Marketing: An SEM Approach
Bhattacharya, A. (2022) · Journal of Internet Commerce · doi:10.1080/15332861.2022.2049112 · Cited by 112
“Source trustworthiness is considered as one dimension of perceived source credibility (McCroskey and Teven 1999) and refers to the confidence in the influencer by the followers as a result of the display of perceived honesty, integrity, and believability of the influencer (Sokolova and Kefi 2020;…”
BackgroundExploratory Theoretical Tests of the Instructor Humor–Student Learning Link
Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2014) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2014.978793 · Cited by 77
Schrodt, P., Turman, P. D., & Soliz, J. E. (2006) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634520600879196 · Cited by 77
“Student ratings of teacher credibility were measured using McCroskey and Teven’s (1999) ethos/credibility scale.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMediated Social Support for Distress Reduction: AI Chatbots vs. Human
Meng, J., Rheu, M., Zhang, Y., Dai, Y. H., & Peng, W. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3579505 · Cited by 85
Perceived instructor credibility and verbal aggressiveness in the college classroom
Myers, S. A. (2001) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824090109384816 · Cited by 76
Carpenter, D. M., DeVellis, R. F., Hogan, S. L., Fisher, E. B., DeVellis, B. M., & Jordan, J. M. (2011) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.551995 · Cited by 75
“Credibility was measured by two items that were derived from the McCroskey and Teven Credibility Scale (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
MethodZhang, Q., & Sapp, D. A. (2012) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.727008 · Cited by 75
“As scholars have examined ethos in classroom research, they have conceptualized teacher credibility in three dimensions: competence, trustworthiness, and caring (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundInfluentialEffective Persuasion Strategies for Socially Assistive Robots
Winkle, K., Lemaignan, S., Caleb-Solly, P., Leonards, U., Turton, A., & Bremner, P. (2019) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2019.8673313 · Cited by 75
“robot to be very genuine would also find it to have high goodwill as demonstrated in HHI [24].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialAutistic Adults May Be Erroneously Perceived as Deceptive and Lacking Credibility
Lim, A., Young, R. L., & Brewer, N. (2021) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-021-04963-4 · Cited by 93
Irfan, B., Kuoppamäki, S., Hosseini, A., & Skantze, G. (2025) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-025-10190-y · Cited by 92
Predictors of trust in the general science and climate science research of US federal agencies
Myers, T. A., Kotcher, J., Stenhouse, N., Anderson, A. A., Maibach, E. W., Beall, L., & Leiserowitz, A. (2016) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662516636040 · Cited by 74
“Perceived character includes belief that the source is acting in “good will” or has the receiver’s interests at heart (McCroskey and Teven, 1999), and has been labeled “faith” (Renn and Levine, 1991), “caring” (Kasperson et al.”
BackgroundMeira, T. M., Prestes, J., Gasparello, G. G., Antelo, O. M., Pithon, M. M., & Tanaka, O. M. (2021) · Progress in Orthodontics · doi:10.1186/s40510-021-00353-9 · Cited by 74
Pishghadam, R., Derakhshan, A., & Zhaleh, K. (2020) · Polish Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.24425/ppb.2019.131001 · Cited by 82
“And, goodwill represents the students’ perceptions of the teacher’s tendency to be caring of students’ best interests by (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialCan You Trust Your Trust Measure?
Chita-Tegmark, M., Law, T., Rabb, N., & Scheutz, M. J. (2021) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3434073.3444677 · Cited by 73
“For example, [20] uses questionnaires that study service relationships [13], and geographically distributed human teams [43]; [11] uses a questionnaire about good will between people [23]; [31] uses a questionnaire about dyadic human-human interaction [15]; and [5] uses a questionnaire about group trust [1].”
BackgroundExamining First- and Second-Order Factor Structures for News Credibility
Yale, R. N., Jensen, J. D., Carcioppolo, N., Sun, Y., & Liu, M. (2015) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2015.1061652 · Cited by 73
“Traditional credibility measurement research focused on people rather than news (e.g., McCroskey & Teven, 1999) demonstrates that when individuals evaluate the credibility of another person, they are able to consistently differentiate between various dimensions of credibility, including expertise,…”
BackgroundGraham, M., & Tarbell, L. M. (2006) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.20116 · Cited by 73
The Presumptions of Expertise: The Role of Ethos in Risk Analysis
Miller, C. R. (2003) · Configurations · doi:10.1353/con.2004.0022 · Cited by 72
Wang, P., & McCarthy, B. (2020) · Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) · doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2020.04.008 · Cited by 88
“…credibility of the source of a message: trustworthiness (the perception that a person will tell the truth if they know it), expertise/competence (the perception that a person knows the truth) and goodwill/caring (the perception that a person cares about the perceiver) (McCroskey and Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundLew, Z., & Walther, J. B. (2022) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2022.2084111 · Cited by 80
“For the outcome of credibility, the present study utilized a three-dimensional conceptualization by McCroskey and Teven (1999), comprising competence (expertise), trustworthiness (honesty), and goodwill (concern toward others).”
MethodSays Who? An Experiment on Allegations of Corruption and Credibility of Sources
Botero, S., Cornejo, R. C., Gamboa, L., Pavão, N. D. C., & Nickerson, D. W. (2015) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1065912915591607 · Cited by 71
Landrum, A. R., Lull, R. B., Akin, H., Hasell, A., & Jamieson, K. H. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.015 · Cited by 71
Myers, S. A., Goodboy, A. K., & 600, M. O. C. (2014) · Southern Communication Journal · doi:10.1080/1041794x.2013.815266 · Cited by 70
“The Teacher Caring Scale is a six-item, seven-point bipolar scale that asks respondents to indicate their perceptions of their instructor’s level of caring.”
Stephens, K. K., Sørnes, J.-O., Rice, R. E., Browning, L. D., & Sætre, A. S. (2008) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0893318908323149 · Cited by 70
“Past research has shown that source credibility matters in interpersonal persuasion (McCroskey, 1966; McCroskey & Teven, 1999) and Web use and evaluation (Metzger, Flanagin, Eyal, Lemus, & McCann, 2003).”
BackgroundRyu, Y. J., Kim, S., & Kim, S. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10030758 · Cited by 80
“McCroskey and Teven [40] focused on competence, goodwill and trustworthiness.”
BackgroundEdwards, C. C., Edwards, A. P., Qing, Q., & Wahl, S. T. (2007) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634520701236866 · Cited by 78
“The Measure of Source Credibility (McCroskey & Teven, 1999) is an 18-item instrument designed to assess perceptions of an individual’s credibility across the three dimensions of competence (6 items; e.g., ‘‘intelligent/unintelligent’’), character (6 items; e.g., ‘‘trustworthy/untrustworthy’’), and…”
BackgroundMcGloin, R., & Denes, A. (2016) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444816675440 · Cited by 78
“This scale was adopted from McCroskey and Teven (1999) and modified for the context of this study.”
MethodHolmes, W. T. “., & Parker, M. A. (2016) · International Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/2329488416675450 · Cited by 68
“The survey composed of three scales: (a) the Motivating Language Scale (MLS; J. Mayfield et al., 1995), (b) the Behavioral Integrity Scale (Dineen et al., 2006), and (c) the Source Credibility Scale (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPhua, J. (2014) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105314536452 · Cited by 76
“…early theoreticians (e.g. Hovland and Weiss, 1951) identified source credibility under the rubric of trustworthiness, along with expertise, more recent research (e.g. McCroskey and Teven, 1999) added goodwill (or caring) as a third, distinct factor influencing social persuasion and attitude change.”
BackgroundInfluentialMiller, A. N., Katt, J. A., Brown, T., & Sivo, S. A. (2013) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2013.835054 · Cited by 68
“Model 1 portrays the three credibility dimensions (competence, trustworthiness, and goodwill) as separate but parallel dimensions (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundOne AI Does Not Fit All: A Cluster Analysis of the Laypeople’s Perception of AI Roles
Kim, T., Molina, M. D., Rheu, M. (., Zhan, E. S., & Peng, W. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581340 · Cited by 68
“Credibility refers to positive perceptions a recipient has toward a source of information at a particular time [128], specifically in terms of three sub-dimensions trustworthiness, expertise, and goodwill [127].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSinclair, J., & Irani, T. A. (2005) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2005.10639203 · Cited by 68
What do college students want? A prioritization of instructional behaviors and characteristics
Goldman, Z. W., Cranmer, G. A., Sollitto, M., LaBelle, S., & Lancaster, A. L. (2016) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2016.1265135 · Cited by 67
“McCroskey and Teven (1999) noted that instructor credibility is composed of three dimensions: competence, character, and caring.”
BackgroundWrench, J. S., & Booth‐Butterfield, M. (2003) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463370309370169 · Cited by 67
Trees, A. R., Kerssen‐Griep, J., & Hess, J. A. (2009) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634520802613419 · Cited by 69
“A number of studies have established that higher credibility is important to creating more persuasive messages, including instructional messages (McCroskey & Teven, 1999; McCroskey & Young, 1981).”
BackgroundInfluentialMaibach, E. W., Uppalapati, S. S., Orr, M., & Thaker, J. J. (2022) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-031621-114417 · Cited by 77
Primed Authenticity: How Priming Impacts Authenticity Perception of Social Media Influencers
Luoma‐aho, V., Pirttimäki, T., Maity, D., Munnukka, J., & Reinikainen, H. (2019) · International Journal of Strategic Communication · doi:10.1080/1553118x.2019.1617716 · Cited by 66
“The tradition of the concept lies in Aristotle’s ethos, which referred to the intelligence, character, and goodwill of the communicator (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundThe role of disclosure in organized word‐of‐mouth marketing programs
Carl, W. J. (2008) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527260701833839 · Cited by 64
“Consistent with communication‐based measures of source credibility, we delineated credibility into three distinct factors (McCroskey and Teve 1999 ) – trustworthiness (being perceived as genuine and ethical), goodwill (the extent to which a person feels the other has their best interest at heart), and competence (know…”
BackgroundWhat are you assessing when you measure “trust” in scientists with a direct measure?
Besley, J. C., & Tiffany, L. A. (2023) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625231161302 · Cited by 63
“…is equally understood to result from a function of the degree to which the potential trustor believes the scientific source is competent (i.e. high ability), has goodwill toward the audience member (i.e. benevolence), and is trustworthy (i.e. high in integrity) (McCroskey and Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundBehavioral Indicators of Transformational Leadership in the College Classroom
Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2011) · Qualitative Research Reports in Communication · doi:10.1080/17459435.2011.601520 · Cited by 74
“For instance, instructional researchers have already revealed the importance of behaviors such as immediacy, caring, credibility, and relevance in the classroom (e.g., Frymier & Shulman, 1995; McCroskey & Teven, 1999; Richmond, Gorham, & McCroskey; Teven, 2007).”
BackgroundDo You Trust Me, Blindly? Factors Influencing Trust Towards a Robot Recommender System
Herse, S., Vitale, J., Tonkin, M., Ebrahimian, D., Ojha, S., Johnston, B., Judge, W., & Williams, M. (2018) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2018.8525581 · Cited by 62
“measure which assessed users’ impressions of competence, goodwill, and trustworthiness of the agent [31].”
BackgroundTeven, J. J., & Herring, J. E. (2005) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/00036810500230685 · Cited by 61
“Source credibility consists of three primary dimensions: competence, trustworthiness, and goodwill/caring (McCroskey & Teven, 1999; Teven & McCroskey, 1997).”
BackgroundSelf-citationPhua, J., Jin, S. V., & Kim, J. (. (2020) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2019.1590854 · Cited by 81
Beall, L., Myers, T. A., Kotcher, J., Vraga, E. K., & Maibach, E. W. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187511 · Cited by 60
Nazione, S. A., Perrault, E. K., & Keating, D. M. (2019) · Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities · doi:10.1007/s40615-019-00597-6 · Cited by 64
Labrie, N., & Schulz, P. J. (2014) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.909276 · Cited by 59
“To measure the general practitioner’s perceived ethos or credibility, use was made of a bipolar scale developed by McCroskey and Teven (1999).”
MethodDelivering Feedback: Supervisors’ Source Credibility and Communication Competence
Westerman, C. Y. K., Reno, K. M., & Heuett, K. B. (2015) · International Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/2329488415613338 · Cited by 59
Xu, Y., Margolin, D., & Niederdeppe, J. (2020) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2020.1751400 · Cited by 59
“Nevertheless, a few other studies have used simple descriptions of the same source to manipulate the construct – for example, describing a source as honest, sincere, and trustworthy versus devious, calculating, and self-centered to control for trustworthiness (McGinnies & Ward, 1980).”
BackgroundSocial Debunking of Misinformation on WhatsApp: The Case for Strong and In-group Ties
Pasquetto, I. V., Jahani, E., Atreja, S., & Baum, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3512964 · Cited by 75
“However, other researchers have argued for a third dimension, goodwill, which refers to whether a source has the receiver’s best interests at heart [53, 59].”
BackgroundHaigh, M. M., & Brubaker, P. J. (2010) · Corporate Communications An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13563281011085538 · Cited by 60
“Source credibility was measured utilizing McCroskey and Trevens (1999)”
MethodDestination websites' persuasiveness
Loda, M. D., Teichmann, K., & Zins, A. H. (2009) · International Journal of Culture Tourism and Hospitality Research · doi:10.1108/17506180910940351 · Cited by 62
“Overall, theorists generally agree that two dimensions are key to source credibility ( McCroskey and Teven, 1999”
BackgroundKim, H. S., & Sundar, S. S. (2011) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1978942.1979028 · Cited by 60
McArthur, J., & Bostedo-Conway, K. (2012) · International journal on teaching and learning in higher education · Cited by 59
Tweeting Fast Matters, But Only if I Think About It: Information Updates on Social Media
Spence, P. R., Lachlan, K. A., Edwards, A. P., & Edwards, C. C. (2015) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463373.2015.1100644 · Cited by 59
“The page manipulated the recency of the updates on the page (at the point in time the page was being viewed by participants), and participants responded to a measure of cognitive elaboration (Perse, 1990), source credibility (McCroskey & Teven, 1999) and information seeking.”
MethodThe effects of credibility cues on the selection of search engine results
Unkel, J., & Haas, A. (2017) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23820 · Cited by 59
“Conceptualizations of trustworthiness generally include criteria such as fair and unbiased reporting (Gaziano & McGrath, 1986; McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundCole, J. G., & McCroskey, J. C. (2003) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463370309370143 · Cited by 59
Self-citationVendemia, M. A., DeAndrea, D. C., & Brathwaite, K. N. (2021) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2021.03.017 · Cited by 58
Boman, C. D., & Schneider, E. J. (2021) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.102004 · Cited by 36
“Guided by McCroskey and Teven ’ s (1999) credibility scale, after receiving the stimuli participants were asked about their perceived credibility towards The Washington Post and AIM .”
BackgroundMethodMottet, T., Parker‐Raley, J., Beebe, S. A., & Cunningham, C. B. (2007) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634520601164259 · Cited by 62
“Three dimensions comprise instructor credibility: competence, character, and caring (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundBolkan, S., & Holmgren, J. L. (2012) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2012.667135 · Cited by 65
“The competence dimension of credibility was measured using the competence section of the three-factor (competence, trustworthiness, goodwill) scale created by McCroskey and Teven (1999).”
MethodPhua, J., Jin, S. A., & Kim, J. (2020) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-06-2019-0213 · Cited by 58
The role of social influencers for effective public health communication
Gupta, S., Dash, S. B., & Mahajan, R. (2021) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-01-2021-0012 · Cited by 57
Ranking versus reputation: perception and effects of search result credibility
Haas, A., & Unkel, J. (2017) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2017.1381166 · Cited by 56
“…their work, a number of additional dimensions like dynamism, objectivity, and goodwill have been discussed (e.g. Berlo, Lemert, and Mertz 1969; McCroskey and Teven 1999; Whitehead 1968), but expertise and trustworthiness still are the ‘ key dimensions ’ of credibility (Choi and Stvilia 2015,…”
BackgroundAssessing the Predictive Value of Parasocial Relationship Intensity in a Political Context
Cohen, J., & Holbert, R. L. (2018) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650218759446 · Cited by 56
“Building on classic Aristotelian claims, McCroskey and Teven (1999) argue source credibility is a latent construct consisting of three dimensions: credibility, trustworthiness, and goodwill.”
BackgroundInfluentialNarrative persuasion, identification, attitudes, and trustworthiness in crisis communication
Clementson, D. E. (2020) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101889 · Cited by 56
Teven, J. J. (2007) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463370601036036 · Cited by 56
“Credibility is a foundation for successful influence (Hovland, Janis, & Kelley, 1953; Kouzes & Posner, 1993; McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundSelf-citationWheeless, V. E., Witt, P. L., Maresh, M., Bryand, M. C., & Schrodt, P. (2011) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2011.555917 · Cited by 56
“Over the years, nomenclature designating the three dimensions of instructor credibility has evolved from expertise, trust, and character (Hovland, Janis, & Kelley, 1953) to competence, trustworthiness, and caring (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundReif, A., Kneisel, T., Schäfer, M., & Taddicken, M. (2020) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v8i1.2536 · Cited by 56
Applying reciprocity and accommodation theories to supervisor/subordinate communication
McCroskey, J. C., & RICHMOND, V. P. (2000) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909880009365575 · Cited by 56
Self-citationWon, S., Lee, S.-Y., & Bong, M. (2017) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22009 · Cited by 61
“…credibility has been studied extensively in communications and counseling research (e.g., Chaiken & Maheswaran, 1994; Hovland & Weiss, 1951; McCroskey & Teven, 1999; McCroskey & Young, 1981; Pornpitakpan, Psychology in the Schools DOI: 10.1002/pits Author Proof4 Won et al.2004; Tormala,…”
BackgroundInfluentialJin, S. A., & Phua, J. (2015) · Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing · doi:10.1080/10548408.2015.1038419 · Cited by 56
“Trustworthiness dimension of source credibility was measured with six items from McCroskey and Teven (1999) using 7-point semantic differential scales ( α = .974) (e.g. “ dishonest ” (1), “ honest ” (7); “ untrustworthy ” (1), “ trustworthy ” (7)).”
BackgroundMethodSuspicion of online product reviews as fake: Cues and consequences
Harrison‐Walker, L. J., & Jiang, Y. (2023) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113780 · Cited by 62
AI or Human? Evaluating Student Feedback Perceptions in Higher Education
Nazaretsky, T., Mejia-Domenzain, P., Swamy, V., Frej, J., & Käser, T. (2024) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72315-5_20 · Cited by 76
The Grandchildren Received Affection Scale: Examining Affectual Solidarity Factors
Mansson, D. H. (2013) · Southern Communication Journal · doi:10.1080/1041794x.2012.729124 · Cited by 52
Schrodt, P. (2013) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2013.807348 · Cited by 51
“The validity of the ethos/credibility measure is welldocumented (Finn et al., 2009), as is the internal reliability of the scale, with previous alpha coefficients ranging from .84 to .92 for all three dimensions (McCroskey & Teven, 1999; Schrodt, 2003; Schrodt & Finn, 2011).”
BackgroundMethodPromoting Mental Health Help-Seeking Behavior Among First-Year College Students
Pace, K., Silk, K. J., Nazione, S. A., Fournier, L., & Collins‐Eaglin, J. (2016) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1250065 · Cited by 51
“Source credibility was measured using five 7-point semantic differential questions and included questions such as asking whether the source of the message was “inexpert/expert” (McCroskey & Teven, 1999, M = 4.76, SD = 1.11, α = 92).”
MethodInfluentialLedford, C. J. W., Villagran, M. M., Kreps, G. L., Zhao, X., McHorney, C. A., Weathers, M., & Keefe, B. (2010) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.06.033 · Cited by 50
“This combination reflects the physician credibility concept documented in literature, which encompasses three dimensions: character (trust), competence (expertise), and caring [38,39].”
BackgroundInteractivity in a Web Conference Training Context: Effects on Trainers and Trainees
Stephens, K. K., & Mottet, T. P. (2007) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634520701573284 · Cited by 56
“McCroskey and Teven (1999) argued that goodwill consists of three elements: understanding, empathy, and responsiveness.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialThrough the Years: An Examination of Instructor Age and Misbehavior on Perceived Teacher Credibility
Semlak, J. L., & Pearson, J. C. (2008) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824090701831867 · Cited by 50
Yale, R. N. (2013) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12035 · Cited by 49
Porter, H., Wrench, J. S., & Hoskinson, C. (2007) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463370600998517 · Cited by 49
“…and subordinate satisfaction and concluded that the factors most conducive to employee motivation and job satisfaction are: supportive supervisors who exhibit high levels of competence, trustworthiness, and fairness, which is similar to the credibility scheme created by McCroskey and Teven (1999).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialJennings, F. J., & Russell, F. M. (2019) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/0963662519837901 · Cited by 52
Rains, S. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909880701262666 · Cited by 48
“McCroskey’s (1966; McCroskey & Teven, 1999) measure was used to assess communicator credibility.”
MethodKim, T., & Song, H. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2049134 · Cited by 56
“Early definitions of credibility characterize it as a mixture of competence, trustworthiness, and goodwill (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundSong, L., Luo, R., & Zhan, Q. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874522 · Cited by 48
Wrench, J. S., & Punyanunt-Carter, N. M. (2004) · Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1080/01463370409370194 · Cited by 48
Stoll, B., Reig, S., He, L., Kaplan, I. B., Jung, M. F., & Fussell, S. R. (2018) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3171221.3171243 · Cited by 48
“To evaluate whether collocated participants would be perceived differently than remote participants in the critical areas of competence and trust, we chose two scale measures from McCroskey [21].”
MethodQin, H., Zhu, Y., Jiang, Y., Luo, S., & Huang, C. (2024) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102726 · Cited by 55
An anatomy of the credibility of online newspapers
Chung, C. J., Kim, H., & Kim, J. H. (2010) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684521011084564 · Cited by 47
Liao, M., & Mak, A. K. Y. (2019) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.101840 · Cited by 51
The Role of Scientific Source Credibility and Goodwill in Public Skepticism Toward GM Foods
Hunt, K. P., & Wald, D. M. (2020) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2020.1725086 · Cited by 50
“…of scientists’ perceived understanding, integrity, and agreement, “trustworthiness” (honesty, believability), concern (for the public’s best interest), (McCroskey & Teven, 1999), and “goodwill” (bias, motivation) (Teven, 2008; Horton et al., 2016; Pechar et al. 2018; Beall et al., 2018).”
BackgroundInfluentialVested Interest, Disaster Preparedness, and Strategic Campaign Message Design
Adame, B. J., & Miller, C. H. (2014) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.842527 · Cited by 46
“…typically comprised of perceptions of authority, expertise, trustworthiness, and character, among other conceptions, (Kumkale & Albarracin, 2004; McCroskey & Teven, 1999; Teven & McCroskey, 1997), and has also been studied from an organizational perspective (Metzger, Flanagin, Eyal, Lemus, &…”
BackgroundFuller, C. M., Marett, K., & Twitchell, D. P. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication · doi:10.1109/tpc.2011.2172731 · Cited by 46
“trustworthiness dimension scale developed as part of an overall measure of communicator credibility [66].”
BackgroundHeinbach, D., Ziegele, M., & Quiring, O. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444818784472 · Cited by 46
“For the treatment check, participants were asked to evaluate the source credibility of the news outlet (e.g. “the media brand is trustworthy,” 5 items, α = .95, McCroskey and Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundPerceived Instructor Credibility as a Function of Instructor Aggressive Communication
Edwards, C. C., & Myers, S. A. (2007) · Communication Research Reports · doi:10.1080/08824090601128141 · Cited by 46
“After students read the scenario, they completed the Measure of Source Credibility scale (McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundMethodHolmes, W. T. “., & Parker, M. A. (2018) · School Leadership and Management · doi:10.1080/13632434.2018.1430687 · Cited by 45
“Key to the dimension of goodwill is the degree and accuracy of the employee’s perception of the leader’s intent (McCroskey and Teven 1999).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialUnderstanding Work/Life Blending: Credibility Implications for Those Who Date at Work
Horan, S. M., & Chory, R. M. (2011) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.582663 · Cited by 44
“It is likely that, in some may view the assessment of perceived credibility as a limitation, conceptualizations of credibility indicate that it is, inherently, a perception of a source’s credibility (J. C. McCroskey, 2006; J. C. McCroskey & Teven, 1999).”
BackgroundInfluentialInterpersonal impressions of a social robot versus human in the context of performance evaluations
Edwards, C. C., Edwards, A. P., Albrehi, F., & Spence, P. R. (2020) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634523.2020.1802495 · Cited by 44
Manchanda, P., Arora, N., & Sethi, V. (2021) · Journal of Promotion Management · doi:10.1080/10496491.2021.1989542 · Cited by 57
“Prior literature establishes three key antecedents of credibility namely, trustworthiness, expertise and physical attractiveness (Hovland & Weiss, 1951; McCroskey & Teven, 1999; McGinnies & Ward, 1980; Widgery, 1974).”
BackgroundDo Bandwagon Cues Affect Credibility Perceptions? A Meta-Analysis of the Experimental Evidence
Wang, S., Chu, T. H., & Huang, G. (2023) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/00936502221124395 · Cited by 54
“For example, McCroskey and Teven (1999) defined source credibility as encompassing the dimensions of competence, trustworthiness, and goodwill.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- McCroskey, J. C., & Teven, J. J.
- Affiliations
- West Virginia University (US)
- Northwest Missouri State University (US)
- Venue
- Communication Monographs
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 90-103
- ISSN
- 0363-7751 (ISSN-L)
- 1479-5787
- OpenAlex
- W1992262987
- Cited by
- 1,236
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 100 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 90 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 36.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Communication Monographs (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Rhetoric and Communication Studies
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
- Social Sciences › Communication › Interpersonal and Organizational Communication
- Keywords
- goodwill, ethos, source credibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review