Cited by 50Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Effectiveness of computerised cognitive behaviour therapy for anxiety disorders in secondary care

Bell, Caroline J, Colhoun, Helen C, Carter, Frances A, Frampton, Christopher M·2012·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of computerised cognitive behaviour therapy (CCBT) with a wait list control (WLC) for the treatment of patients with an anxiety disorder (social phobia, panic disorder, generalised anxiety disorder) referred to a specialist, publically funded, outpatient anxiety service. Method: Patients with social phobia ( n = 37), panic disorder ( n = 32) or generalised anxiety disorder ( n = 14) were randomised to treatment with either CCBT ( n = 40) or WLC ( n = 43). Self-report rating scale assessments were conducted at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks. Results: Compared with WLC, the CCBT group improved significantly on approximately half of the self-report primary (the Work and Social Adjustment Scale) and approximately half of the secondary measures at both 12 and 24 weeks (the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, the Penn State Worry Questionnaire, the Generalised Anxiety inventory and the Fear Questionnaire). Effect sizes in this study were moderate. Conclusion: This is one of the few studies to investigate CCBT for anxiety disorders in patients in a secondary care service. The results show that CCBT in this secondary care setting has the potential to be beneficial and confirms and extends the findings from previous studies of self-referral or primary care settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0004867412437345

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bell, C. J., Colhoun, H. C., Carter, F. A., & Frampton, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Otago (NZ)
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2012-02-10
Volume
46
Issue
7
Pages
630-640
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2120543065
Cited by
50
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
anxiety disorders, social anxiety disorder, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, secondary care, waitlist control, treatment effectiveness, self-report scale, Work and Social Adjustment Scale, Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale, Penn State Worry Questionnaire, Fear Questionnaire
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Phobic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Waiting Lists, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Panic Disorder, Treatment Outcome, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review