Cited by 244Memory Processes and InfluencesVisual perception and processing mechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Priming of popout: III. A short-term implicit memory system beneficial for rapid target selection

Maljkovic, Vera, Nakayama, Ken·2000·Visual Cognition

Abstract

The priming of popout (PoP) (Maljkovic & Nakayama, 1994, 1996) increases the speed of attentional deployment to subsequent targets having the same feature characteristic and relative position, it lasts for approximately 5-8 trials, and is cumulative. Here we establish PoP as an example of short-term implicit memory by showing that it is qualitatively different from explicit memory. Using a post-cued recall procedure embedded in the stream of search task trials, we show that explicit memory is not selective as is PoP and is of much shorter duration. As such we argue that explicit memory is unlikely to account for the properties of PoP. In examining the decay of PoP, we find that: PoP is not evident after a 90sec delay, it does not show passive decay over much shorter intervals (1-3sec), and it gets decremented by attentional deployments to visually dissimilar stimuli, the size of the decrement being related to task difficulty. The results, taken together, suggest that PoP reflects a functionally beneficial memory system, specialized for the rapid and automatic selection of items for focal attention and saccadic eye movements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/135062800407202

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intertrial priming occurred for up to eight successive trials, even when participants were unaware of repetitions or were informed that the target was unlikely to be the same between trials.

    “Priming between trials, or intertrial priming, occurred for up to eight successive trials, even when participants were unware of repetitions (Maljkovic & Nakayama, 2000), or when they were informed that the target was unlikely to be same between trials (Maljkovic & Nakayama, 1994).”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Maljkovic & Nakayama, 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Visual Cognition
Published
2000-07
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
571-595
ISSN
  • 1350-6285 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0716
OpenAlex
W2117829467
Cited by
244
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Visual Cognition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
pop-out, attentional deployment, declarative memory, memory decay, visual search, target selection, saccades, feature-based attention, task difficulty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review