Cited by 78Sport Psychology and PerformanceStress and Burnout ResearchPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Examining coaches’ perceptions of how their stress influences the coach–athlete relationship

Open access
Thelwell, Richard C., Wagstaff, Christopher R. D., Chapman, Michael T., Kenttä, Göran·2017·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

This study extends recent coach stress research by evaluating how coaches perceive their stress experiences to affect athletes, and the broader coach-athlete relationship. A total of 12 coaches working across a range of team sports at the elite level took part in semi-structured interviews to investigate the 3 study aims: how they perceive athletes to detect signals of coach stress; how they perceive their stress experiences to affect athletes; and, how effective they perceive themselves to be when experiencing stress. Following content analysis, data suggested that coaches perceived athletes able to detect when they were experiencing stress typically via communication, behavioural, and stylistic cues. Although coaches perceived their stress to have some positive effects on athletes, the overwhelming effects were negative and affected "performance and development", "psychological and emotional", and "behavioural and interaction" factors. Coaches also perceived themselves to be less effective when stressed, and this was reflected in their perceptions of competence, self-awareness, and coaching quality. An impactful finding is that coaches are aware of how a range of stress responses are expressed by themselves, and to how they affect athletes, and their coaching quality. Altogether, findings support the emerging view that coach stress affects their own, and athlete performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2016.1241422

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Preliminary evidence indicates that mental health may contribute positively and negatively towards factors such as productivity and motivation.

    “since preliminary evidence indicates that mental health may contribute positively and negatively towards factors such as productivity and motivation [13, 44–46].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thelwell, R. C., Wagstaff, C. R. D., Chapman, M. T., & Kenttä, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
  • Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences (SE)
Corresponding author
Thelwell, Richard C.
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2016-10-08
Volume
35
Issue
19
Pages
1928-1939
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W2528660595
Cited by
78
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
coach stress, coach-athlete relationship, coaching effectiveness, coaching quality, athletic performance, athlete development, coach self-awareness, coach competencies
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Adult, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Leadership, Male, Middle Aged, Sports, Stress, Psychological, Athletic Performance, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review