Cited by 24Social and Intergroup PsychologyNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Examining the effects of emotion regulation on the ERP response to highly negative social stigmas

Open access
Krendl, Anne C., Zucker, Halle R., Kensinger, Elizabeth A.·2017·Social Neuroscience

Abstract

In order to determine if highly negative stigma is a more salient cue than other negative emotional, non-stigmatized cues, participants underwent electroencephalography while passively viewing or actively regulating their emotional response to images of highly negative stigmatized (e.g., homeless individuals, substance abusers) or highly negative non-stigmatized (e.g., a man holding a gun, an injured person) individuals. Event-related potential (ERP) analyses focused on the N2 (associated with detecting novelty), the early positive potential (associated with processing emotion), and a sustained late positive potential (associated with modulating regulatory goals). A salience effect for highly negative stigma was revealed in the early positive potential, with higher magnitude ERP responses to images of highly negative stigmatized as compared to highly negative non-stigmatized individuals 355 ms poststimulus onset. Moreover, the amplitude of this effect was predicted by individual differences in implicit bias. Our results also demonstrated that the late positivity response was not modulated by regulatory goals (passively view versus to reappraise) for images of highly negative stigmatized individuals, but was for images of highly negative, non-stigmatized individuals (replicating previous findings). Our findings suggest that the neural response to highly negative stigma is salient and rigid.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17470919.2016.1166155

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies showed decreased LPP amplitudes after suppression and after reappraisal of negative emotional stimuli.

    “Studies showed decreased LPP amplitudes after suppression (e.g., [35]) and after reappraisal of negative emotional stimuli (e.g., [36,37,38] but see [39,40]).”

    From Effects of differential strategies of emotion regulation (2019) · cites this paper as [39]

  • The present LPP results are in line with results from Krendl et al. and Grecucci, but contrary to the majority of earlier studies which showed a decreased LPP for reappraisal.

    “Our results are in line with results from Krendl et al. [39], or Grecucci [40], but contrary to the majority of earlier studies which showed a decreased LPP for reappraisal [36,37,66].”

    From Effects of differential strategies of emotion regulation (2019) · cites this paper as [39]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Crocker J Major B Steele C 1998 Social stigma 4 2 New York, NY, US McGraw-Hill

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krendl, A. C., Zucker, H. R., & Kensinger, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
  • Boston College (US)
Corresponding author
Krendl, Anne C.
Venue
Social Neuroscience
Published
2016-03-28
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
349-360
ISSN
  • 1747-0919 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-0927
OpenAlex
W2300224410
Cited by
24
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH080833)
  • NRSA training grant (1F32AG034039)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Keywords
emotion regulation, social stigma, negative stigma, salience, late positive potential, N2, implicit bias, cognitive reappraisal, regulatory objectives
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Brain, Electroencephalography, Emotions, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Social Perception, Visual Perception, Young Adult, Executive Function, Emotional Intelligence, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review