Cited by 21Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionBullying, Victimization, and AggressionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Unlike adults, children and adolescents show predominantly increased neural activation to social exclusion by members of the opposite gender

Open access
Bolling, Danielle Z., Pelphrey, Kevin A., Vander Wyk, Brent C.·2016·Social Neuroscience

Abstract

The effects of group membership on brain responses to social exclusion have been investigated in adults, revealing greater anterior cingulate responses to exclusion by members of one's in-group (e.g., same-gender). However, social exclusion is a critical aspect of peer relations in youth and reaches heightened salience during adolescence, a time when social anxiety disorders are also emergent. While the behavioral and neural correlates of social exclusion in adolescence have been extensively explored, the effects of group membership on peer rejection are less clear. The current study used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the differential neural correlates of being excluded by peers of one's same- versus opposite-gender during an online ball-toss game. Participants were a group of typically developing children and adolescents (7-17 years). As predicted, anterior cingulate cortex showed a main effect of social exclusion versus fair play. However, unlike a previous adult study, this region did not show increased activation to same-gender exclusion. Instead, several regions differentiating same- versus opposite-gender exclusion were exclusively more sensitive to exclusion by one's opposite gender. These results are discussed in the context of adolescent socio-emotional development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17470919.2015.1117019

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The period during which participants would press the button was modeled as a regressor, but this may not have fully accounted for preparatory motor responses.

    “We modeled the period during which participants would press the button as a regressor (as in Bolling et al., 2011a; Bolling et al., 2011b; Bolling, Pelphrey, & Wyk, 2016), but this may not have fully accounted for preparatory motor responses.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Elliott CD 2007 Differential Ability Scales, 2nd edition: Introductory and technical handbook San Antonio, TX The Psychological Corporation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bolling, D. Z., Pelphrey, K. A., & Vander Wyk, B. C.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Bolling, Danielle Z.
Venue
Social Neuroscience
Published
2015-12-15
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
475-486
ISSN
  • 1747-0919 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-0927
OpenAlex
W2197129745
Cited by
21
References
52
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH084080)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (T32 NS07224)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
social exclusion, gender differences, children, adolescents, anterior cingulate cortex, peer rejection, group membership, social anxiety, social-emotional development
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Peer Group, Rejection, Psychology, Sex Characteristics, Social Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review