Cited by 36Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

History and current status of ICBT

Andersson, Gerhard, Carlbring, Per, Lindefors, Nils·2016·Guided Internet-Based Treatments in Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-06083-5_1

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersson, G., Carlbring, P., & Lindefors, N.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Andersson, Gerhard
Venue
Guided Internet-Based Treatments in Psychiatry
Published
2016
Pages
1-16
OpenAlex
W2234870711
Cited by
36
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
19.42
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, bibliotherapy, therapist role, data security, specific phobia, addiction treatment, cost-effectiveness, implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review