Cited by 522Behavioral Health and InterventionsBehavioral and Psychological StudiesHealth Policy Implementation Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 22 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Theories and techniques of behaviour change: Developing a cumulative science of behaviour change

Open access
Michie, Susan, Johnston, Marie·2012·Health Psychology Review

Abstract

As behaviour contributes to the cause of much current mortality and morbidity (Mokdad, Marks, Stroup, & Gerberding, 2000; Parkin, Boyd, & Walker, 2011), interventions to change behaviour are essent...

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This editorial argues that the science of behaviour change will only accumulate if researchers define behaviour itself as the intervention outcome, describe interventions in terms of replicable behaviour change techniques (BCTs), and connect those techniques to theoretical mechanisms of change. It reviews evidence from companion meta-analyses showing that theory-based interventions outperform merely technique-rich ones.

Key findings

  • The authors identify three priorities: clarifying "behaviour" as the outcome, developing replicable reporting of BCTs, and linking interventions and BCTs to theoretical mechanisms.
  • Behaviour is often mislabelled (e.g., "adherence," "physical activity") or confused with downstream outcomes such as weight or blood glucose; the apparent effectiveness of an intervention depends on which outcome type is chosen.
  • In the cited meta-analyses, the sheer number of BCTs did not predict efficacy, but having an explicit theoretical basis did; Dombrowski et al. found interventions containing more BCTs congruent with Control Theory produced greater weight loss in obese adults, and Taylor et al. found the degree to which worksite physical activity interventions were theory-based predicted effectiveness.
  • Taylor et al.'s meta-analysis also found smaller intervention effects when BCTs were not specified, and Dombrowski et al. identified instruction, self-monitoring and practice as effective techniques.

Methods

  • Design: an editorial/commentary synthesising conceptual arguments and citing findings from the themed issue of *Health Psychology Review* and related literature; no primary data collection.
  • Evidence base: secondary — meta-analyses and meta-regressions by Dombrowski et al. (2012), Taylor et al. (2012), Webb et al. (2010), Michie, Abraham et al. (2009), plus taxonomy-development work on physical activity/healthy eating, smoking, alcohol and condom use.
  • Analysis: narrative argument organised around the three proposed advances; no statistical analysis performed by the authors.

Limitations

  • Not stated in the paper: the editorial does not present a limitations section.
  • Evident from the text: the argument rests entirely on secondary sources and illustrative examples rather than new empirical evidence, so the claims about theory–technique links are programmatic rather than tested.
  • Evident from the text: the authors note that BCT taxonomies have been built inductively and their hierarchical structures have not yet been investigated, and that the mapping of BCTs to theoretical constructs remains a preliminary attempt requiring further work.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17437199.2012.654964

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

16 Not checked yet · 6 Own interpretation · 3 No basis given

Verify all 22 references — free account

Show all 15 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 1
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 9
10 of 10
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The effectiveness of behaviour change interventions varies, and the reasons for this variation are not fully understood.

    “However, their effectiveness is variable, and we do not have a full understanding of what accounts for this variability.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Ineffective techniques are still used, effective techniques are underused, hard to replicate, and their mechanisms are poorly understood.

    “Ineffective techniques continue to be used, while effective techniques are underused, difficult to replicate and their mechanisms of action are poorly understood.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Basic psychological research over the past century has shown that behaviour and behaviour change follow predictable patterns.

    “Basic psychological research over the last century has demonstrated that behaviour and behaviour change follow predictable patterns.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The hierarchical structures of behaviour-specific BCT classifications have not yet been studied.

    “To date, their hierarchical structures have not been investigated.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Abraham C., 2011, Psychology & Health, 26, 299
  2. Hobbs L., 2011, Psychology & Health, 26, 31
  3. Johnston M., 2002, Psychology at the turn of the millennium, Vol. 1: Cognitive, Biological and Health Perspectives, 319
  4. Marteau T.M., 1987, Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 40, 82
  5. Michie S., Encyclopaedia of Behavioral Medicine
  6. Michie S., Addiction

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 522

Metadata

Authors
Michie, S., & Johnston, M.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
Corresponding author
Michie, Susan
Venue
Health Psychology Review
Published
2012-03
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
1-6
ISSN
  • 1743-7199 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-7202
OpenAlex
W1969321932
Cited by
522
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 9
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
behavior change, behaviour change interventions, cumulative science, health behavior, health promotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review