Cited by 234Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Do you like me? Neural correlates of social evaluation and developmental trajectories

Gunther Moor, Bregtje, van Leijenhorst, Linda, Rombouts, Serge A.R.B., Crone, Eveline A., Van der Molen, Maurits W.·2010·Social Neuroscience

Abstract

Social acceptance is of key importance for healthy functioning. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine age-related changes in the neural correlates of social acceptance and rejection processing. Participants from four age groups participated in the study: pre-pubertal children (8-10 years), early adolescents (12-14 years), older adolescents (16-17 years) and young adults (19-25 years). During the experiment, participants were presented with unfamiliar faces of peers and were asked to predict whether they expected to be liked or disliked by the other person, followed by feedback indicating acceptance or rejection. Results showed that activation in the ventral mPFC and striatum to social feedback was context-dependent; there was increased activation when participants had positive expectations about social evaluation, and increased activation following social acceptance feedback. Age-related comparisons revealed a linear increase in activity with age in these brain regions for positive expectations of social evaluation. Similarly, a linear increase with age was found for activation in the striatum, ventral mPFC, OFC, and lateral PFC for rejection feedback. No age-related differences in neural activation were shown for social acceptance feedback. Together, these results provide important insights in the developmental trajectories of brain regions implicated in social and affective behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17470910903526155

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neural responses to positive feedback mature earlier than neural responses to negative feedback.

    “other fMRI evidence for earlier maturation of neural responses to positive than negative feedback”
  • Activation to negative feedback or aversive consequences increases with age in various cognitive control regions.

    “gradual age-related increases in activation to negative feedback/aversive consequences in a variety of cognitive control regions”
  • The ventral striatum shows evidence of modulation based on receiving positive compared to neutral or negative social feedback.

    “The ventral striatum also shows evidence of modulation based on receiving positive (i.e., being told another person likes you) compared to neutral or negative social feedback 42, 43.”
  • Adolescents, like adults, display striatum responses to positive social feedback (i.e., being liked), but adolescents higher in social anxiety display an increased striatum response to positive relative to negative social feedback.

    “Interestingly, other research shows that adolescents, like adults, display striatum responses to positive social feedback 42, 43 (i.e., being liked), but also that adolescents higher in social anxiety display an increased striatum response to positive relative to negative social feedback 42.”
  • Exclusion differs from fair play by defying widely-held baseline expectations of approximate fairness, thereby inducing expectancy violations.

    “exclusion differs from fair play by defying widely-held baseline expectations of approximate fairness (Gunther Moor et al., 2010; Rodman et al., 2017), thereby inducing expectancy violations”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gunther Moor, B., van Leijenhorst, L., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., Crone, E. A., & Van der Molen, M. W.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Venue
Social Neuroscience
Published
2010-10-14
Volume
5
Issue
5-6
Pages
461-482
ISSN
  • 1747-0919 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-0927
OpenAlex
W1964598640
Cited by
231
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
social evaluation, social acceptance, social rejection, neural correlates, developmental trajectories, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, striatum, orbitofrontal cortex, lateral prefrontal cortex, social feedback, peer liking, brain aging, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Child, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Social Behavior, Feedback, Psychological, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review