The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
NUCLEOSYNTHESIS IN HELIUM-ENRICHED ASYMPTOTIC GIANT BRANCH MODELS: IMPLICATIONS FOR HEAVY ELEMENT ENRICHMENT IN ω CENTAURI
Open accessAbstract
We investigate the effect of helium enrichment on the evolution and nucleosynthesis of low-mass asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars of 1.7 M ☉ and 2.36 M ☉ with a metallicity of Z = 0.0006 ([Fe/H] ≈−1.4). We calculate evolutionary sequences with the primordial helium abundance ( Y = 0.24) and with helium-enriched compositions ( Y = 0.30, 0.35, 0.40). For comparison, we calculate models of the same mass but at a lower metallicity Z = 0.0003 ([Fe/H] ≈−1.8) with Y = 0.24. Post-processing nucleosynthesis calculations are performed on each of the evolutionary sequences to determine the production of elements from hydrogen to bismuth. Elemental surface abundance predictions and stellar yields are presented for each model. The models with enriched helium have shorter main sequence and AGB lifetimes, and they enter the AGB with a more massive hydrogen-exhausted core than the primordial helium model. The main consequences are as follows: (1) low-mass AGB models with enhanced helium will evolve more than twice as fast, giving them the chance to contribute sooner to the chemical evolution of the forming globular clusters, and (2) the stellar yields will be strongly reduced relative to their primordial helium counterparts. An increase of Δ Y = 0.10 at a given mass decreases the yields of carbon by up to ≈60% and of fluorine by up to 80%; it also decreases the yields of the s -process elements barium and lanthanum by ≈45%. While the yields of first s -process peak elements strontium, yttrium, and zirconium decrease by up to 50%, the yields of rubidium either do not change or increase.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The lifetimes of He-enriched models are significantly shorter than their counterparts with primordial He content”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Karakas et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“The main reason is that an increase of Delta1 Y = 0 . 10 leads to roughly a factor of 3 decrease in the amount of dredged up material during the AGB.”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Karakas et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“An increase of Delta1 Y = 0 . 10 at a given mass decreases the yields of C by up to ≈ 60%, of F by up to 80%, and the yields of the s -process elements Ba and La by ≈ 45%.”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Karakas et al. (2014)
In the citing paper
“Karakas et al. (2014) study the effect of helium enrichment on AGB evolution and nucleosynthesis for two masses ( M = 1 . 7 , 2 . 36 M ⊙ ) at two metallicities appropriate for the GC ω Centauri ( Z = 0 . 0003 , 0 . 0006, which is roughly [ Fe/H ] ≈ -1 . 8 and -1 . 4, respectively).”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Karakas et al. (2014)
Citations
Cites
Stellar Models and Yields of Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars
Karakas, A., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2007) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1071/as07021 · Cited by 312
Self-citationSodium content as a predictor of the advanced evolution of globular cluster stars
Campbell, S. W., D’Orazi, V., Yong, D., Constantino, T. N., Lattanzio, J. C., Stancliffe, R. J., Angelou, G. C., Wylie-de Boer, E. C., & Grundahl, F. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12191 · Cited by 81
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 118
- Abia, 2001, ApJ, 559, 1117, 10.1086/322383 · DOI
- Abia, 2002, ApJ, 579, 817, 10.1086/342924 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 · DOI · Paper page
- Atlee, 2009, ApJ, 694, 1539, 10.1088/0004-637X/694/2/1539 · DOI
- Bedin, 2004, ApJL, 605, L125, 10.1086/420847 · DOI
- Bekki, 2012, ApJ, 747, 78, 10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/78 · DOI
- Bellini, 2013, ApJL, 769, L32, 10.1088/2041-8205/769/2/L32 · DOI
- Bellini, 2010, AJ, 140, 631, 10.1088/0004-6256/140/2/631 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16369.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19484.x · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20066861 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20078055 · DOI
- 10.1023/B:ASTR.0000044324.60467.d2 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20077806 · DOI
- Busso, 2001, ApJ, 557, 802, 10.1086/322258 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1146/annurev.astro.37.1.239 · DOI
- Calamida, 2009, ApJ, 706, 1277, 10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/1277 · DOI
- Calamida, 2008, ApJL, 673, L29, 10.1086/527436 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20066074 · DOI
- 10.1086/145970 · DOI
- 10.1086/108085 · DOI
- Cannon, 1993, MNRAS, 263, 817, 10.1093/mnras/263.4.817 · DOI
- Cassisi, 2008, ApJL, 672, L115, 10.1086/527035 · DOI
- Chung, 2011, ApJL, 740, L45, 10.1088/2041-8205/740/2/L45 · DOI
- 10.1086/156825 · DOI
- 10.1086/183265 · DOI
- Cristallo, 2011, ApJS, 197, 17, 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/17 · DOI · Paper page
- Cristallo, 2009, ApJ, 696, 797, 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/797 · DOI · Paper page
- Cunha, 2002, AJ, 124, 379, 10.1086/340967 · DOI
- Cyburt, 2010, ApJS, 189, 240, 10.1088/0067-0049/189/1/240 · DOI
- Da Costa, 2009, ApJ, 705, 1481, 10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/1481 · DOI
- 10.1071/AS10027 · DOI
- Da Costa, 2013, ApJ, 769, 8, 10.1088/0004-637X/769/1/8 · DOI · Paper page
- D'Antona, 2005, ApJ, 631, 868, 10.1086/431968 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20021220 · DOI
- D'Antona, 2011, ApJ, 736, 5, 10.1088/0004-637X/736/1/5 · DOI
- D'Antona, 2010, ApJL, 715, L63, 10.1088/2041-8205/715/2/L63 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20078425 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/200911822 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/200913205 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16996.x · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201219150 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18642.x · DOI
- 10.1093/mnras/stt728 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201117630 · DOI
- Dupree, 2013, ApJL, 773, L28, 10.1088/2041-8205/773/2/L28 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08108.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201117794 · DOI
- Frost, 1996, ApJ, 473, 383, 10.1086/178152 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150608 · DOI
- Gallino, 1998, ApJ, 497, 388, 10.1086/305437 · DOI
- Goriely, 2000, A&A, 362, 599
- 10.1146/annurev.astro.43.072103.150600 · DOI
- Herwig, 2003, ApJ, 593, 1056, 10.1086/376726 · DOI · Paper page
- Herwig, 2012, ApJ, 757, 132, 10.1088/0004-637X/757/2/132 · DOI
- Johnson, 2010, ApJ, 722, 1373, 10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1373 · DOI
- Johnson, 2009, ApJ, 698, 2048, 10.1088/0004-637X/698/2/2048 · DOI
- Johnson, 2008, ApJ, 681, 1505, 10.1086/588634 · DOI
- Joo, 2013, ApJ, 762, 36, 10.1088/0004-637X/762/1/36 · DOI
- Kamath, 2012, ApJ, 746, 20, 10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/20 · DOI · Paper page
- Karakas, 2010, ApJ, 713, 374, 10.1088/0004-637X/713/1/374 · DOI
- Karakas, 2006, ApJ, 652, 1240, 10.1086/508504 · DOI
- Karakas, 2012, ApJ, 751, 8, 10.1088/0004-637X/751/1/8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1071/AS02013 · DOI · Paper page
- Karakas, 2007, ApJL, 656, L73, 10.1086/512676 · DOI
- Karakas, 2009, ApJ, 690, 1130, 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1130 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20054462 · DOI
- King, 2012, AJ, 144, 5, 10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/5 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201220694 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201118763 · DOI
- 10.1086/164810 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.05.088 · DOI
- Lee, 2005, ApJL, 621, L57, 10.1086/428944 · DOI
- Lugaro, 2012, ApJ, 747, 2, 10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12386.x · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/200912598 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/200911827 · DOI
- Marino, 2011, ApJ, 731, 64, 10.1088/0004-637X/731/1/64 · DOI
- Marino, 2012, ApJ, 746, 14, 10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/14 · DOI
- 10.1093/mnras/stt1993 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201118381 · DOI
- McWilliam, 2013, ApJ, 778, 149, 10.1088/0004-637X/778/2/149 · DOI
- Milone, 2008, ApJ, 673, 241, 10.1086/524188 · DOI
- Nataf, 2012, ApJL, 751, L39, 10.1088/2041-8205/751/2/L39 · DOI
- Nataf, 2011, ApJ, 730, 118, 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/118 · DOI
- Norris, 2004, ApJL, 612, L25, 10.1086/423986 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/175909 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201117378 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201016024 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201116592 · DOI
- Piersanti, 2013, ApJ, 774, 98, 10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/98 · DOI · Paper page
- Pignatari, 2010, ApJ, 710, 1557, 10.1088/0004-637X/710/2/1557 · DOI
- Piotto, 2005, ApJ, 621, 777, 10.1086/427796 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1051/0004-6361:20077205 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13892.x · DOI
- Roederer, 2011, ApJ, 742, 37, 10.1088/0004-637X/742/1/37 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2007.00320.x · DOI
- 10.1093/mnras/stt386 · DOI
- 10.1093/mnras/stt857 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22012.x · DOI
- Smith, 2000, AJ, 119, 1239, 10.1086/301276 · DOI
- Sollima, 2005, ApJ, 634, 332, 10.1086/496945 · DOI
- Stanford, 2010, ApJ, 714, 1001, 10.1088/0004-637X/714/2/1001 · DOI
- Stanford, 2006, ApJ, 647, 1075, 10.1086/505571 · DOI
- Stanford, 2007, ApJ, 667, 911, 10.1086/520794 · DOI
- Sterling, 2008, ApJS, 174, 158, 10.1086/520845 · DOI
- Straniero, 1997, ApJ, 478, 332, 10.1086/303794 · DOI
- 10.1086/191219 · DOI
- 10.1086/155523 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201116955 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201219510 · DOI
- 10.1051/0004-6361/201117896 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/133451 · DOI
- 10.1086/173033 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1051/0004-6361/200811139 · DOI
- Villanova, 2007, ApJ, 663, 296, 10.1086/517905 · DOI
- Yong, 2009, ApJL, 695, L62, 10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/L62 · DOI
- Yoon, 2008, ApJ, 677, 1080, 10.1086/533510 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars
Karakas, A. I., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2014) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2014.21 · Cited by 735
“Karakas et al. (2014) study the effect of helium enrichment on AGB evolution and nucleosynthesis for two masses (M = 1.7, 2.36M⊙) at two metallicities appropriate for the GC ω Centauri (Z = 0.0003, 0.0006, which is roughly [Fe/H] ≈ −1.8 and −1.4, respectively).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Karakas, A. I., Marino, A. F., & Nataf, D. M.
- Affiliations
- Australian National University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Karakas, Amanda I.
- ORCID
- Nataf, David M.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2014-02-28
- Volume
- 784
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2167300298
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Nuclear physics research studies
- Keywords
- helium enrichment, asymptotic giant branch stars, stellar nucleosynthesis, stellar yields, Omega Centauri, globular clusters, s-process elements, stellar evolution, chemical evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review