The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness
Abstract
In a new test of the process of forgetting, the authors found that subjects, at the time of exposure, discounted material from “untrustworthy” sources. In time, however, the subjects tended to disassociate the content and the source with the result that the original scepticism faded and the “untrustworthy” material was accepted. Lies, in fact, seemed to be remembered better than truths.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Source expertise affects attitude change (Hovland and Weiss 1951; McCracken 1989; Ohanian 1991), level of confidence and positivity (Tormala, Briñol, and Petty 2007), and behavioral changes (Crisci and Kassinove 1973) and leads to higher levels of persuasion (Petty and Wegener 1998).”
From Driving Brand Engagement Through Online Social Influencers: An Empirical Investigation of Sponsored Blogging Campaigns (2019) · cites this paper as Hovland and Weiss 1951
In the citing paper
“Source credibility theory posits that the effectiveness of a persuasive message depends on the perceived credibility of its source (Hovland and Weiss, 1951).”
From Understanding consumer purchase intention in social media influencer marketing: the mediating role of parasocial relationship and trust in the Moroccan context (2026) · cites this paper as Hovland and Weiss, 1951
In the citing paper
“This finding is consistent with source credibility theory (Hovland and Weiss, 1951), which posits that the persuasive power of a source depends not only on its perceived attributes but also on the relational context in which communication occurs.”
From Understanding consumer purchase intention in social media influencer marketing: the mediating role of parasocial relationship and trust in the Moroccan context (2026) · cites this paper as Hovland and Weiss, 1951
In the citing paper
“Our findings show that trust in government is strongly associated with vaccine acceptance and can contribute to public compliance with recommended actions15.”
From A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,005
Enhancing Brand Credibility Via Celebrity Endorsement
Wang, S. W., & Scheinbaum, A. C. (2017) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/jar-2017-042 · Cited by 458
Brief, A. P., Dietz, J., Cohen, R. R., Pugh, S. D., & Vaslow, J. B. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2867 · Cited by 352
From digital media influencers to celebrity endorsers: attributions drive endorser effectiveness
Kapitan, S., & Silvera, D. H. (2015) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-015-9363-0 · Cited by 436
Individual and Contextual Correlates of Trust in Media Across 44 Countries
Tsfati, Y., & Ariely, G. (2013) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650213485972 · Cited by 357
Organizational Problem Formulation: An Empirical Study
Lyles, M. A., & Mitroff, I. I. (1980) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392229 · Cited by 344
Aesthetics and credibility in web site design
Robins, D. B., & Holmes, J. (2007) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2007.02.003 · Cited by 389
“Foundations of credibility theory and related literature Hovland and Weiss (1951) were the first to produce empirical evidence that the believability of a message is strongly influenced by its source.”
BackgroundCelebrities in Advertising: Looking for Congruence or Likability?
Fleck, N., Korchia, M., & Roy, I. L. (2012) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20551 · Cited by 358
Predictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance, Intention, and Hesitancy: A Scoping Review
Joshi, A., Kaur, M., Kaur, R., Grover, A., Nash, D., & El-Mohandes, A. A. E. (2021) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2021.698111 · Cited by 349
“Trust in government is highly associated with vaccine acceptance and can contribute to public compliance with recommended actions (12).”
BackgroundAttribution versus persuasion as a means for modifying behavior.
Miller, R. L., Brickman, P., & Bolen, D. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076539 · Cited by 348
Source credibility as a function of communicator physical attractiveness
Patzer, G. L. (1983) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/0148-2963(83)90030-9 · Cited by 348
The sleeper effect in persuasion: a meta-analytic review.
Kumkale, G. T., & Albarracín, D. (2004) · Psychological bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.143 · Cited by 343
Narrative Review: The Promotion of Gabapentin: An Analysis of Internal Industry Documents
Steinman, M. A., Bero, L. A., Chren, M., & Landefeld, C. S. (2006) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00008 · Cited by 341
Sokolova, K., & Pérez, C. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102276 · Cited by 430
Credibility: A multidisciplinary framework
Rieh, S. Y., & Danielson, D. R. (2007) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.2007.1440410114 · Cited by 336
Using theories of behaviour change to inform interventions for addictive behaviours
Webb, T. L., Sniehotta, F. F., & Michie, S. (2010) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03028.x · Cited by 359
Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, M., & Ibáñez‐Sánchez, S. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102585 · Cited by 419
Examining the antecedents of persuasive eWOM messages in social media
Teng, S., Khong, K. W., Goh, W. W., & Chong, A. Y. (2014) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-04-2014-0089 · Cited by 360
Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: A conceptual framework
Tandoc, E. C., Ling, R., Westlund, O., Duffy, A., Goh, D., & Wei, L.-Z. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817731756 · Cited by 319
TELEVISION AND WEB ADVERTISING SYNERGIES
Chang, Y., & Thorson, E. (2004) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2004.10639161 · Cited by 306
Source Credibility and Attitude Certainty: A Metacognitive Analysis of Resistance to Persuasion
Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. (2004) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_11 · Cited by 313
Meenaghan, J. A. (1983) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/eum0000000004825 · Cited by 304
Ten considerations for effectively managing the COVID-19 transition
Habersaat, K. B., Betsch, C., Danchin, M. H., Sunstein, C. R., BOHM, R. M., Falk, A., Brewer, N. T., Omer, S. B., Scherzer, M., Sah, S., et al. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0906-x · Cited by 315
Opinion leadership vs. para-social relationship: Key factors in influencer marketing
Farivar, S., Wang, F., & Yuan, Y. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102371 · Cited by 358
Druckman, J. N., & Lupia, A. (2000) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.1 · Cited by 308
Bowman, N. A., & Bastedo, M. N. (2009) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-009-9129-8 · Cited by 320
“As a result, sources that are considered highly untrustworthy can contribute to attitude change, since people do not remember where they initially learned this information (e.g., Hovland and Weiss 1951).”
BackgroundCao, D., Meadows, M., Wong, D. L., & Xia, S. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.025 · Cited by 384
“Hovland and Weiss (1951) found that people tend to discount information from untrustworthy sources; the disassociation of content from its untrustworthy source is likely to result in higher acceptance of untrustworthy information.”
What to Say When: Advertising Appeals in Evolving Markets
Chandy, R. K., Tellis, G. J., MacInnis, D. J., & Thaivanich, P. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.4.399.18908 · Cited by 322
Lee, J., Park, D., & Han, I. (2011) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662241111123766 · Cited by 317
Trivedi, J., & Sama, R. (2019) · Journal of Internet Commerce · doi:10.1080/15332861.2019.1700741 · Cited by 365
“Multiple studies conducted using both these models submit that perceived source credibility and attractiveness influences consumer behavior (Hovland and Weiss 1951; McGuire 1985; Meenaghan 1994; Rashid, Nallamuthu, and Sidin 2002).”
BackgroundReality monitoring: An experimental phenomenological approach.
Johnson, M. K. (1988) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.117.4.390 · Cited by 287
Attitudes in social context: A social identity perspective
Hogg, M. A., & Smith, J. R. (2007) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280701592070 · Cited by 286
Heesacker, M., Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1983) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1983.tb00872.x · Cited by 284
Media effect in commercial sponsorship
Meenaghan, T., & Shipley, D. D. (1999) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090569910253170 · Cited by 284
“…in brand image creation, viz. source effect is not further discussed, although all three concepts are broadly similar in terms of process and indeed may occasionally overlap in terms of relevant attributes (Hovland and Weiss, 1951; Hovland et al., 1953; Kelman, 1961; Percy and Rossiter, 1980).”
BackgroundBenlian, A., Titah, R., & Heß, T. (2012) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222290107 · Cited by 287
“Hovland and Weiss [47] for example showed that the communicator’s”
BackgroundFacebook versus television: advertising value perceptions among females
Logan, K., Bright, L. F., & Gangadharbatla, H. (2012) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/17505931211274651 · Cited by 295
Chu, S.-C., & Kamal, S. (2008) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2008.10722140 · Cited by 284
“Expertise and trustworthiness are the two most common dimensions of source credibility (Hovland, Janis, and Kelley 1953; Hovland and Weiss 1951; McCracken 1989; Ohanian 1991).”
BackgroundHaley, E. (1996) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1996.10673497 · Cited by 282
When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion
Tormala, Z. L., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.10.005 · Cited by 278
“Depending on message recipients’ extent of thinking, source credibility has been found to operate as a peripheral cue or heuristic (e.g., Hovland & Weiss, 1951; Kiesler & Mathog, 1968; Petty, Cacioppo, & Goldman, 1981), to bias thoughts (Chaiken & Maheswaran, 1994), to serve as a piece of evidence…”
BackgroundWölker, A., & Powell, T. E. (2018) · Journalism · doi:10.1177/1464884918757072 · Cited by 337
Chopra, A., Avhad, V., & Jaju, A. S. (2020) · Business Perspectives and Research · doi:10.1177/2278533720923486 · Cited by 330
“The effectiveness of endorsement is often studied by measuring the source credibility (Hovland & Weiss, 1951; Taghipoorreyneh & de Run, 2016).”
Hornsey, M. J., & Imani, A. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167203261295 · Cited by 276
Thinking backward: Some curable and incurable consequences of cognitive busyness.
Gilbert, D. T., & Osborne, R. E. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.940 · Cited by 336
“Furthermore, when source information is explicitly encoded. it is often dissociated from the belief and forgotten ( Cruder et al., 1978 ; Hovland & Weiss, 1951 ; Jacoby, Kelley, Brown, & Jasechko, 1989 ).”
BackgroundA dynamic model of top management team effectiveness: managing unstructured task streams
Edmondson, A. C., Roberto, M. A., & Watkins, M. D. (2003) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(03)00021-3 · Cited by 279
“Another tradition stems from the psychology of social influence processes (e.g., Asch, 1951; Baron, Vandello, & Brunsman, 1996; Hovland & Weiss, 1951; Janis & Mann, 1977; Zimbardo & Leippe, 1991) and employs a socio-emotional lens.”
BackgroundCognitive Theories of Persuasion
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1984) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60122-7 · Cited by 268
Feick, L. F., & Higie, R. A. (1992) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1992.10673364 · Cited by 269
GUNTHER, A. (1991) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365091018003004 · Cited by 267
The Effect of Salesman Similarity and Expertise on Consumer Purchasing Behavior
Woodside, A. G., & Davenport, J. W. (1974) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377401100212 · Cited by 257
Determinants of behaviour and their efficacy as targets of behavioural change interventions
Albarracín, D., Farkhad, B. F., & Samayoa, J. A. G. (2024) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-024-00305-0 · Cited by 313
“For instance, the trustworthiness of an individual delivering a message has been found to influence its persuasiveness 168–174 .”
Whose online reviews to trust? Understanding reviewer trustworthiness and its impact on business
Banerjee, S., Bhattacharyya, S., & Bose, I. (2017) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2017.01.006 · Cited by 253
Stafford, M. R., Stafford, T. F., & Day, E. (2002) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2002.10673664 · Cited by 247
Schimmelpfennig, C., & Hunt, J. B. (2019) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21315 · Cited by 258
On increasing the persuasiveness of a low prestige communicator
Walster, E., Aronson, E., & Abrahams, D. (1966) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(66)90026-6 · Cited by 242
Partisan Media Exposure and Attitudes Toward the Opposition
Levendusky, M. (2013) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.737435 · Cited by 236
“Outlet credibility is a necessary precondition for persuasion (Hovland & Weiss, 1951), so a credible source should be able to persuade listeners to change their evaluations of their own party.”
BackgroundPoston, R. S., & Speier, C. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148678 · Cited by 236
Tien, D. H., Rivas, A. A. A., & Liao, Y. (2018) · Asia Pacific Management Review · doi:10.1016/j.apmrv.2018.06.003 · Cited by 336
“In any communication, changes in the receivers' attitude can often be directly attributed to the sincerity of communicator (Hovland & Weiss, 1951).”
BackgroundDissonance, hypocrisy, and the self-concept.
Aronson, E. (2004) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10318-005 · Cited by 245
How the Media Shape Perceptions of Right-Wing Populist Leaders
Bos, L., van der Brug, W., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2011.564605 · Cited by 247
“To be authoritative in this interpretation is thus highly related to being persuasive: To what extent can the party leader convince voters that he or she has a strong case (i.e., is credible; Hovland & Weiss, 1951)?”
BackgroundWang, S. W., Kao, G. H.-Y., & Ngamsiriudom, W. (2016) · Journal of Air Transport Management · doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2016.12.007 · Cited by 227
Celebrity Endorsements and Beyond: New Avenues for Celebrity Branding
Keel, A. L., & Nataraajan, R. (2012) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20555 · Cited by 254
Weaver, K. D., Garcia, S. M., Schwarz, N., & Miller, D. T. (2007) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.5.821 · Cited by 235
An Ecosystem-Level Process Model of Business Model Disruption: The Disruptor's Gambit
Snihur, Y., Thomas, L. D. W., & Burgelman, R. A. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12343 · Cited by 232
An Introduction to the Theory and Measurement of Influence
March, J. G. (1955) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1951813 · Cited by 222
Effects of communication style and culture on ability to accept recommendations from robots
Rau, P. L. P., Li, Y., & Li, D. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.025 · Cited by 221
The Causal Sequence of Risk Communication in the Parkfield Earthquake Prediction Experiment
Mileti, D. S., & Fitzpatrick, C. D. (1992) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb00691.x · Cited by 222
A summary of experimental research in ethos
Andersen, K. E., & Clevenger, T. (1963) · Speech Monographs · doi:10.1080/03637756309375361 · Cited by 221
Lowry, P. B., Wilson, D. W., & Haig, B. (2013) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2013.839899 · Cited by 250
Says Who?: Epistemic Authority Effects in Social Judgment
Kruglanski, A. W., Raviv, A., Bar‐Tal, D., Raviv, A., Sharvit, K., Ellis, S., Bar, R., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2005) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(05)37006-7 · Cited by 221
Health Information Seeking, Receipt, and Use in Diabetes Self-Management
Longo, D. R., Schubert, S., Wright, B. A., LeMaster, J., Williams, C. D., & Clore, J. N. (2010) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.1115 · Cited by 220
Human or virtual: How influencer type shapes brand attitudes
Ozdemir, O., Kolfal, B., Messinger, P. R., & Rizvi, S. A. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107771 · Cited by 239
Correcting erroneous inferences in memory: The role of source credibility.
Guillory, J. J., & Geraci, L. D. (2013) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2013.10.001 · Cited by 211
“Previous research shows that highly credible sources are more influential than sources with low credibility (Hovland & Weiss, 1951; Johnson & Izzett, 1969; Kelman & Hovland, 1953; Maddux & Rogers, 1980).”
BackgroundInfluentialBorah, P., & Xiao, X. (2018) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2018.1455770 · Cited by 227
Effect of Source Attribution on Perception of Online News Stories
Sundar, S. S. (1998) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/107769909807500108 · Cited by 213
Fueling the Fire: Violent Metaphors, Trait Aggression, and Support for Political Violence
Kalmoe, N. P. (2014) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2013.852642 · Cited by 234
Changing Attitudes toward Handicapped Persons: A Review and Analysis of Research
Donaldson, J. (1980) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440298004600702 · Cited by 216
Luo, C., Luo, X. R., Schatzberg, L., & Sia, C. L. (2013) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2013.05.005 · Cited by 231
Petkova, A. P., Rindova, V., & Gupta, A. K. (2012) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0759 · Cited by 219
E-WOM from e-commerce websites and social media: Which will consumers adopt?
Yan, Q., Wu, S. F., Wang, L., Wu, P., Chen, H., & Wei, G. (2016) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2016.03.004 · Cited by 248
“Messages from sources with high credibility have greater influence on recipients (Hovland and Weiss, 1951).”
BackgroundThe Determinants of Email Receivers’ Disseminating Behaviors on the Internet
Chiu, H.-C., Hsieh, Y.-C., Kao, Y.-H., & Lee, M. (2007) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/s0021849907070547 · Cited by 210
Does source matter? Examining source effects in online product reviews
Dou, X., Walden, J. A., Lee, S. Y., & Lee, J. Y. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.03.015 · Cited by 227
Sakib, M. N., Zolfagharian, M., & Yazdanparast, A. (2019) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.002 · Cited by 225
An experimental comparison of conclusion-drawing by the communicator and by the audience.
Hovland, C. I., & Mandell, W. (1952) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0059833 · Cited by 211
Self-citationInformation utility and the multiple source effect
Harkins, S. G., & Petty, R. E. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.2.260 · Cited by 210
Published word of mouth: Referable, consumer-generated information on the internet
Schindler, R. M., & Bickart, B. A. (2005) · Cited by 207
Dissent as Driving Cognition, Attitudes, and Judgments
Nemeth, C. J. (1995) · Social Cognition · doi:10.1521/soco.1995.13.3.273 · Cited by 206
Homer, P. M., & Kahle, L. R. (1990) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1990.10673178 · Cited by 202
Ethnic Identification on Adolescents’ Evaluations of Advertisements
Appiah, O. (2001) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/jar-41-5-7-22 · Cited by 203
Making the Truth Stick & the Myths Fade: Lessons from Cognitive Psychology
Schwarz, N., Newman, E., & Leach, W. (2016) · Behavioral Science & Policy · doi:10.1353/bsp.2016.0009 · Cited by 203
“This retrospective attribution of a myth to a more credible source goes beyond the more common observation that messages initially seen as unconvincing because they come from an untrustworthy source can exert an influence later on, once their source is forgotten (a phenomenon known as the sleeper effect).(44,45) Myth-…”
BackgroundDeterminants of E-WOM Influence: The Role of Consumers' Internet Experience
López, M., & Piñero, M. S. (2013) · Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research · doi:10.4067/s0718-18762014000100004 · Cited by 251
Social influence in social advertising: evidence from field experiments
Bakshy, E., Eckles, D., Yan, R., & Rosenn, I. (2012) · ACM Conference on Economics and Computation · doi:10.1145/2229012.2229027 · Cited by 295
Ego-involvement, discrepancy, source credibility, and attitude change.
Rhine, R. J., & Severance, L. J. (1970) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0029832 · Cited by 201
Climate change: Why the conspiracy theories are dangerous
Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2015) · Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists · doi:10.1177/0096340215571908 · Cited by 211
The effects of visual information in eWOM communication
Lin, T. M. Y., Lu, K., & Wu, J. (2012) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/17505931211241341 · Cited by 202
Credibility in Context: How Uncivil Online Commentary Affects News Credibility
Thorson, K., Vraga, E. K., & Ekdale, B. (2010) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/15205430903225571 · Cited by 200
Australasian Marketing Journal
Alpert, F. H., & Johnson, L. W. (1998) · Cited by 200
Determinants of information retweeting in microblogging
Liu, Z., Liu, L., & Li, H. (2012) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/10662241211250980 · Cited by 207
The Effects of Expertise and Physical Attractiveness Upon Opinion Agreement and Liking
Horai, J., Naccari, N., & Fatoullah, E. (1974) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/2786431 · Cited by 198
The Relative Effectiveness of External, Peer, and Self‐Coaches
Sue‐Chan, C., & Latham, G. P. (2004) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00171.x · Cited by 200
“The higher the perceived source credibility, the higher the likelihood that behavior will change as a result of it (Hovland & Weiss, 1951).”
BackgroundThe impact of source credible online reviews on purchase intention
Chakraborty, U. (2019) · Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1108/jrim-06-2018-0080 · Cited by 281
Risk communication: Towards a rational discourse with the public
Renn, O. (1992) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/0304-3894(92)85047-5 · Cited by 199
Liu, M. T., Huang, Y., & Minghua, J. (2007) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363760710822945 · Cited by 195
“The source credibility model, based on the social psychology literature (Hovland and Weiss, 1952; Hovland et al., 1953), asserts that endorsers exhibiting expertise and reliability are credible and, to that extent, persuasive (McCracken, 1989).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Public Opinion Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1951
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 635
- ISSN
- 0033-362X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120061261
- Cited by
- 3,543
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 302 · 2025: 216 · 2024: 217 · 2023: 209 · 2022: 201 · 2021: 181 · 2020: 203 · 2019: 145 · 2018: 129 · 2017: 137 · 2016: 115 · 2015: 128 · 2014: 128 · 2013: 115 · 2012: 110
- FWCI
- 25.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Public Opinion Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Keywords
- source credibility, communication effectiveness, forgetting, memory retention, trustworthiness, skepticism, persuasion, misinformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review