Cited by 121Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionAttachment and Relationship DynamicsMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Enhancing social relationships through positive psychology activities: a randomised controlled trial

Open access
O’Connell, Brenda H., O’Shea, Deirdre, Gallagher, Stephen·2016·The Journal of Positive Psychology

Abstract

Despite the robust relationship between well-being and social relationships, the latter has received little examination within positive psychology activities (PPAs). This study aimed to test whether kindness- and gratitude-based PPAs, through positive social interaction with peers, enhanced relationship satisfaction. Using a longitudinal randomised controlled design, 225 participants were assigned to one of three conditions (relationship-focused, self-focused or control) and completed measures of relationship satisfaction, social support and happiness on three occasions (baseline, post-intervention and six weeks). The experimental PPAs were relationship-focused (involving social interaction) or self-focused (no social interaction). Those who completed relationship-focused PPAs had greater increases in relationship satisfaction than the self-focused and active control activities at six-week follow-up. Additionally, only those in the relationship-focused condition felt their existing friendships had improved at intervention cessation. Regardless of participants’ initial levels of social support, the intervention effects remained. In conclusion, PPAs fostering social kindness and gratitude significantly strengthened relationship satisfaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17439760.2015.1037860

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O’Connell, B. H., O’Shea, D., & Gallagher, S.
Affiliations
University of Limerick (IE)
Corresponding author
O’Connell, Brenda H.
Venue
The Journal of Positive Psychology
Published
2015-05-06
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
149-162
ISSN
  • 1743-9760 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-9779
OpenAlex
W1606894546
Cited by
121
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
28.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Journal of Positive Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick) (acceptedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
relationship satisfaction, kindness, gratitude, interpersonal relationships, social support, happiness, friendship, peer interaction, well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review