The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness
Abstract
In a new test of the process of forgetting, the authors found that subjects, at the time of exposure, discounted material from “untrustworthy” sources. In time, however, the subjects tended to disassociate the content and the source with the result that the original scepticism faded and the “untrustworthy” material was accepted. Lies, in fact, seemed to be remembered better than truths.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Source expertise affects attitude change (Hovland and Weiss 1951; McCracken 1989; Ohanian 1991), level of confidence and positivity (Tormala, Briñol, and Petty 2007), and behavioral changes (Crisci and Kassinove 1973) and leads to higher levels of persuasion (Petty and Wegener 1998).”
From Driving Brand Engagement Through Online Social Influencers: An Empirical Investigation of Sponsored Blogging Campaigns (2019) · cites this paper as Hovland and Weiss 1951
In the citing paper
“Source credibility theory posits that the effectiveness of a persuasive message depends on the perceived credibility of its source (Hovland and Weiss, 1951).”
From Understanding consumer purchase intention in social media influencer marketing: the mediating role of parasocial relationship and trust in the Moroccan context (2026) · cites this paper as Hovland and Weiss, 1951
In the citing paper
“This finding is consistent with source credibility theory (Hovland and Weiss, 1951), which posits that the persuasive power of a source depends not only on its perceived attributes but also on the relational context in which communication occurs.”
From Understanding consumer purchase intention in social media influencer marketing: the mediating role of parasocial relationship and trust in the Moroccan context (2026) · cites this paper as Hovland and Weiss, 1951
In the citing paper
“Our findings show that trust in government is strongly associated with vaccine acceptance and can contribute to public compliance with recommended actions15.”
From A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine (2021) · cites this paper as [15]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · Cited by 9,953
“FRAMING AND SOCIAL MOVEMENTS 621 more credible are generally more persuasive (Hovland & Weiss 1951, Aronson & Golden 1962).”
BackgroundThe Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60214-2 · Cited by 8,822
French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. H. (1986) · University of Pittsburgh Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/jj.12381759.38 · Cited by 4,544
Ohanian, R. (1990) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1990.10673191 · Cited by 4,043
Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249 · Cited by 3,732
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) · Communication and Persuasion · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4964-1_1 · Cited by 3,202
Who is the Celebrity Endorser? Cultural Foundations of the Endorsement Process
McCracken, G. (1989) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209217 · Cited by 3,196
A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine
Lazarus, J. V., Ratzan, S. C., Palayew, A., Gostin, L. O., Larson, H. J., Rabin, K., Kimball, S., & El-Mohandes, A. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-1124-9 · Cited by 2,904
Lou, C., & Yuan, S. (2019) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501 · Cited by 2,795
“Earlier researchers used source credibility to gauge a source’s influence on the effectiveness of persuasive messages (e.g., Giffin 1967; Hovland and Weiss 1951; McGuire 1985).”
BackgroundThe Persuasiveness of Source Credibility: A Critical Review of Five Decades' Evidence
Pornpitakpan, C. (2004) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x · Cited by 2,205
Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information
Bickart, B. A., & Schindler, R. M. (2001) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1002/dir.1014 · Cited by 1,836
The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model
Cheung, C. M. K., & Thadani, D. R. (2012) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.008 · Cited by 2,005
Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011 · Cited by 1,650
On the Limits of Framing Effects: Who Can Frame?
Druckman, J. N. (2001) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00100 · Cited by 1,311
“, Hovland and Weiss 1951-52; Petty and Wegener 1998, 344-45). More recently, Miller and Krosnick (2000) show that source trustworthiness moderates media priming.”
BackgroundCheung, M. Y., Luo, C., Sia, C. L., & Chen, H. (2009) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415130402 · Cited by 1,286
Valente, T. W. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1217330 · Cited by 1,271
A formal theory of social power.
French, J. (1956) · Psychology Review · doi:10.1037/h0046123 · Cited by 1,248
How Entrepreneurs Use Symbolic Management to Acquire Resources
Zott, C., & Huy, Q. N. (2007) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.52.1.70 · Cited by 1,111
“, entrepreneur) affects the credibility of the message (Hovland and Weiss, 1951; Petty and Cacioppo, 1986).”
BackgroundAntecedents and consequences of trust and satisfaction in buyer‐seller relationships
Selnes, F. (1998) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090569810204580 · Cited by 1,105
Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
Greenwald, A. G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076157 · Cited by 1,022
Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables.
Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1998) · Cited by 993
SELLING ISSUES TO TOP MANAGEMENT
Dutton, J. E., & Ashford, S. J. (1993) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1993.9309035145 · Cited by 970
From private attitude to public opinion: A dynamic theory of social impact.
Nowak, A. K., Szamrej, J., & Latané, B. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.3.362 · Cited by 975
“On the other hand, when personal involvement is low, people do not pay full attention to messages, and persuasion is determined by such peripheral cues as the source's expertise (Hass, 198 l, Hovland & Weiss, 1952 ), trustworthiness (Eagly, Wood, & Chaiken, 1978; Walster & Festinger, 1962), attractiveness (Chaiken, 19…”
BackgroundA Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong?
Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2010) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00364.x · Cited by 1,050
Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., Klein, T. R., & Highberger, L. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.105 · Cited by 1,463
Negative affect and social judgment: The differential impact of anger and sadness
Bodenhausen, G. V., Sheppard, L. A., & Kramer, G. P. (1994) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420240104 · Cited by 909
Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens' Conversations Limit Elite Influence
Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, K. R. (2003) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/1540-5907.00051 · Cited by 841
Chung, S., & Cho, H. (2017) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.21001 · Cited by 809
Hughes, C., Swaminathan, V., & Brooks, G. (2019) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/0022242919854374 · Cited by 789
“Source expertise affects attitude change (Hovland and Weiss 1951; McCracken 1989; Ohanian 1991), level of confidence and positivity (Tormala, Briñol, and Petty 2007), and behavioral changes (Crisci and Kassinove 1973) and leads to higher levels of persuasion (Petty and Wegener 1998).”
BackgroundWhen Do Interlocks Matter?: Alternate Sources of Information and Interlock Influence
Haunschild, P. R., & Beckman, C. M. (1998) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393617 · Cited by 751
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Eyal, K., Lemus, D. R., & McCann, R. M. (2003) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2003.11679029 · Cited by 780
“Evaluations of credibility are higher when message discrepancy is low (Hovland & Weiss, 1951).”
BackgroundWells, Valacich, J. S., & Hess (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23044048 · Cited by 900
Students and Housewives: Differences in Susceptibility to Reference Group Influence
Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1977) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208685 · Cited by 746
(2002) · Cited by 770
Credibility and trust in risk communication
Renn, O., & Levine, D. (1991) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1952-5_10 · Cited by 731
Public Trust or Mistrust? Perceptions of Media Credibility in the Information Age
Kiousis, S. K. (2001) · Mass Communication & Society · doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0404_4 · Cited by 704
Fact-checking: a meta-analysis of what works and for whom
Walter, N., Cohen, J., Holbert, R. L., & Morag, Y. (2020) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1668894 · Cited by 690
“Though traditional theories in education and persuasion identified source characteristics such as credibility (Hovland & Weiss, 1951), expertise (Holvand, Janis, & Kelley, 1953), competence and objectivity (Whitehead, 1968) as prime determinants of message effectiveness, more recent findings have…”
BackgroundTrust me, trust me not: A nuanced view of influencer marketing on social media
Kim, D. Y., & Kim, H.-Y. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.024 · Cited by 804
Page, B. I., Shapiro, R. Y., & Dempsey, G. R. (1987) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1960777 · Cited by 686
Choi, S. M., & Rifon, N. J. (2012) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.20550 · Cited by 691
Faculty of Economics and Management, U. P. M. K. L., Lim, X. J., Mohd Radzol, A. R. B., Faculty of Economics and Management, U. P. M. K. L., Cheah, J.-H. (., Azman Hashim International Business School, U. T. M. K. L., Wong, M. W., & Faculty of Health, A. A. D. (2017) · Asian Journal of Business Research · doi:10.14707/ajbr.170035 · Cited by 679
Effectiveness of Celebrity Endorsers
Atkin, C. K., & Block, M. P. (1983) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.1080/00218499.1983.12468060 · Cited by 685
Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams
Cronin, M. A., & Weingart, L. R. (2007) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2007.25275511 · Cited by 678
Diviani, N., van den Putte, B., Giani, S., & van Weert, J. C. (2015) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4018 · Cited by 638
Out on a Limb: The Role of Context and Impression Management in Selling Gender-Equity Issues
Ashford, S. J., Rothbard, N. P., Piderit, S. K., & Dutton, J. E. (1998) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393590 · Cited by 632
How Online Product Reviews Affect Retail Sales: A Meta-analysis
Floyd, K., Freling, R. E., Alhoqail, S. A., Cho, H. Y., & Freling, T. H. (2014) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2014.04.004 · Cited by 671
An experimental analysis of self-persuasion
Bem, D. J. (1965) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(65)90026-0 · Cited by 632
Appelman, A., & Sundar, S. S. (2015) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/1077699015606057 · Cited by 667
The trouble with radicalization
Neumann, P. R. (2013) · International Affairs · doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12049 · Cited by 626
Robinson, M. J. (1976) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1959647 · Cited by 592
Bal, P. M., & Veltkamp, M. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0055341 · Cited by 588
Social media marketing: Comparative effect of advertisement sources
Shareef, M. A., Mukerji, B., Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., & Islam, R. (2017) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.001 · Cited by 708
Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past.
Jacoby, L. L., Kelley, C., Brown, J. E., & Jasechko, J. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.326 · Cited by 623
Boerman, S. C., Willemsen, L. M., & Van Der Aa, E. P. (2017) · Journal of Interactive Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2016.12.002 · Cited by 581
The External Validity of Experiments
Bracht, G. H., & Glass, G. V. (1968) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312005004437 · Cited by 626
Masuda, H., Han, S. H., & Lee, J. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121246 · Cited by 576
Selecting Celebrity Endorsers: The Practitioner’s Perspective
Erdogan, B. Z., Baker, M. J., & Tagg, S. K. (2001) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/jar-41-3-39-48 · Cited by 564
Using Expert Sources to Correct Health Misinformation in Social Media
Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2017) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547017731776 · Cited by 627
Counseling: An interpersonal influence process.
Strong, S. R. (1968) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0020229 · Cited by 614
The Logic of the Survey Experiment Reexamined
Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., & Quirk, P. J. (2007) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpl008 · Cited by 553
Can 40 Seconds of Compassion Reduce Patient Anxiety?
Fogarty, L., Curbow, B. A., Wingard, J. R., McDonnell, K. A., & Somerfield, M. R. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1999.17.1.371 · Cited by 545
Implications of Commodity Theory for Value Change
Brock, T. C. (1968) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3071-9.50016-7 · Cited by 548
Yuan, S., & Lou, C. (2020) · Journal of Interactive Advertising · doi:10.1080/15252019.2020.1769514 · Cited by 543
Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress?
Greenwald, A. G., Pratkanis, A. R., Leippe, M. R., & Baumgardner, M. H. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.93.2.216 · Cited by 574
Rumor psychology: Social and organizational approaches.
DiFonzo, N., & Bordia, P. (2007) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/11503-000 · Cited by 535
Conceptualizing sources in online news
Sundar, S. S., & Nass, C. (2001) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02872.x · Cited by 533
Celebrity endorsements: a literature review and research agenda
Bergkvist, L., & Zhou, K. Q. (2016) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2015.1137537 · Cited by 595
“There is a fair amount of research on celebrity source effects drawing on the work of Hovland and associates (e.g., Hovland and Weiss 1951 52; Hovland, Janis, and Kelley 1953) and McGuire (1985).”
BackgroundMethodThe effect of characteristics of source credibility on consumer behaviour: A meta-analysis
Ismagilova, E., Slade, E., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.005 · Cited by 504
Factors influencing word of mouth effectiveness: receiver perspectives
Sweeney, J., Soutar, G. N., & Mazzarol, T. W. (2008) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560810852977 · Cited by 496
“noted that the receiver and their responses were the most difficult to study, while Hovland and Weiss (1951)”
BackgroundSparks, B., So, K. K. F., & Bradley, G. L. (2015) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2015.09.011 · Cited by 541
Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984) · ACR North American Advances · Cited by 478
McGuire, W. J., & Papageorgis, D. (1961) · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0042026 · Cited by 476
The effects of information and company reputation on intentions to buy a business service
Yoon, E., Guffey, H. J., & Kijewski, V. (1993) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/0148-2963(93)90027-m · Cited by 472
Policy Narratives and Policy Processes
Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2011) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00420.x · Cited by 472
Reconciling conflicting results derived from experimental and survey studies of attitude change.
Hovland, C. I. (1959) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0042210 · Cited by 462
Self-citationWu, P. C. S., & Wang, Y. (2011) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/13555851111165020 · Cited by 520
Aronson, E. (1999) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0088188 · Cited by 458
Schema Theory: An Information Processing Model of Perception and Cognition
Axelrod, R. (1973) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1956546 · Cited by 456
Schwarz, N., Sanna, L. J., Skurnik, I., & Yoon, C. (2007) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)39003-x · Cited by 441
“Because messages from high credibility sources are more influential, as known since Hovland and Weiss (1951), this will further enhance the acceptance of the false claim—including its acceptance by others, who are told that one learned it from a credible source.”
BackgroundThe Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth Communications on Intention to Buy: A Meta-Analysis
Ismagilova, E., Slade, E. L., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2019) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-019-09924-y · Cited by 707
"Reinstatement" of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change.
Kelman, H. C., & Hovland, C. I. (1953) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0061861 · Cited by 444
Self-citationBraman, D., Kahan, D. M., Cohen, G. L., Slovic, P., & Gastil, J. (2008) · Scholarly Commons - George Washington University Law School (George Washington University) · Cited by 431
Similarity, credibility, and attitude change: A review and a theory.
Simons, H. W., Berkowitz, N. N., & Moyer, R. J. (1970) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0028429 · Cited by 426
Lowry, P. B., Cao, J., & Everard, A. (2011) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222270406 · Cited by 422
Effects of Online Health Sources on Credibility and Behavioral Intentions
Hu, Y., & Sundar, S. S. (2009) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650209351512 · Cited by 414
Wells, J. D., Valacich, J. S., & Hess, T. J. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.5555/2017507.2017513 · Cited by 407
The Impact of Trust in the News Media on Online News Consumption and Participation
Fletcher, R., & Park, S. (2017) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1279979 · Cited by 390
Biased Press or Biased Public? Attitudes Toward Media Coverage of Social Groups
Gunther, A. C. (1992) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/269308 · Cited by 401
The Persuasive Effect of Source Credibility: A Situational Analysis
Sternthal, B., Phillips, L. W., & Dholakia, R. R. (1978) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/268454 · Cited by 395
Rojo, L. M., & van Dijk, T. A. (1997) · Discourse & Society · doi:10.1177/0957926597008004005 · Cited by 414
Lou, C., & Kim, H. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02567 · Cited by 369
Frewer, L. J., Scholderer, J., & Bredahl, L. (2003) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/j.0272-4332.2003.00385.x · Cited by 391
Highly Credible Sources: Persuasive Facilitators or Persuasive Liabilities?
Dholakia, R. R., & Sternthal, B. (1977) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208671 · Cited by 378
Veirman, M. D., & Hudders, L. (2019) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2019.1575108 · Cited by 473
“Consumers tend to believe that influencers are trustworthy sources who express their genuine liking for a brand, which makes them more likely to be persuaded, according to source credibility theory (Erdogan 1999; Hovland and Weiss 1951; Ohanian 1991).”
BackgroundEnter the Robot Journalist: Users' perceptions of automated content
Clerwall, C. (2014) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2014.883116 · Cited by 377
“Since the first (as acknowledged by e.g. Chung, Kim, and Kim 2010; Sundar and Nass 2001) study on credibility, by Hovland and Weiss (1951), a plethora of studies have been undertaken on the matter.”
BackgroundResultPerceived helpfulness of online consumer reviews: The role of message content and style
Schindler, R. M., & Bickart, B. A. (2012) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.1372 · Cited by 382
Persuasive effects of fictional narratives increase over time
Appel, M., & Richter, T. (2007) · Media Psychology · doi:10.1080/15213260701301194 · Cited by 376
“…increases over time when the discounting cue is forgotten or its memory representation is dissociated from the representation of the message content (Hovland & Weiss, 1951), or when the memory trace of the discounting cue decays faster than that of the message content (Pratkanis et al., 1988).”
InfluentialCommunicator credibility and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion change.
Aronson, E., Turner, J. A., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1963) · Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0045513 · Cited by 371
Eastin, M. S. (2001) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00126.x · Cited by 364
Xie, H. “., Miao, L., Kuo, P., & Lee, B.-Y. (2010) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2010.04.008 · Cited by 392
Metadata
- Authors
- Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Venue
- Public Opinion Quarterly
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1951
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 635
- ISSN
- 0033-362X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120061261
- Cited by
- 3,543
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 302 · 2025: 216 · 2024: 217 · 2023: 209 · 2022: 201 · 2021: 181 · 2020: 203 · 2019: 145 · 2018: 129 · 2017: 137 · 2016: 115 · 2015: 128 · 2014: 128 · 2013: 115 · 2012: 110
- FWCI
- 25.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Public Opinion Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Keywords
- source credibility, communication effectiveness, forgetting, memory retention, trustworthiness, skepticism, persuasion, misinformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review