Cited by 222Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

The relationship between non‐acute adolescent cannabis use and cognition

HARVEY, MEGAN A., SELLMAN, JOHN D., PORTER, RICHARD J., FRAMPTON, CHRISTOPHER M.·2007·Drug and Alcohol Review

Abstract

Research indicates that cannabis continues to be a popular illegal drug internationally. Furthermore, adolescent rates of use appear to be significant. Whilst the non-acute effect of cannabis use on adult cognition has been extensively researched, there has been less examination of adolescents. This study aimed to investigate the non-acute relationship between cannabis and cognitive function in a sample of adolescents with a continuum of cannabis use, taking into account additional predictor variables (psychiatric functioning, general functioning, demographics and other drug use). Seventy adolescents were recruited from clinical and community sources as well as through newspaper advertisements. After 12 hours abstinence from cannabis, adolescents completed a two-hour interview covering: demographics; alcohol and drug use history; drug use in the past 28 days; depression; further psychiatric functioning (including ADHD and Conduct Disorder); and cognitive functioning as measured by computerised tasks (CANTAB) and traditional pen and paper tests. Adolescents who were regular cannabis users (more than once a week) had a significantly poorer performance on four measures of cognitive function reflecting attention, spatial working memory and learning. Cannabis use remained an independent predictor of performance on the working memory and strategy measures after additional predictor variables were included in a multivariate regression analysis. The results suggest that aspects of ad…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09595230701247772

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adolescent marijuana exposure results in acute and persistent impaired attentional capabilities.

    “Likewise, adolescent marijuana exposure results in acute (Jacobsen et al. 2004; Harvey et al. 2007) and persistent (Ehrenreich et al. 1999; Meier et al. 2012) impaired attentional capabilities.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HARVEY, M. A., SELLMAN, J. D., PORTER, R. J., & FRAMPTON, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
HARVEY, MEGAN A.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-05
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
309-319
ISSN
  • 0959-5236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3362
OpenAlex
W2084058761
Cited by
222
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canterbury Medical Research Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
adolescent cannabis use, cognitive function, working memory, attention, learning, cannabis use frequency, psychiatric functioning, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder, depression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention, Marijuana Abuse, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, New Zealand, Orientation, Dronabinol, Wechsler Scales, Substance Abuse Detection, Comorbidity, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review