Cited by 360Social Robot Interaction and HRIInnovative Human-Technology InteractionAI in Service Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Systematic Review: Trust-Building Factors and Implications for Conversational Agent Design

Open access

Rheu, Minjin, Shin, Ji Youn, Peng, Wei, Huh-Yoo, Jina·2021·International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction

DOI 10.1080/10447318.2020.1807710

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Minjin Rheua*, Ji Youn Shina, Wei Penga & Jina Huh-Yooba Media and Information, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USAb Department of Information Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USAMinjin Rheu is a Ph.D. candidate in the Department of Media and Information at Michigan State University. Her research delves into how specific designs or features of communication technology influences users’ motivational and cognitive processes through which people change or adopt their health and prosocial behaviors.Ji Youn Shin is a Ph.D. student in the Department of Media and Information at Michigan State University. Her research includes human-computer interaction, human-centered design, and health communication. She designs and evaluates technologies for supporting individuals’ health and wellness in various health contexts, including family caregiving and pediatric chronic illnesses.Wei Peng is a Professor in the Department of Media and Information, Michigan State University. Her research focuses on the psychological and social mechanisms of behavior change and their application in the design of interactive media for health and wellness promotion.Jina Huh-Yoo is an Assistant Professor of Human-Computer Interaction at Drexel University's College of Computing & Informatics. Her research areas include human-computer interaction, health informatics, and research ethics of health informatics technologies. She was a PI of NIH and NSF-funded projects in promoting health and wellness through consumer-facing technologies.CONTACT Minjin Rheu rheuminj@msu.edu Media and Information, Michigan State University, 404 Wilson Rd, Room 414, East Lansing, MI 48823, USAABSTRACTOff-the-shelf conversational agents are permeating people’s everyday lives. In these artificial intelligence devices, trust plays a key role in users’ initial adoption and successful utilization. Factors enhancing trust toward conversational agents include appearances, voice features, and communication styles. Synthesizing such work will be useful in designing evidence-based, trustworthy conversational agents appropriate for various contexts. We conducted a systematic review of the experimental studies that investigated the effect of conversational agents’ and users’ characteristics on trust. From a full-text review of 29 articles, we identified five agent design-themes affecting trust toward conversational agents: social intelligence of the agent, voice characteristics and communication style, look of the agent, non-verbal communication, and performance quality. We also found that participants’ demographic, personality, or use context moderate the effect of these themes. We discuss implications for designing trustworthy conversational agents and responsibilities around on stereotypes and social norm building through agent design.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10447318.2020.1807710

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
An integrative model of organizational trust
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258792 · Cited by 10,736
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605
The media equation: how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3702 · Cited by 4,872
On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism
Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.114.4.864 · Cited by 4,069
Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers
Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00153 · Cited by 4,022
The Uncanny Valley [From the Field]
Mori, M., MacDorman, K., & Kageki, N. (2012) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2012.2192811 · Cited by 3,542
Trust in close relationships.
Rempel, J. K., Holmes, J. G., & Zanna, M. P. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95 · Cited by 3,146
Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems
Beyer, H. R., & Holtzblatt, K. (1997) · Cited by 2,748
A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot Interaction
Hancock, P. A., Billings, D. R., Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., de Visser, E. J., & Parasuraman, R. (2011) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720811417254 · Cited by 2,051
Embodied Conversational Agents
(2000) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2697.001.0001 · Cited by 1,829
Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.54.5.853 · Cited by 1,675
Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review
Laranjo, L., Dunn, A. G., Tong, H. L., Kocaballi, A. B., Chen, J., Bashir, R., Surian, D., Gallego, B., Magrabi, F., Lau, A. Y. S., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocy072 · Cited by 1,388
Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships
Bickmore, T. W., & Picard, R. W. (2005) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/1067860.1067867 · Cited by 1,333
Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.853 · Cited by 1,209
"Like Having a Really Bad PA": The Gulf between User Expectation and Experience of Conversational Agents
Luger, E., & Sellen, A. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2858036.2858288 · Cited by 1,176
A Meta-Analysis of Factors Influencing the Development of Trust in Automation: Implications for Understanding Autonomy in Future Systems
Schaefer, K. E., Chen, J. Y. C., Szalma, J. L., & Hancock, P. A. (2016) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720816634228 · Cited by 768
Evaluating Anthropomorphic Product Recommendation Agents: A Social Relationship Perspective to Designing Information Systems
Qiu, L., & Benbasat, I. (2009) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222250405 · Cited by 737
Are Machines Gender Neutral? Gender‐Stereotypic Responses to Computers With Voices
Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Green, N. (1997) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb00275.x · Cited by 670
The Conversational Interface
McTear, M., Callejas, Z., & Griol, D. (2016) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32967-3 · Cited by 594
Credibility and computing technology
Tseng, S., & Fogg, B. J. (1999) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/301353.301402 · Cited by 591
Similarities and differences between human–human and human–automation trust: an integrative review
Madhavan, P., & Wiegmann, D. A. (2007) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220500337708 · Cited by 577
Would You Trust a (Faulty) Robot?: Effects of Error, Task Type and Personality on Human-Robot Cooperation and Trust
Salem, M., Lakatos, G., Amirabdollahian, F., & Dautenhahn, K. (2015) · Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/2696454.2696497 · Cited by 494
Relational agents: a model and implementation of building user trust
Bickmore, T., & Cassell, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/365024.365304 · Cited by 479
Persuasive Robotics: The influence of robot gender on human behavior
Siegel, M., Breazeal, C., & Norton, M. I. (2009) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2009.5354116 · Cited by 413
The power of a nod and a glance: envelope vs. emotional feedback in animated conversational agents
Cassell, J., & Thorisson, K. R. (1999) · Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/088395199117360 · Cited by 383
A fully automated conversational agent for promoting mental well-being: a pilot RCT using mixed methods
Ly, K. H., Ly, A.-M., & Andersson, G. (2017) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2017.10.002 · Cited by 368
"What can i help you with?": infrequent users' experiences of intelligent personal assistants
Cowan, B. R., Pantidi, N., Coyle, D., Morrissey, K., Clarke, P., Al-Shehri, S., Earley, D., & Bandeira, N. (2017) · Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services · doi:10.1145/3098279.3098539 · Cited by 351
Source credibility as a function of communicator physical attractiveness
Patzer, G. L. (1983) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/0148-2963(83)90030-9 · Cited by 348
Machine Heuristic: When We Trust Computers More than Humans with Our Personal Information
Sundar, S. S., & Kim, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300768 · Cited by 347
"Hey Alexa, What's Up?": A Mixed-Methods Studies of In-Home Conversational Agent Usage
Sciuto, A., Saini, A., Forlizzi, J., & Hong, J. I. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3196709.3196772 · Cited by 327
Social Dialongue with Embodied Conversational Agents
Bickmore, T., & Cassell, J. (2005) · Text, Speech and Language Technology · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3933-6_2 · Cited by 324
Source Orientation in Human-Computer Interaction
Sundar, S. S., & Nass, C. (2000) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365000027006001 · Cited by 311
Embodied Conversational Agent-Based Kiosk for Automated Interviewing
Nunamaker, J. F., Derrick, D. C., Elkins, A. C., Burgoon, J. K., & Patton, M. W. (2011) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222280102 · Cited by 280
Persuasive robotic assistant for health self-management of older adults: design and evaluation of social behaviors
Looije, R., Neerincx, M. A., & Cnossen, F. (2010) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.08.007 · Cited by 243
Effects of communication style and culture on ability to accept recommendations from robots
Rau, P. L. P., Li, Y., & Li, D. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.025 · Cited by 221
Trust calibration within a human-robot team: Comparing automatically generated explanations
Wang, N., Pynadath, D. V., & Hill, S. G. (2016) · 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2016.7451741 · Cited by 220
Differences in effect of robot and screen agent recommendations on human decision-making
Shinozawa, K., Naya, F., Yamato, J., & Kogure, K. (2004) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.11.003 · Cited by 199
Whose job is it anyway? A study of human-robot interaction in a collaborative task
Hinds, P., Roberts, T., & Jones, H. (2004) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2_7 · Cited by 173
When a Talking-Face Computer Agent is Half-Human and Half-Humanoid: Human Identity and Consistency Preference
Gong, L., & Nass, C. (2007) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00295.x · Cited by 168
People respond better to robots than computer tablets delivering healthcare instructions
Mann, J. A., MacDonald, B. A., Kuo, I.-H., Li, X., & Broadbent, E. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.10.029 · Cited by 156
The Ripple Effects of Vulnerability
Sebo, S. S., Traeger, M. L., Jung, M. F., & Scassellati, B. M. (2018) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3171221.3171275 · Cited by 145
What Makes a Good Conversation? Challenges in Designing Truly Conversational Agents
Clark, L., Pantidi, N., Cooney, O., Doyle, P. R., Garaialde, D., Edwards, J., Spillane, B., Murad, C., Munteanu, C., Wade, V., et al. (2019) · Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.06525 · Cited by 145
Effects of form and motion on judgments of social robots׳ animacy, likability, trustworthiness and unpleasantness
Castro‐González, Á., Admoni, H., & Scassellati, B. M. (2016) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2016.02.004 · Cited by 142
The Sound of Trust: Voice as a Measurement of Trust During Interactions with Embodied Conversational Agents
Elkins, A. C., & Derrick, D. C. (2013) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-012-9339-x · Cited by 136
Face Value? Exploring the Effects of Embodiment for a Group Facilitation Agent
Shamekhi, A., Liao, Q., Wang, D., Bellamy, R., & Erickson, T. D. (2018) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173965 · Cited by 133
Do Robot Performance and Behavioral Style affect Human Trust?
van den Brule, R., Dotsch, R., Bijlstra, G., Wigboldus, D. H. J., & Haselager, P. (2014) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-014-0231-5 · Cited by 115
How smart are the smart toys?
Druga, S., Williams, R., Park, H. W., & Breazeal, C. (2018) · ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/3202185.3202741 · Cited by 102
Effects of Culture on the Credibility of Robot Speech
Andrist, S., Ziadee, M., Boukaram, H., Mutlu, B., & Sakr, M. F. (2015) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/2696454.2696464 · Cited by 96
Computationally modeling interpersonal trust
Lee, J. J., Knox, W. B., Wormwood, J. B., Breazeal, C., & DeSteno, D. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00893 · Cited by 96
Once a Kind Friend is Now a Thing: Understanding How Conversational Agents at Home are Forgotten
Cho, M., Lee, S.-S., & Lee, K.-P. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference · doi:10.1145/3322276.3322332 · Cited by 90
Trust in artificial voices
Torre, I., Goslin, J., White, L., & Zanatto, D. (2018) · Technology, Mind, and Society Conference (TechMindSociety) · doi:10.1145/3183654.3183691 · Cited by 77
Benefits for Me or Risks for Others: A Cross-Culture Investigation of the Effects of Message Frames and Cultural Appeals
Yu, N., & Shen, F. (2012) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.662147 · Cited by 76
Is Spoken Language All-or-Nothing? Implications for Future Speech-Based Human-Machine Interaction
Moore, R. K. (2016) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-2585-3_22 · Cited by 73
The Eleventh ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human Robot Interaction
Bartneck, C., Nagai, Y., Paiva, A., & Šabanović, S. (2016) · Cited by 73
Persuasiveness and Persuasibility as Related to Intelligence and Extraversion*
Carment, D., Miles, C. G., & Cervin, V. B. (1965) · British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1965.tb00433.x · Cited by 65
Brains or Beauty: How to Engender Trust in User-Agent Interactions
Yuksel, B. F., Collisson, P., & Czerwinski, M. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Internet Technology · doi:10.1145/2998572 · Cited by 63
The MODE Model and Its Implications for Studying the Media
Roskos‐Ewoldsen, D. R., Rhodes, N. D., & Fázio, R. H. (2014) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2014.937440 · Cited by 54
Applications and Innovations in Intelligent Systems VIII
(2001) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0275-5 · Cited by 52
Robot Pressure: The Impact of Robot Eye Gaze and Lifelike Bodily Movements upon Decision-Making and Trust
Stanton, C. J., & Stevens, C. (2014) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-11973-1_34 · Cited by 51
An empirical study on the trustworthiness of life-like interface agents
van Mulken, S., André, E., & Müller, J. M. (1999) · Cited by 49
Priming Anthropomorphism: Can the credibility of humanlike robots be transferred to non-humanlike robots?
Zanatto, D., Patacchiola, M., Goslin, J., & Cangelosi, A. (2016) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2016.7451847 · Cited by 48
It Sounds Like A Woman
Hwang, G., Lee, J., Oh, C. Y., & Lee, J. (2019) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3290607.3312915 · Cited by 47
Human After All
Kraus, J., Nothdurft, F., Höck, P., Scholz, D. D., Minker, W., & Baumann, M. R. K. (2016) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3004323.3004338 · Cited by 45
Can AI become Reliable Source to Support Human Decision Making in a Court Scene?
Hayashi, Y., & Wakabayashi, K. (2017) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/3022198.3026338 · Cited by 42
Empathy for Everyone?
Hosseinpanah, A., Krämer, N. C., & Straßmann, C. (2018) · International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI) · doi:10.1145/3284432.3284442 · Cited by 36
(Over)Trust in Automated Driving
Kundinger, T., Wintersberger, P., & Riener, A. (2019) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/3290607.3312869 · Cited by 35
Virtual agents in e‐commerce: representational characteristics for seniors
Chattaraman, V., Kwon, W., Gilbert, J. E., & Shim, S. I. (2011) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/17505931111191492 · Cited by 34
“Why Aren’t You a Sassy Little Thing”: The Effects of Robot-Enacted Guilt Trips on Credibility and Consensus in a Negotiation
Stoll, B., Edwards, C. C., & Edwards, A. P. (2016) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2016.1215339 · Cited by 32
Social interaction moderates human-robot trust-reliance relationship and improves stress coping
Lohani, M., Stokes, C. K., McCoy, M., Bailey, C. A., & Rivers, S. E. (2016) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri.2016.7451811 · Cited by 32
The right kind of unnatural
Aylett, M. P., Sutton, S. J., & Vazquez-Alvarez, Y. (2019) · ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI) · doi:10.1145/3342775.3342806 · Cited by 31
A need for trust in conversational interface research
Edwards, J., & Sanoubari, E. (2019) · ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI) · doi:10.1145/3342775.3342809 · Cited by 26
Phase Coherence in Conceptual Spaces for Conversational Agents
Vassallo, G., Pilato, G., Augello, A., & Gaglio, S. (2010) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470588222.ch18 · Cited by 24
The effects of information accuracy on user trust and compliance
Fox, J. E. (1996) · CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA) · doi:10.1145/257089.257119 · Cited by 18
Social Interaction Moderates Human-Robot Trust-Reliance Relationship and Improves Stress Coping
Lohani, M., Stokes, C. K., McCoy, M., Bailey, C. A., & Rivers, S. E. (2016) · doi:10.5555/2906831.2906932 · Cited by 18
Interacting with embodied agents that can see
Geven, A., Schrammel, J., & Tscheligi, M. (2006) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/1182475.1182490 · Cited by 17
Personality characteristics related to leadership behavior in two types of small group situational problems.
Borg, W. R., & Tupes, E. C. (1958) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0042350 · Cited by 16
Are specialist robots better than generalist robots?
Sah, Y. J., Yoo, B., & Sundar, S. S. (2011) · doi:10.1145/1957656.1957751 · Cited by 13
Agents for Games and Simulations : Trends in Techniques, Concepts and Design
Dignum, F. P. M., Doesburg, W., Silverman, B. G., & Bradshaw, J. (2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-11198-3 · Cited by 12
The Influence of Social Cues and Controlling Language on Agent's Expertise, Sociability, and Trustworthiness
Ghazali, A. S., Ham, J. R. C., Barakova, E. I., & Markopoulos, P. (2017) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3029798.3038410 · Cited by 11
"It's not my Fault!"
Wijnen, L., Coenen, J., & Grzyb, B. J. (2017) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3029798.3038300 · Cited by 7
I would choose the other card
Weiss, A., Buchner, R., Scherndl, T., & Tscheligi, M. (2009) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/1514095.1514165 · Cited by 3

Research works printed but not linked: 6

Allen T., 2010, Proceedings of AI-2008, the Twenty-Eighth SGAI International Conference on Innovative Techniques and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 16
Clark L., 2019, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings
10.1080/07370024.2004.9667343 · DOI
10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392 · DOI · Paper page
Lee J. J., 2013, Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 893
10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335 · DOI · Paper page

Sorted by citations

Trust in AI and Its Role in the Acceptance of AI Technologies
Choung, H., David, P., & Ross, A. (2023) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2050543 · Cited by 963
“Many recent studies on trust in AI have focused on exploring factors that contribute to trustworthy AI (Gillath et al., 2021; Lockey et al., 2021; Rheu et al., 2021).”
Background
The General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS): Confirmatory Validation and Associations with Personality, Corporate Distrust, and General Trust
Schepman, A., & Rodway, P. (2023) · International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2085400 · Cited by 503
A Systematic Literature Review of User Trust in AI-Enabled Systems: An HCI Perspective
Bach, T. A., Khan, A. N., Hallock, H., Beltrão, G., & Sousa, S. (2022) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2022.2138826 · Cited by 506
Human-Computer Interaction in Customer Service: The Experience with AI Chatbots—A Systematic Literature Review
Nicolescu, L., & Tudorache, M. T. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11101579 · Cited by 280
Emotional expression by artificial intelligence chatbots to improve customer satisfaction: Underlying mechanism and boundary conditions
Zhang, J.-B., Chen, Q., Lu, J.-D., Wang, X., Liu, L.-N., & Feng, Y.-Q. (2023) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2023.104835 · Cited by 223

See all 360

Authors: Rheu, M., Shin, J. Y., Peng, W., & Huh-Yoo, J.
Affiliations: Michigan State University (US)
Department of Information Science, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Corresponding author: Rheu, Minjin
ORCID: Rheu, Minjin
Shin, Ji Youn
Peng, Wei
Venue: International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Published: 2020-09-02
Volume: 37
Issue: 1
Pages: 81-96
ISSN: 1044-7318 (ISSN-L)
1532-7590
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2020.1807710
OpenAlex: W3082818995
Semantic Scholar: 824e392846e1b38787c39d8318d5f1e44e9a6c5b
Cited by: 360
References: 83
Citations by year: 2026: 76 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 1
FWCI: 4.66
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: green
figshare.com
Licence: cc-by
Locations: International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Figshare (cc-by)
Topics: Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › AI in Service Interactions
Keywords: chatbots, trust, agent design, voice characteristics, communication styles, nonverbal communication, agent appearance, social intelligence, performance quality, user personality, demographic moderators, social norms, stereotypes, health communication, human-computer interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Systematic Review: Trust-Building Factors and Implications for Conversational Agent Design

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks