Cited by 119Digital Marketing and Social MediaCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyMarketing and Advertising Strategies

The Role of Metaperception on the Effectiveness of Referral Reward Programs

Wirtz, Jochen, Orsingher, Chiara, Chew, Patricia, Tambyah, Siok Kuan·2013·Journal of Service Research

Abstract

It is generally believed that referral reward programs (RRPs) work because recommendations from friends or relatives are perceived as impartial and trustworthy in analogy to what happens with word-of-mouth recommendations. To understand how an incentivized recommendation affects recommendation behavior, we conducted qualitative interviews and two experiments. We show that recommendation behavior is driven by the givers perception (i.e., their metaperception) of how they will be viewed by the receivers. Metaperception, in turn, is affected negatively by the presence of an incentive, and positively affected by the tie strength between the giver and the receiver. Our findings show that RRPs can have a positive, neutral, and negative effect on recommendation behavior depending on the relative strengths of the negative indirect effect of incentive on recommendation behavior via metaperception, and the positive effect of the perceived attractiveness of the incentive on recommendation behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1094670512462138

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wirtz, J., Orsingher, C., Chew, P., & Tambyah, S. K.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Singapore University of Social Sciences (SG)
Corresponding author
Orsingher, Chiara
Venue
Journal of Service Research
Published
2012-11-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
82-98
ISSN
  • 1094-6705 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7379
OpenAlex
W2137607454
Cited by
119
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4
FWCI
16.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Service Research (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
Keywords
referral reward programs, metaperception, recommendation behavior, word of mouth, incentives, tie strength, trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review