Cited by 172Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorWorkaholism, burnout, and well-beingWorkplace Health and Well-being

“Take a break?!” Off-job recovery, job demands, and job resources as predictors of health, active learning, and creativity

de Jonge, Jan, Spoor, Ellen, Sonnentag, Sabine, Dormann, Christian, van den Tooren, Marieke·2012·European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology

Abstract

The aim of this study is to investigate the moderating effect of matching job resources as well as matching off-job recovery (i.e., detachment from work) on the relation between corresponding job demands and psychological outcomes. Using the Demand-Induced Strain Compensation (DISC) Model as a theoretical framework, we conducted a cross-sectional survey study with 399 employees from three Dutch organizations. Results showed that (1) cognitive demands, resources, and lack of detachment are predictors of cognitive outcomes (i.e., active learning and creativity), (2) emotional demands and lack of detachment are predictors of emotional outcomes (i.e., emotional exhaustion), and (3) physical demands, lack of detachment, and lack of resources are predictors of physical outcomes (i.e., physical health complaints). Specifically, cognitive detachment from work might have negative effects on learning and creativity, whereas emotional and physical detachment from work might have positive effects on employees' health, and even on creativity. In conclusion, in order to cope with specific job demands, employees need corresponding job resources and detachment from work to balance health and performance-related outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1359432x.2011.576009

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social and physical nonwork activities affect the acquisition of energy resources required for successful creative processes.

    “Research has shown that social and physical nonwork activities influence the acquisition of energic resources needed for successful engagement in creative processes (de Jonge et al., 2012;Weinberger et al., 2018;Zijlstra and Sonnentag, 2006).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Jonge, J., Spoor, E., Sonnentag, S., Dormann, C., & van den Tooren, M.
Affiliations
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
  • University of Mannheim (DE)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Venue
European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
Published
2012-06
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
321-348
ISSN
  • 1359-432X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0643
OpenAlex
W2132571754
Cited by
172
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 1
FWCI
12.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
detachment from work, job demands, job resources, active learning, creativity, emotional exhaustion, physical health complaints, cognitive demand, emotional demands, physical demands, employee health, employee performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review