Cited by 36Sport Psychology and PerformanceMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCoaching Methods and Impact

Mindful self-reflection to support sustainable high-performance coaching: A process evaluation of a novel method development in elite sport

Open access
Hägglund, Karin, Kenttä, Göran, Thelwell, Richard, Wagstaff, Christopher R. D.·2022·Journal of Applied Sport Psychology

Abstract

High-performance coaches (HPCs) operate in complex and unpredictable environments wherein sustainable performance and well-being are regularly challenged. The purpose of this study was to develop, through an iterative process of data collection, evaluation and action, a brief SMS-based mindful self-reflection intervention to support sustainable high-performance coaching. We present this work through the form of a process evaluation. After an initial pilot intervention, three subsequent phases of development took place with 18 HPCs from athletics and figure skating. In each phase, HPCs completed a daily or weekly brief mindful self-reflection SMS-intervention for 8 weeks prior to taking part in a focus group interview and 6-month or 12-month follow-up. The results of the process evaluation demonstrate exceptionally high fidelity, reach and perceived value of the intervention for the HPCs. The HPCs also perceived the intervention to influence key mechanisms for a sustainable profession such as greater engagement in their well-being (e.g., self-awareness, helpful perspective on vulnerability and self-compassion). Moreover, lasting behavior changes associated with sustainability were reported at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. This process evaluation reflects a rigorously developed and novel procedure for the delivery of a brief mindful self-reflection intervention and appears easy to use by HPCs in their demanding roles.Lay summary: We present a process evaluation of a mindful self- reflection intervention developed to foster sustainable high-performance coaching. Over four development phases we refine the SMS-based intervention and report exceptionally high fidelity, reach and perceived value among the participants. At 6- and 12-month follow-ups participants reported lasting behavior changes associated with sustainability.IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICEThis brief SMS-based mindful self-reflection intervention facilitated healthy perspectives on vulnerability and help-seeking behavior and prompted behavior change aligned with self-compassion and well-being at 6- and 12-months follow-ups. Hence, the SMS intervention may provide practitioners with a tool for supporting sustainability among high-performance coaches.The process evaluation presented here demonstrated exceptionally high fidelity with the simplicity of the SMS intervention seemingly key to this outcome. Moreover, receiving positive reinforcement throughout the intervention and having opportunities to share their experiences in focus group interviews influenced the participants’ perceived value of mindful self-reflection over time.This user-friendly intervention offers a mechanism for self and shared understanding in sport organizations and may provide insights for a range of stakeholders regarding the value of new ways of working that promote vulnerability, openness, help-seeking and collaboration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10413200.2021.1925782

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seven of the wellbeing studies investigated wellbeing using semi-structured interviews.

    “Seven of these studies investigated wellbeing using semi-structured interviews [10, 13, 24, 83–86].”

    From The Mental Health of Elite-Level Coaches: A Systematic Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [84]

    The Focus group interview section (page unavailable) says the authors used interviews with broad opening, transition, and key questions to explore coaches’ experiences; the Discussion links the findings to self-care and well-being. The paper calls these focus group interviews, not semi-structured interviews, and cannot establish the citing sentence’s count of seven studies. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Elite-level coaches presented with a daily or weekly text message containing a mindful self-reflection experienced greater engagement with their mental wellbeing after the intervention, with lasting behaviours extending up to 12 months.

    “Hägglund and colleagues found similar results when elite-level coaches were presented with a daily or weekly text message containing a mindful self-reflection [84]. Findings revealed that coaches experienced greater engagement with their mental wellbeing after the intervention (e.g. self-awareness, vulnerability and self-compassion), with lasting behaviours extending up to 12 months.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hurworth, R. (1996). Qualitative methodology: Common questions about running focus groups during evaluations. Evaluation News and Comment, 5(1), 48-52.
  2. Raedeke, T. D., & Kentt€ a, G. (2013). Coach burnout. In P. Potrac, W. Gilbert, & J. Dennison (Eds.), The handbook of sports coaching (pp. 424-435). Routledge.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hägglund, K., Kenttä, G., Thelwell, R., & Wagstaff, C. R. D.
Affiliations
  • Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences (SE)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
Corresponding author
Hägglund, Karin
Venue
Journal of Applied Sport Psychology
Published
2021-06-14
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
1125-1148
ISSN
  • 1041-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-1571
OpenAlex
W3162192668
Cited by
36
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 3
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Sport Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Coaching Methods and Impact
Keywords
high-performance coaching, text messaging intervention, coach well-being, self-compassion, vulnerability, help-seeking, self-awareness, behavior change, track and field, figure skating, intervention fidelity, process evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review