Cited by 545Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsAging and Gerontology Research

Happy People Become Happier through Kindness: A Counting Kindnesses Intervention

Open access
Otake, Keiko, Shimai, Satoshi, Tanaka-Matsumi, Junko, Otsui, Kanako, Fredrickson, Barbara L.·2006·Journal of Happiness Studies

Abstract

We examined the relationship between the character strength of kindness and subjective happiness (Study 1), and the effects of a counting kindnesses intervention on subjective happiness (Study 2). In Study 1, participants were 175 Japanese undergraduate students and in Study 2, participants were 119 Japanese women (71 in the intervention group and 48 in the control group). Results showed that: (a) Happy people scored higher on their motivation to perform, and their recognition and enactment of kind behaviors. (b) Happy people have more happy memories in daily life in terms of both quantity and quality. (c) Subjective happiness was increased simply by counting one's own acts of kindness for one week. (d) Happy people became more kind and grateful through the counting kindnesses intervention. Discussion centers on the importance of kindness in producing subjective happiness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10902-005-3650-z

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Baskerville K, Johnson K, Monk-Turner E, Slone Q, Standley H, Stansbury S, Williams M, Young J. Reactions to random acts of kindness. The Social Science Journal. 2000;37:293–298. [Google Scholar]
  2. Buss DM. The evolution of happiness. American Psychologist. 2000;55:5–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Diener E, Larsen RJ. The experience of emotional well-being. In: Lewis M, Haviland JM, editors. Handbook of emotions. Guilford; New York: 1993. pp. 405–415. [Google Scholar]
  4. Diener E, Seligman MEP. Very happy people. Psychological Science. 2002;13:81–84. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  5. Emmons RA, Crumpler CA. Gratitude as human strength: Appraising the evidence. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2000;19:849–857. [Google Scholar]
  6. Fredrickson BL. What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology. 1998;2:300–319. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  7. Fredrickson BL, Branigan CA. Positive emotions broaden scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion. 2005;19:313–332. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  8. Lyubomirsky S. Why are some people happier than others? American Psychologist. 2001;56:239–249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lyubomirsky S, Ross L. Hedonic consequences of social comparison: A contact of happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997;73:1141–1157. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.73.6.1141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  10. Lyubomirsky S, Tucker KL. Implications of individual differences in subjective happiness for perceiving, interpreting, and thinking about life events. Motivation and Emotion. 1998;22:155–186. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lyubomirsky S, Tucker KL, Kasri F. Responses to hedonic conflicting social comparisons: Comparing happy and unhappy people. European Journal of Social Psychology. 2001;31:511–535. [Google Scholar]
  12. McCullough ME, Emmons RA, Tsang J. The grateful disposition: A conceptual and empirical topography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002;82:112–127. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  13. McCullough ME, Tsang J, Emmons RA. Gratitude in intermediate affective terrain: links of grateful moods to individual differences and daily emotional experience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2004;86:295–309. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  14. Park N, Peterson C, Seligman MEP. Strengths of character and well-being. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 2004;23:603–619. [Google Scholar]
  15. Peterson C, Seligman MEP. Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. American Psychological Association; Washington DC: 2004. [Google Scholar]
  16. Seidlitz L, Diener E. Memory for positive versus negative life events: Theories for the differences between happy and unhappy persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1993;64:654–664. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.64.4.654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  17. Seidlitz L, Wyer RS, Diener E. Cognitive correlates of subjective well-being: The processing of valenced life events by happy and unhappy persons. Journal of Research in Personality. 1997;31:240–256. [Google Scholar]
  18. Seligman MEP. Positive psychology: Fundamental assumptions. Psychologist. 2003;16:126–127. [Google Scholar]
  19. Seligman MEP, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist. 2000;55:5–14. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  20. Shimai S, Otake K, Utsuki N, Ikemi A, Lyubomirsky S. Development of Japanese subjective happiness scale, (SHS), and its examination of validity and reliability. Japanese Journal of Public Health. 2004;51:1–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Strack E, Argyle M, Schwarts N. Subjective well-being. Pergamon; Oxford: 1991. [Google Scholar]
  22. Suh E, Diener E, Oishi S, Triandis HC. The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998;74:482–493. [Google Scholar]
  23. Watkins PC. Gratitude and subjective well-being. In: Emmons RA, McCullough ME, editors. The psychology of gratitude. Oxford University Press; New York: 2004. pp. 167–192. [Google Scholar]
  24. Watkins PC, Woodward K, Stone T, Koths RL. Gratitude and happiness: Development of a measure of gratitude, and relationships with subjective well-being. Social Behavior and Personality. 2003;31:431–452. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Otake, K., Shimai, S., Tanaka-Matsumi, J., Otsui, K., & Fredrickson, B. L.
Affiliations
  • Tohoku Gakuin University (JP)
  • Kobe College (JP)
  • Kwansei Gakuin University (JP)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Otake, Keiko
Venue
Journal of Happiness Studies
Published
2006-09
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
361-375
ISSN
  • 1389-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7780
OpenAlex
W2138186842
Cited by
545
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 32
FWCI
12.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Happiness Studies (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH059615)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
kindness, character strengths, subjective happiness, gratitude, positive psychology interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review