Cited by 53Extracellular vesicles in diseaseTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Extracellular vesicles: pathogenetic, diagnostic and therapeutic value in traumatic brain injury

Open access
Mondello, Stefania, Thelin, Eric P., Shaw, Gerry, Salzet, Michel, Visalli, Carmela, Cizkova, Dasa, Kobeissy, Firas, Buki, Andras·2018·Expert Review of Proteomics

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Accurate classification according to injury-specific and patient-specific characteristics is critical to help informed clinical decision-making and to the pursuit of precision medicine in TBI. Reliable biomarker signatures for improved TBI diagnostics are required but still an unmet need. Areas covered: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) represent a new class of biomarker candidates in TBI. These nano-sized vesicles have key roles in cell signaling profoundly impacting pathogenic pathways, progression and long-term sequelae of TBI. As such EVs might provide novel neurobiological insights, enhance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying TBI pathophysiology and recovery, and serve as biomarker signatures and therapeutic targets and delivery systems. Expert commentary: EVs are fast gaining momentum in TBI research, paving the way for new transformative diagnostic and treatment approaches. Their potential to sort out TBI variability and active involvement in the mechanisms underpinning different clinical phenotypes point out unique opportunities for improved classification, risk-stratification ad intervention, harboring promise of predictive, personalized, and even preemptive therapeutic strategies. Although a great deal of progress has been made, substantial efforts are still required to ensure the needed rigorous validation and reproducibility for clinical implementation of EVs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14789450.2018.1464914

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mondello, S., Thelin, E. P., Shaw, G., Salzet, M., Visalli, C., Cizkova, D., Kobeissy, F., & Buki, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Messina (IT)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • EnCor Biotechnology Inc., Gainesville, FL, USA
  • Université de Lille (FR)
  • Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Department of Neurosurgery, Pecs University, Pecs, Hungary
Corresponding author
Mondello, Stefania
Venue
Expert Review of Proteomics
Published
2018-04-25
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
451-461
ISSN
  • 1478-9450 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8387
OpenAlex
W2801217405
Cited by
53
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Review of Proteomics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
Italian Ministry of Health (GR-2013-02354960)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
extracellular vesicles, traumatic brain injury, biomarkers, risk stratification, TBI pathophysiology, therapeutic target, drug delivery systems, precision medicine, clinical implementation
MeSH terms
Extracellular Vesicles, Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Animals, Body Fluids, Humans, Inflammation, Biomarkers, Exosomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review