Cited by 104

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Companion Animals and Health in Older Populations: A Systematic Review

Hughes, Michael J., Verreynne, Martie-Louise, Harpur, Paul, Pachana, Nancy A.·2020·Clinical Gerontologist

Abstract

Objectives . The aim of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to investigate the effect of companion animals (whether simply as pets or used in more formal intervention approaches) on the physical and mental health of older adults (aged 60+). Methods . The reviewers identified key search terms and conducted a systematic search of the PsycINFO and PubMed databases. The 70 articles reviewed were evaluated through tabular and thematic analysis. Results . In 52 of the studies examined, companion animals positively contributed to the mental and/or physical health of older adults. With respect to mental health, involvement with a companion animal improved participant quality of life and effectively attenuated symptoms of depression, anxiety, cognitive impairment, and the behavioral and psychiatric symptoms of dementia (BPSD). In relation to physical health, marked increases in physical activity and improvements in blood pressure and heart rate variability were the only consistent physical health improvements observed from companion animal interactions. Conclusions . Animal companionship can benefit the mental and physical health of older adults, although more and better controlled research on this topic is required. Clinical implications . Use of companion animals has the potential to be an effective treatment or adjunct therapy to improve the health status and quality of life of older individuals.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/07317115.2019.1650863

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AAT and PRT have been extensively used in the management of dementia due to their significant impact on the lives of people of all ages and socioeconomic backgrounds.

    “Among numerous non-pharmacological treatments available, animal-assisted therapy (AAT) and pet-robotic therapy (PRT) have been extensively used in the management of dementia due to their significant impact on the lives of people of all ages and socioeconomic backgrounds (Hughes et al., 2020; Yu et al., 2022).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.11.055 · DOI
  2. 10.1176/appi.ajgp.9.4.439 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.3928/19404921-20100528-99 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2011.00393.x · DOI
  5. Bono A. V., 2015, Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 63, 32
  6. Booth A., 2016, Systematic approaches to a successful literature review
  7. 10.1080/08927936.2016.1152764 · DOI
  8. 10.1080/13607863.2017.1385723 · DOI
  9. 10.1097/hjh.0000000000001214 · DOI
  10. 10.2752/089279302786992676 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/gerona/57.7.M422 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.archger.2005.06.011 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1093/geront/gnw051 · DOI
  14. 10.2752/175303714X13837396326611 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/019394502320555430 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3182769b34 · DOI
  17. 10.1177/0193945914526647 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/1403494812465031 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/13607863.2014.933310 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.004 · DOI
  21. 10.1177/1533317514545477 · DOI
  22. 10.2752/089279307780216605 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.2752/175303713X13795775536138 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)03412-4 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.10.030 · DOI
  26. Gough D., 2012, An introduction to systematic reviews
  27. 10.3928/02793695-20121003-01 · DOI
  28. 10.7759/cureus.864 · DOI
  29. 10.1177/153331750101600409 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2006.00156.x · DOI
  31. 10.1159/000439129 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03613.x · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2011.12.005 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/07370016.2016.1120587 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2009.00268.x · DOI
  36. 10.1300/J083v44n03_09 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.03.004 · DOI
  38. 10.1177/019394502320555421 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/psyg.12145 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/978-3-319-51149-8 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/bf02982710 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.2752/175303711X12998632257585 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2010.00329.x · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1017/S1041610211000226 · DOI
  45. 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2004.00062.x · DOI
  46. 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00116.x · DOI
  47. 10.7748/nop2014.03.26.3.31.e517 · DOI
  48. 10.1007/s40292-016-0156-1 · DOI
  49. 10.1002/gps.4436 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1202_8 · DOI
  51. 10.1159/000081433 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1177/153331750301800610 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1007/s11205-010-9690-8 · DOI
  54. Ruzic A., 2011, Collegium Antropologicum, 35, 73
  55. 10.1300/J016v30n01_04 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.23750/abm.v88i1-S.6281 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.052 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1111/psyg.12159 · DOI
  59. 10.1123/japa.14.2.154 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00856.x · DOI
  61. 10.1024/1421-0185/a000191 · DOI
  62. 10.2752/175303713X13636846944169 · DOI
  63. 10.1080/17437199.2010.534965 · DOI
  64. 10.1503/cmaj.051351 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2000.tb00167.x · DOI
  66. 10.1080/10705500802365532 · DOI
  67. 10.1097/ede.0b013e3181271398 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hughes, M. J., Verreynne, M.-L., Harpur, P., & Pachana, N. A.
Affiliations
  • School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
  • UQ Business School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
  • TC Beirne School of Law, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Venue
Clinical Gerontologist
Published
2019-08-17
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
365-377
ISSN
  • 0731-7115
  • 1545-2301
Cited by
104
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review