The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness
Abstract
In a new test of the process of forgetting, the authors found that subjects, at the time of exposure, discounted material from “untrustworthy” sources. In time, however, the subjects tended to disassociate the content and the source with the result that the original scepticism faded and the “untrustworthy” material was accepted. Lies, in fact, seemed to be remembered better than truths.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Source expertise affects attitude change (Hovland and Weiss 1951; McCracken 1989; Ohanian 1991), level of confidence and positivity (Tormala, Briñol, and Petty 2007), and behavioral changes (Crisci and Kassinove 1973) and leads to higher levels of persuasion (Petty and Wegener 1998).”
From Driving Brand Engagement Through Online Social Influencers: An Empirical Investigation of Sponsored Blogging Campaigns (2019) · cites this paper as Hovland and Weiss 1951
In the citing paper
“Source credibility theory posits that the effectiveness of a persuasive message depends on the perceived credibility of its source (Hovland and Weiss, 1951).”
From Understanding consumer purchase intention in social media influencer marketing: the mediating role of parasocial relationship and trust in the Moroccan context (2026) · cites this paper as Hovland and Weiss, 1951
In the citing paper
“This finding is consistent with source credibility theory (Hovland and Weiss, 1951), which posits that the persuasive power of a source depends not only on its perceived attributes but also on the relational context in which communication occurs.”
From Understanding consumer purchase intention in social media influencer marketing: the mediating role of parasocial relationship and trust in the Moroccan context (2026) · cites this paper as Hovland and Weiss, 1951
In the citing paper
“Our findings show that trust in government is strongly associated with vaccine acceptance and can contribute to public compliance with recommended actions15.”
From A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 1,005
Joshi, A. W. (2009) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.74.1.94 · Cited by 70
Tzoumaka, E., Tsiotsou, R. H., & Siomkos, G. J. (2014) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2014.894931 · Cited by 76
When in Rome? The Effects of Spokesperson Ethnicity on Audience Evaluation of Crisis Communication
Arpan, L. M. (2002) · Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/002194360203900302 · Cited by 71
Initial attitude, source credibility, and involvement as factors in persuasion
McGinnies, E. M. (1973) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(73)90066-8 · Cited by 69
Motivational Aspects of Attitudinal Elements and Their Place in Cognitive Interaction
Feldman, S. (1966) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-2828-0.50008-8 · Cited by 71
Influence of expert testimony regarding eyewitness accuracy on jury decisions.
Hosch, H. M., Beck, E. L., & McIntyre, P. (1980) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1007/bf01040620 · Cited by 71
Processes of Social Influence: The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
CACIOPPO, J. T., PETTY, R. E., & STOLTENBERG, C. D. (1985) · Advances in Cognitive–Behavioral Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-010604-2.50012-4 · Cited by 69
Source Effects on Psychological Reactance to Regulatory Policies: The Role of Trust and Similarity
Song, H., McComas, K. A., & Schuler, K. L. (2018) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547018791293 · Cited by 70
“Jenkins and Dragojevic (2013) and LaVoie, Quick, Riles, and Lambert (2017) also treated source derogation as a dependent variable, resulting from the effects of forceful language or graphic warning labels on cigarette packs, respectively. These studies were primarily interested in source evaluations as a freedom-resto…”
BackgroundWhen and How Implicit First Impressions Can Be Updated
Ferguson, M. J., Mann, T. C., Cone, J., & Shen, X. (2019) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721419835206 · Cited by 76
Hussain, S., Melewar, T. C., Priporas, C., & Foroudi, P. (2020) · Qualitative Market Research An International Journal · doi:10.1108/qmr-12-2017-0175 · Cited by 79
Scoy, L. J. V., Snyder, B. L., Miller, E. L., Toyobo, O., Grewel, A., Ha, G., Gillespie, S., Patel, M. D., Reilly, J., Zgierska, A. E., et al. (2021) · Journal of Communications In Healthcare · doi:10.1080/17538068.2021.1953934 · Cited by 70
Influencer marketing: a scoping review and a look ahead
Fowler, K., & Thomas, V. L. (2023) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2022.2157038 · Cited by 78
“Some focused on the influencer, for example Source Credibility Model (Hovland & Weiss, 1951; Ohanian, 1991) ( n = 9), and others on the relationship between influencers and followers, including Attribution Theory (Oliver, 1993; Weiner, 1985) ( n = 7), Parasocial Interaction Theory (Horton & Wohl,…”
Do consumers still believe what is said in online product reviews? A persuasion knowledge approach
Bambauer-Sachse, S., & Mangold, S. (2013) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.03.004 · Cited by 78
Appiah, O., & Liu, Y.-I. (2009) · Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising · doi:10.1080/10641734.2009.10505255 · Cited by 69
The Role of Media Distrust in Partisan Voting
Ladd, J. M. (2010) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-010-9123-z · Cited by 81
Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information
Bickart, B. A., & Schindler, R. M. (2001) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.1014.abs · Cited by 70
Firestorms: Modeling conflict diffusion and management strategies in online communities
Hauser, F., Hautz, J., Hutter, K., & Füller, J. (2017) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2017.01.002 · Cited by 71
AI credibility and consumer-AI experiences: a conceptual framework
Khan, A. W., & Mishra, A. (2023) · Journal of Service Theory and Practice · doi:10.1108/jstp-03-2023-0108 · Cited by 75
Spörl-Wang, K., Krause, F., & Henkel, S. (2024) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114991 · Cited by 96
Ardèvol‐Abreu, A., Hooker, C. M., & de Zúñiga, H. G. (2017) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/1464884917700447 · Cited by 69
Damaged corporate reputation: Can celebrity Tweets repair it?
Norel, N. D. V., Kommers, P., van Hoof, J. J., & Verhoeven, J. W. M. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.056 · Cited by 71
Ryu, Y. J., Kim, S., & Kim, S. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10030758 · Cited by 80
Baudier, P., de Boissieu, E., & Duchemin, M.-H. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.122255 · Cited by 79
Phua, J. (2014) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105314536452 · Cited by 76
Tan, S., & Tan, K. (2007) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527260600963711 · Cited by 68
The moderating role of consumer personality and source credibility in celebrity endorsements
Roy, S., Jain, V., & Rana, P. (2013) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration · doi:10.1108/17574321311304549 · Cited by 68
“The source credibility theory The source credibility model stated that the efficacy of the message as communicated by an endorser would depend on the endorser’s expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness as perceived by the consumers (Hovland and Wiess, 1951; McGuire, 1969; Ohanian, 1991).”
BackgroundXue, F., & Phelps, J. E. (2004) · International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising · doi:10.1504/ijima.2004.004016 · Cited by 66
Listener judgments of status cues in speech
Harms, L. S. (1961) · Quarterly Journal of Speech · doi:10.1080/00335636109382471 · Cited by 68
Message Framing and Climate Change Communication: A Meta-Analytical Review
Li, N., & Su, L. Y.-F. (2018) · Journal of Applied Communications · doi:10.4148/1051-0834.2189 · Cited by 68
Principle of congruity and reduction of persuasion.
Tannenbaum, P. H., Macauley, J. R., & Norris, E. L. (1966) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0022893 · Cited by 67
On the Effectiveness of Students’ Evaluative Feedback to University Instructors
Rotem, A., & Glasman, N. S. (1979) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543049003497 · Cited by 67
“A major attribute of influential sources of information is credibility in terms of expertise and trustworthiness (Hovland & Weiss, 1951).”
BackgroundAdvances in the Science of Performance Appraisal: Implications for Practice
Latham, G. P., & Mann, S. L. (2006) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470696378.ch7 · Cited by 67
Foundations of Effective Influence Operations. A Framework for Enhancing Army Capabilities
Larson, E. V., Darilek, R. E., Gibran, D., Nichiporuk, B., Richardson, A., Schwartz, L. H., & Thurston, C. Q. (2009) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e596982009-001 · Cited by 67
Public trust: a comprehensive investigation on perceived media credibility in China
Zhang, H., Zhou, S., & Bin, S. (2013) · Asian Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/01292986.2013.856452 · Cited by 66
Information repetition in evaluative judgments: Easy to monitor, hard to control
Unkelbach, C., Fiedler, K., & Freytag, P. (2007) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.12.002 · Cited by 63
The effectiveness of celebrities in conservation marketing
Duthie, E., Veríssimo, D., Keane, A. M., et al. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180027 · Cited by 66
Improving Trust in News: Audience Solutions
Fisher, C., Flew, T., Park, S., et al. (2020) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2020.1787859 · Cited by 66
Rosenberg‐Kima, R. B., Plant, E. A., Doerr, C. E., & Baylor, A. L. (2010) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01040.x · Cited by 67
Meaning transfer in celebrity endorsements: an explanation using metaphors
Roy, S. (2016) · Journal of Marketing Communications · doi:10.1080/13527266.2016.1197294 · Cited by 68
Alternative facts and fake news entering journalistic content production cycle
Himma-Kadakas, M. (2017) · Cosmopolitan Civil Societies An Interdisciplinary Journal · doi:10.5130/ccs.v9i2.5469 · Cited by 68
“This, too, is nothing new: Hovland and Weiss (1951) exemplify how an individual, as time passes, may remember what was communicated, but does not remember who communicated it, and the journalistic source is automatically trusted.”
BackgroundAristotelian rhetoric and Facebook success in Israel’s 2013 election campaign
Samuel-Azran, T., Yarchi, M., & Wolfsfeld, G. (2015) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-11-2014-0279 · Cited by 70
Campbell, M. C., & Warren, C. (2012) · Social Influence · doi:10.1080/15534510.2012.663740 · Cited by 65
Sidanius, J., Levin, S., Liu, J. H.-F., & Pratto, F. (2000) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(200001/02)30:1 · Cited by 267
Competence is power: How digital influencers impact buying decisions in B2B markets
Crisafulli, B., Quamina, L. T., & Singh, J. (2022) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.05.006 · Cited by 94
THE FUTILITY OF UTILITY ANALYSIS REVISITED: WHEN EVEN AN EXPERT FAILS
Whyte, G., & Latham, G. P. (1997) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00705.x · Cited by 64
Morimoto, M., & Ferle, C. L. (2008) · Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising · doi:10.1080/10641734.2008.10505237 · Cited by 64
The roles of spokes-avatars' personalities in brand communication in 3D virtual environments
Jin, S. A., & Sung, Y. (2009) · Journal of Brand Management · doi:10.1057/bm.2009.18 · Cited by 68
Appiah, O. (2003) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4704_4 · Cited by 64
Hearing a statement now and believing the opposite later
Garcia‐Marques, T., Silva, R. R., Reber, R., & Unkelbach, C. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.09.015 · Cited by 60
Climate Change Education Through TV Weathercasts: Results of a Field Experiment
Zhao, X., Maibach, E. W., Gandy, J., Witte, J., Cullen, H. M., Klinger, B. A., Rowan, K. E., Witte, J. C., & Pyle, A. S. (2013) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-12-00144.1 · Cited by 65
Participation and power equalization
Mulder, M., & Wilke, H. (1970) · Organizational Behavior and Human Performance · doi:10.1016/0030-5073(70)90033-4 · Cited by 63
Distance as a determinant of influence in a two-person serial interaction situation.
Fisher, S., & Lubin, A. (1958) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0044609 · Cited by 63
Biasing effects of pretrial publicity on judicial decisions
Sue, S., Smith, R. E., & Gilbert, R. (1974) · Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1016/0047-2352(74)90007-5 · Cited by 62
Trivedi, J., & Sama, R. (2020) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.1903 · Cited by 69
What are you assessing when you measure “trust” in scientists with a direct measure?
Besley, J. C., & Tiffany, L. A. (2023) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625231161302 · Cited by 63
“Credibility researchers similarly sometimes use just two dimensions called expertise and trustworthiness (Hovland and Weiss, 1951).1 Yet another group of researchers use the term perceived “agency” for ability and perceived “communion” for benevolence/integrity (Wojciszke and Abele, 2008).”
BackgroundConsequences of local culinary memorable experience: Evidence from TikTok influencers
Shoukat, M. H., Selem, K. M., Elgammal, I., Ramkissoon, H. R., & Amponsah, M. (2023) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103962 · Cited by 80
Alam, F., Meng, T., Rastogi, R., Mendiratta, A., & Attri, R. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122973 · Cited by 78
Kim, D., & Johnson, T. J. (2009) · International Communication Gazette · doi:10.1177/1748048509102182 · Cited by 62
Tell it like it is: The effects of differing responses to negative online reviews
Jones, C. L. E., Stevens, J. L., Breazeale, M. J., & Spaid, B. I. (2018) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21142 · Cited by 74
The Future of Dataveillance in Advertising Theory and Practice
Strycharz, J., & Segijn, C. M. (2022) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2022.2109781 · Cited by 63
“According to the source credibility hypothesis, perceptions about a message rely on perceptions about its source (Hovland and Weiss 1951).”
BackgroundWhen Self Is the Source: Effects of Media Customization on Message Processing
Kang, H., & Sundar, S. S. (2016) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213269.2015.1121829 · Cited by 62
How Consumers React to Environmental Information: An Experimental Study
Ertz, M., François, J., & Durif, F. (2017) · Journal of International Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1080/08961530.2016.1273813 · Cited by 63
Theory In, Theory Out: The Uses of Social Theory in Machine Learning for Social Science
Radford, J., & Joseph, K. (2020) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2020.00018 · Cited by 58
“These ideas align with theories of source credibility [51] and the importance of influential nodes in information spread [78] that emphasize the centrality of social network structure in information flow.”
Background‘Fool me once, shame on you’: Direct personal experience and media trust
Livio, O., & Cohen, J. (2016) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/1464884916671331 · Cited by 60
Health-Related Communication of Social Media Influencers: A Scoping Review
Kaňková, J., Binder, A., & Matthes, J. (2024) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2024.2397268 · Cited by 88
“This theory, introduced by Hovland and Weiss (1951), postulates that when audience members perceive communicators as credible, they are more likely to be persuaded (Hovland & Weiss, 1951; Hovland et al., 1953).”
Trust models and theories in human–computer interaction: A systematic literature review
Gulati, S., McDonagh, J., Sousa, S., & Lamas, D. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100495 · Cited by 83
Heroes and Villains: Cultural Narratives, Mass Opinions, and Climate Change
Jones, M. D. (2010) · SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University) · Cited by 60
Attitudes and the Digital Divide: Attitude Measurement as Instrument to Predict Internet Usage
Donat, E., Brandtweiner, R., & Kerschbaum, J. (2009) · Informing Science The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline · doi:10.28945/427 · Cited by 60
Demirdöğen, Ü. D. (2010) · Cited by 60
Not just for the recommender: How eWOM incentives influence the recommendation audience
Reimer, T., & Benkenstein, M. (2018) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.041 · Cited by 61
Wang, L., Fan, L., & Bae, S. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.024 · Cited by 59
Credibility of climate change denial in social media
Samantray, A., & Pin, P. (2019) · Palgrave Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0344-4 · Cited by 60
How the type of sports-related endorser influences consumers' purchase intentions
von Felbert, A., & Breuer, C. (2020) · International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship · doi:10.1108/ijsms-01-2020-0009 · Cited by 70
Jackson, D. J. (2008) · Journal of Political Marketing · doi:10.1300/j199v06n04_04 · Cited by 60
2 Suspiciousness of Experimenter's Intent
McGuire, W. J. (2009) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195385540.003.0002 · Cited by 59
Keshavarz, H. (2020) · Information Discovery and Delivery · doi:10.1108/idd-03-2020-0033 · Cited by 81
Luo, X., Cheah, J., Lim, X., Ramayah, T., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2024) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-04-2023-0260 · Cited by 74
Haigh, M. M., & Brubaker, P. J. (2010) · Corporate Communications An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13563281011085538 · Cited by 60
Shumate, M., & O’Connor, A. (2010) · Communication Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637751003758201 · Cited by 59
Do nurses’ personal health behaviours impact on their health promotion practice? A systematic review
Kelly, M., Wills, J., & Sykes, S. (2017) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.08.008 · Cited by 59
Determinants of Mobile Wallet Intentions to Use: The Mental Cost Perspective
Chatterjee, D., & Bolar, K. P. (2018) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2018.1505697 · Cited by 67
“The concept of Trust can be derived from the two theories namely source credibility theory developed by Hovland and Weiss (1951) and Social exchange theory by Blau (1964).”
Not just numbers: The role of social media metrics in online news evaluations
Chung, M. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.022 · Cited by 64
The Suggestibility of Children’s Memory: A Social-Psychological and Cognitive Interpretation
Toglia, M. P., Ross, D. F., Ceci, S. J., & Hembrooke, H. A. (1992) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2868-4_7 · Cited by 59
Reply-Aided Detection of Misinformation via Bayesian Deep Learning
Zhang, Q., Lipani, A., Liang, S., & Yılmaz, E. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313718 · Cited by 60
“As misinformation is usually published by unbelievable individuals or automatic bots, credibility plays a crucial role in message communication [18, 32].”
BackgroundSource Credibility Theory: SME Hospitality Sector Blog Posting During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Serman, Z., & Sims, J. M. (2022) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-022-10349-3 · Cited by 86
No, Virginia, it’s not true what they say about publicity’s “implied third-party endorsement” effect
Hallahan, K. (1999) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/s0363-8111(99)00022-3 · Cited by 58
Groenendyk, E. W., & Valentino, N. A. (2002) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650202029003004 · Cited by 58
The Delay Hypothesis: The Manifestation of Media Effects Over Time
Jensen, J. D., Bernat, J. K., Wilson, K. M., & Goonewardene, J. (2011) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01415.x · Cited by 57
“…whether the sleeper effect is caused by message recipients forgetting the source, disassociating the source and the message content, or differential rates of source and message decay (Hovland, Lumsdaine, & Sheffield, 1949; Hovland & Weiss, 1951; Pratkanis, Greenwald, Leippe, & Baumgardner, 1988).”
BackgroundInfluentialWhy Isn't Everyone Doing It? A Comparison of Antecedents to Following Brands on Twitter and Facebook
Logan, K. (2014) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2014.935536 · Cited by 57
How Long Do News Framing Effects Last? A Systematic review of Longitudinal Studies
Lecheler, S. K., & de Vreese, C. H. (2016) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2015.11735254 · Cited by 64
Ranking versus reputation: perception and effects of search result credibility
Haas, A., & Unkel, J. (2017) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2017.1381166 · Cited by 56
Bentele, G. (1988) · Publizistik · doi:10.1007/bf03653626 · Cited by 58
Wiest, W. M. (1965) · The Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0093890 · Cited by 58
Dalla-Pria, L., & Rodríguez‐de‐Dios, I. (2022) · Corporate Communications An International Journal · doi:10.1108/ccij-09-2021-0097 · Cited by 67
Lan, D. H., & Tung, T. M. (2024) · Cogent Social Sciences · doi:10.1080/23311886.2024.2302216 · Cited by 55
“More importantly, this study shows that the frequency of using social media may not equal a high level of trust. this is aligned with several studies revealing the relationship between trust and use is far more complex (newman et al., 2021; Swart & Broersma, 2022) as young individuals might not trust news/ information…”
Jayasingh, S., Arunkumar, S., & Vanathaiyan, A. A. (2025) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.3390/jtaer20010017 · Cited by 122
“…which were applied to study the AI influencers’ effectiveness are Uncanny Valley Theory and Anthropomorphism Theory [31,32], the Ad-vertising Value Model [33], the Source Credibility Theory [34], the Uses and Gratifications Theory (UGT) [35], and the Computer as Social Actors Paradigm (CASA) [36].”
InfluentialGlaser, T., Dickel, N., Liersch, B., Rees, J. H., Süssenbach, P., & Bohner, G. (2014) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868314546489 · Cited by 55
People with Easier to Pronounce Names Promote Truthiness of Claims
Newman, E. J., Sanson, M., Miller, E. K., Quigley‐McBride, A., Foster, J. L., Bernstein, D. M., & Garry, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088671 · Cited by 66
Convergence of crisis response strategy and source credibility: Who can you trust?
Verčić, A. T., Verčič, D., & Coombs, W. T. (2018) · Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management · doi:10.1111/1468-5973.12229 · Cited by 57
Influencing factors of the persuasiveness of online reviews considering persuasion methods
Hong, W., Yu, Z., Wu, L., & Pu, X. (2019) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2019.100912 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Public Opinion Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1951
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 635
- ISSN
- 0033-362X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120061261
- Cited by
- 3,543
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 302 · 2025: 216 · 2024: 217 · 2023: 209 · 2022: 201 · 2021: 181 · 2020: 203 · 2019: 145 · 2018: 129 · 2017: 137 · 2016: 115 · 2015: 128 · 2014: 128 · 2013: 115 · 2012: 110
- FWCI
- 25.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Public Opinion Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Keywords
- source credibility, communication effectiveness, forgetting, memory retention, trustworthiness, skepticism, persuasion, misinformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review