The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Companion Animals and Health in Older Populations: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Objectives . The aim of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to investigate the effect of companion animals (whether simply as pets or used in more formal intervention approaches) on the physical and mental health of older adults (aged 60+). Methods . The reviewers identified key search terms and conducted a systematic search of the PsycINFO and PubMed databases. The 70 articles reviewed were evaluated through tabular and thematic analysis. Results . In 52 of the studies examined, companion animals positively contributed to the mental and/or physical health of older adults. With respect to mental health, involvement with a companion animal improved participant quality of life and effectively attenuated symptoms of depression, anxiety, cognitive impairment, and the behavioral and psychiatric symptoms of dementia (BPSD). In relation to physical health, marked increases in physical activity and improvements in blood pressure and heart rate variability were the only consistent physical health improvements observed from companion animal interactions. Conclusions . Animal companionship can benefit the mental and physical health of older adults, although more and better controlled research on this topic is required. Clinical implications . Use of companion animals has the potential to be an effective treatment or adjunct therapy to improve the health status and quality of life of older individuals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AAT and PRT have been extensively used in the management of dementia due to their significant impact on the lives of people of all ages and socioeconomic backgrounds.
“Among numerous non-pharmacological treatments available, animal-assisted therapy (AAT) and pet-robotic therapy (PRT) have been extensively used in the management of dementia due to their significant impact on the lives of people of all ages and socioeconomic backgrounds (Hughes et al., 2020; Yu et al., 2022).”
From Network meta-analysis of comparative efficacy of animal-assisted therapy vs. pet-robot therapy in the management of dementia (2023) · cites this paper as Hughes et al., 2020
Citations
Cites
The Benefit of Pets and Animal-Assisted Therapy to the Health of Older Individuals
Cherniack, E. P., & Cherniack, A. R. (2014) · Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research · doi:10.1155/2014/623203 · Cited by 159
Olsen, C., Pedersen, I., Bergland, A., Enders-Slegers, M.-J., & Ihlebæk, C. (2016) · Geriatric Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2016.04.002 · Cited by 71
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 67
- 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.11.055 · DOI
- 10.1176/appi.ajgp.9.4.439 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3928/19404921-20100528-99 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2011.00393.x · DOI
- Bono A. V., 2015, Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 63, 32
- Booth A., 2016, Systematic approaches to a successful literature review
- 10.1080/08927936.2016.1152764 · DOI
- 10.1080/13607863.2017.1385723 · DOI
- 10.1097/hjh.0000000000001214 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279302786992676 · DOI
- 10.1093/gerona/57.7.M422 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.archger.2005.06.011 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/geront/gnw051 · DOI
- 10.2752/175303714X13837396326611 · DOI
- 10.1177/019394502320555430 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3182769b34 · DOI
- 10.1177/0193945914526647 · DOI
- 10.1177/1403494812465031 · DOI
- 10.1080/13607863.2014.933310 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.06.004 · DOI
- 10.1177/1533317514545477 · DOI
- 10.2752/089279307780216605 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2752/175303713X13795775536138 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)03412-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.10.030 · DOI
- Gough D., 2012, An introduction to systematic reviews
- 10.3928/02793695-20121003-01 · DOI
- 10.7759/cureus.864 · DOI
- 10.1177/153331750101600409 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2006.00156.x · DOI
- 10.1159/000439129 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03613.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2011.12.005 · DOI
- 10.1080/07370016.2016.1120587 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2009.00268.x · DOI
- 10.1300/J083v44n03_09 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jagp.2013.03.004 · DOI
- 10.1177/019394502320555421 · DOI
- 10.1111/psyg.12145 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-51149-8 · DOI
- 10.1007/bf02982710 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2752/175303711X12998632257585 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2010.00329.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S1041610211000226 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1479-8301.2004.00062.x · DOI
- 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00116.x · DOI
- 10.7748/nop2014.03.26.3.31.e517 · DOI
- 10.1007/s40292-016-0156-1 · DOI
- 10.1002/gps.4436 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1202_8 · DOI
- 10.1159/000081433 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/153331750301800610 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11205-010-9690-8 · DOI
- Ruzic A., 2011, Collegium Antropologicum, 35, 73
- 10.1300/J016v30n01_04 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.23750/abm.v88i1-S.6281 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.archger.2004.04.052 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/psyg.12159 · DOI
- 10.1123/japa.14.2.154 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00856.x · DOI
- 10.1024/1421-0185/a000191 · DOI
- 10.2752/175303713X13636846944169 · DOI
- 10.1080/17437199.2010.534965 · DOI
- 10.1503/cmaj.051351 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2000.tb00167.x · DOI
- 10.1080/10705500802365532 · DOI
- 10.1097/ede.0b013e3181271398 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kogan, L. R., Currin-McCulloch, J., Bussolari, C., Packman, W., & Erdman, P. (2021) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani11072084 · Cited by 79
Villarreal-Zegarra, D., Yllescas-Panta, T., Malaquias-Obregon, S., Dámaso-Román, A., & Mayo-Puchoc, N. (2024) · Complementary Therapies in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2024.103023 · Cited by 29
Du, H., Bo, L., Lai, X., Zhu, H., & Huo, X. (2023) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2023.1095996 · Cited by 10
Not a Silver Bullet for Loneliness: How Attachment and Age Shape Intimacy with AI Companions
Ciriello, R., Gal, U., & Turel, O. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.12476 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Hughes, M. J., Verreynne, M.-L., Harpur, P., & Pachana, N. A.
- Affiliations
- School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- UQ Business School, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- TC Beirne School of Law, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Venue
- Clinical Gerontologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-08-17
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 365-377
- ISSN
- 0731-7115
- 1545-2301
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review