Cited by 157Stress Responses and CortisolCardiac Health and Mental HealthHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Divergent associations of adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies with inflammation

Open access
Appleton, Allison A., Buka, Stephen L., Loucks, Eric B., Gilman, Stephen E., Kubzansky, Laura D.·2013·Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Recent work suggests effective emotion regulation may protect against risk of developing coronary heart disease (CHD), but the mechanisms remain unknown. Strategies for regulating emotions vary in how effectively they mitigate potentially toxic effects of stressful life experiences, and therefore may be differentially associated with CHD risk. In this study, we examined the emotion regulation strategies of reappraisal and suppression in relation to inflammation, a biological state associated with both stress and CHD. We hypothesized that suppression would be associated with elevated inflammation and reappraisal would be associated with lower levels of inflammation. METHODS: We studied adult offspring (n = 379; mean age = 42.2 years) of Collaborative Perinatal Project participants, a national cohort of pregnant women enrolled in 1959-1966. Validated measures of two emotion regulation strategies were examined: reappraisal and suppression. Inflammation was measured as plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. We fit multiple linear regression models predicting CRP while controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, and health factors, including depressive symptoms, measured across the life course. RESULTS: A 1 standard deviation increase in reappraisal was associated with significantly lower CRP (b = -0.18, SE = 0.06, p < .01) controlling for demographics. This relation was somewhat attenuated in life course models, with adulthood body mass index partially explaining the association. A 1 standard deviation increase in suppression was associated with significantly higher CRP (b = 0.21, SE = 0.05, p < .001), and this association was not substantively attenuated with further covariate adjustment. CONCLUSION: Adaptive emotion regulation was associated with lower levels of inflammation and maladaptive emotion regulation was associated with higher levels of inflammation. If these associations are confirmed by prospective and experimental studies, such evidence may provide insight into novel targets for interventions to promote health and reduce cardiovascular risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0030068

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. C Reactive Protein Coronary Heart Disease Genetics Collaboration Association between C reactive protein and coronary heart disease: mendelian randomisation analysis based on individual participant data British Medical Journal 2011 342 d548 1 8 PMC3039696 21325005
  2. Ford DE Erlinger TP Depression and C-reactive protein in US adults: Data from the third national health and nutrition examination survey Archives of Internal Medicine 2004 164 1010 1014 15136311
  3. Steptoe A O’Donnell K Badrick E Kumari M Marmot M Neuroendocrine and inflammatory factors associated with positive affect in men and women: The Whitehall II study American Journal of Epidemiology 2008 167 1 96 102 17916595

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Appleton, A. A., Buka, S. L., Loucks, E. B., Gilman, S. E., & Kubzansky, L. D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2013-07
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
748-756
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2039944747
Cited by
157
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
4.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Aging (AG023397)
  • National Institutes of Health (P50 CA084719)
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • Harvard School of Public Health (T32HL098048)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
emotion regulation, cognitive reappraisal, emotional suppression, inflammation, C-reactive protein, coronary heart disease risk, stress, depressive symptoms, body mass index, life course, Collaborative Perinatal Project, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, C-Reactive Protein, Coronary Disease, Emotions, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review